DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

What Is the Ideal Entry Point for Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy?

  • Lee, Jong Un (Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ki Jeoung (Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ki Hong (Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Man Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Young Hwan (Department of Radiology, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.02.27
  • Accepted : 2020.04.14
  • Published : 2020.09.01

Abstract

Objective : The method of approach during transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) has been the subject of repeated study. However, the ideal entry point during TELD has not been studied in detail. Therefore, this study investigated the ideal entry point for avoiding complications using computed tomography (CT) scans obtained from patients in the prone position. Methods : Using CT scans obtained from patients in the prone position, we checked for retroperitoneal or visceral violations and measured the angles of approach with five conventional approach lines drawn on axial CT scans at each disc space level (L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5). We also determined the ideal entry point distance and approach angles for avoiding retroperitoneal or visceral violations. Correlation analysis was performed to identify the patient characteristics related to the ideal entry point properties. Results : We found that the far lateral approach at the L2-3 level resulted in high rates of visceral violation. However, rates of visceral violation at the L3-4 and L4-5 levels were remarkably low or absent. The ideal angles of approach decreased moving caudally along the spine, and the ideal entry point distances increased moving caudally along the spine. Weight, body mass index (BMI), and the depth of the posterior vertebral line from the skin were positively associated with the distance of the ideal entry point from the midline. Conclusion : We reviewed the risk of the extreme lateral approach by analyzing rates of retroperitoneal and visceral violations during well-known methods of approach. We suggested an ideal entry point at each level of the lumbar spine and found a positive correlation between the distance of the entry point to the midline and patient characteristics such as BMI, weight, and the depth of the posterior vertebral line from the skin.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn Y : Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices 9 : 361-366, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.12.23
  2. Ahn Y, Kim JU, Lee BH, Lee SH, Park JD, Hong DH, et al. : Postoperative retroperitoneal hematoma following transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 10 : 595-602, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08227
  3. Hurday Y, Xu B, Guo L, Cao Y, Wan Y, Jiang H, et al. : Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD). Eur Spine J 26 : 635-645, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4454-z
  4. Kambin P, Casey K, O'Brien E, Zhou L : Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis. J Neurosurg 84 : 462-467, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0462
  5. Kambin P, Gellman H : Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 174 : 127-132, 1983
  6. Kamson S, Trescot AM, Sampson PD, Zhang Y : Full-endoscopic assisted lumbar decompressive surgery performed in an outpatient, ambulatory facility: report of 5 years of complications and risk factors. Pain Physician 20 : E221-E231, 2017
  7. Kim HS, Adsul N, Kapoor A, Choi SH, Kim JH, Kim KJ, et al. : A mobile outside-in technique of transforaminal lumbar endoscopy for lumbar disc herniations. J Vis Ex (138) : 57999, 2018
  8. Kim M, Kim HS, Oh SW, Adsul NM, Singh R, Kashlan ON, et al. : Evolution of spinal endoscopic surgery. Neurospine 16 : 6-14, 2019 https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836322.161
  9. Kim M, Lee S, Kim HS, Park S, Shim SY, Lim DJ : A comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018 : 9073460, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9073460
  10. Lee DH, Kim NH, Park JB, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Kim YT, et al. : CT scan assessment of the pathway of the true lateral approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: is it possible? J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 1395-1399, 2011
  11. Li X, Han Y, Di Z, Cui J, Pan J, Yang M, et al. : Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Neurosci 33 : 19-27, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.043
  12. Matsumoto M, Hasegawa T, Ito M, Aizawa T, Konno S, Yamagata M, et al. : Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 15 : 92-96, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1428-6
  13. Mayer HM, Brock M : Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 78 : 216-225, 1993 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216
  14. Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping A : Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 31 : 86-92, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061
  15. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G : An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the fullendoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 2570-2578, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000186327.21435.cc
  16. Schubert M, Hoogland T : Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17 : 641-661, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-005-1156-9
  17. Stucker R : The Transforaminal Endoscopic Approach in Mayer HM (ed) : Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Surgical Manual. Berlin : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, pp201-205
  18. Yeung AT : The evolution and advancement of endoscopic foraminal surgery: one surgeon's experience incorporating adjunctive techologies. SAS J 1 : 108-117, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1935-9810(07)70055-5
  19. Yeung AT, Tsou PM : Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 722-731, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009
  20. Yeung AT, Yeung CA : Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am 38 : 363-372; abstract vi, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2007.04.005

Cited by

  1. An alternative approach for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection—Far lateral approach vol.21, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13060