DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization and Pretreatment for Hot Water Extraction of Korean Deer (Cervus canadensis Erxleben) Velvet Antlers

  • Jang, Dong Wook (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ameer, Kashif (Department of Food Science and Technology and BK 21 Plus Program, Graduate School of Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Jun-Hyun (Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Park, Mi-Kyung (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.04.06
  • Accepted : 2020.05.03
  • Published : 2020.08.28

Abstract

Velvet antler (VA) is a historically traditional medicinal supplement and is well known in Asian countries for its pharmaceutical and health benefits. The objectives for this study were to optimize the hot water extraction (HWE) of VA for the Korean VA industry, and to determine the most effective pretreatment method among microwave (MW), ultrasonication (US), and enzymatic (EZ) techniques. Using response surface methodology, optimum extraction temperatures and times were determined by central composite design configuration based on extraction yield and sialic acid content. Various quality parameters of VA extract including yield, soluble solid, protein, and sialic acid contents were also compared with the conjunction of HWE and pretreatment. The yield and sialic acid content of VA extract were determined to be 40% and 0.73 mg/g, respectively, under an optimum temperature of 100℃ at 24 h of extraction time. The yields from VA extracts pretreated with MW, US, and EZ were 17.42%, 19.73%, and 29.15%, respectively. Among the tested commercial enzymes, pepsin was the most effective proteolytic enzyme and led to the highest yield (47.65%), soluble solids (4.03 °brix), protein (1.12 mg/ml), and sialic acid (3.04 mg/ml) contents from VA extract.

Keywords

References

  1. Ameer K, Shahbaz HM, Kwon JH. 2017. Green extraction methods for polyphenols from plant matrices and their byproducts: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F. 16: 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12253
  2. Earnest CP, Quindry J, Panton L, Broeder C. 2015. Effect of deer antler velvet on aerobic, anaerobic and strength performance. Cent. Eur. J. Sport Sci. Med. 9: 17-26.
  3. Zhao L, Mi Y, Guan H, Xu Y, Mei Y. 2016. Velvet antler peptide prevents pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis via transforming growth factor (TGF)-${\beta}1$ pathway inhibition. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 783: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.04.039
  4. Hamdani AM, Wani IA, Bhat NA. 2019. Sources, structure, properties and health benefits of plant gums: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 135: 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.103
  5. Kang NJ, Jin HS, Lee SE, Kim HJ, Koh H, Lee DW. 2020. New approaches towards the discovery and evaluation of bioactive peptides from natural resources. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 50: 72-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1619376
  6. Ojha S, Aznar R, O'Donnell C, Tiwari BK. 2019. Ultrasound technology for the extraction of biologically active molecules from plant, animal and marine sources. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 122: 115663.
  7. Cheng SL, Jian YL, Chen CM, Liu BT. 2017. Relationships between antioxidants and quality characteristics from velvet antlers of formosan sambar deer. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 37: 542-551. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.4.542
  8. Wu F, Li H, Jin L, Li X, Ma Y, You J, et al. 2013. Deer antler base as a traditional Chinese medicine: a review of its traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 145: 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.008
  9. Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang XL, Xie QF. 2016. Purification and identification of anti-inflammatory peptides derived from simulated gastrointestinal digests of velvet antler protein (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus). J. Food Drug Anal. 24: 376-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2015.10.003
  10. Sui Z, Zhang L, Huo Y, Zhang Y. 2014. Bioactive components of velvet antlers and their pharmacological properties. J. Pharm. Biomed. 87: 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.07.044
  11. Pandey R, Prabhu AA, Dasu VV. 2018. Purification of recombinant human interferon gamma from fermentation broth using reverse micellar extraction: A process optimization study. Sep. Sci. Technol. 53: 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2017.1395463
  12. Melani Hariyadi D, Setyawan D, Suciati S, Chang HI, Suryawan IPGN, Utama AW. 2019. Extraction and preformulation study of deer antler velvet extract: physical characterization of aqueous and ethanol extract. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 9: 151-159.
  13. Rangsimawong W, Tansathien K, Wattanakul A, Ngawhirunpat T, Opanasopit P. 2019. Extraction method of protein and insulin-like growth factor-1 from deer antler velvets for skin rejuvenation. Key Eng. Mater. 819: 73-78. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.819.73
  14. Zhang Y, Zhang LZ, Lin Y, Zhou QL. 2013. Comparison of structure and biological activity of natural polypeptide from velvet antlers of Cervus elaphus with those of synthesized polypeptide. Chem. Res. Chinese U. 29: 924-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-013-3070-2
  15. Jin JH, Chun EH, Hyun JH, Choi SW, Su ST, Kim W, et al. 2015. Optimization of hot water extraction and ultra high pressure extraction for deer antler. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 24: 507-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0066-3
  16. Korean Food Standard Code (KMHW). 1997. Korean food standard code. p. 507. The Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare
  17. Warren L. 1959. Sialic acid in human semen and in the male genital tract. J. Clin. Invest. 38: 755-761. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI103856
  18. Kim JH, Yoo CJ, Sin KA, Jang SY, Park NY, Jeong YJ. 2011. Changes in properties of deer antler by proteolysis and extraction conditions. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 40: 89-93. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.1.089
  19. Lee BY, Lee OH, Choi HS. 2003. Analysis of food components of Korean deer antler parts. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 35: 52-56.
  20. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Frovenzano MD, et al. 1985. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Chem. 150: 79-85.
  21. Hassas-Roudsari M, Chang PR, Pegg RB, Tyler RT. 2009. Antioxidant capacity of bioactives extracted from canola meal by subcritical water, ethanolic and hot water extraction. Food Chem. 114: 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.097
  22. Lan YR, Huang S, Zhao F, Wu H, Guo Y. 2020. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis conditions for antioxidant peptide preparation from velvet antler collagen by response surface methodology. Chin. J. Process Eng. 20: 91-98.
  23. Liu YF, Oey I, Bremer P, Carne A, Silcock P. 2018. Bioactive peptides derived from egg proteins: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 58: 2508-2530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1329704
  24. Li X, Dang S, Yan C, Gong X, Wang J, Shi Y. 2013. Structure of a presenilin family intramembrane aspartate protease. Nature 493: 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11801
  25. Memarpoor-Yazdi M, Asoodeh A, Chamani J. 2012. A novel antioxidant and antimicrobial peptide from hen egg white lysozyme hydrolysates. J. Funct. Foods 4: 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011.12.004
  26. Sun X, Ganzle M, Field CJ, Wu J. 2016. Effect of proteolysis on the sialic acid content and bifidogenic activity of ovomucin hydrolysates. Food Chem. 212: 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.153
  27. Zhao L, Luo YC, Wang CT, Ji BP. 2011. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates from aqueous extract of velvet antler (Cervus elaphus) as influenced by molecular weight and enzymes. Nat. Prod. Commun. 6: 1683-1688.
  28. Spichtig V, Michaud J, Austin S. 2010. Determination of sialic acids in milks and milk-based products. Anal. Biochem. 405: 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.010
  29. Ding Y, Ko SC, Moon SH, Lee SH. 2019. Protective effects of novel antioxidant peptide purified from alcalase hydrolysate of velvet antler against oxidative stress in Chang liver cells in vitro and in a zebrafish model in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20: 5187. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205187
  30. Hedstrom L. 2002. Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev. 102: 4501-4524. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr000033x
  31. Radisky ES, Lee JM, Lu CJK, Koshland DE. 2006. Insights into the serine protease mechanism from atomic resolution structures of trypsin reaction intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6835-6840. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601910103
  32. Mamboya EAF. 2012. Papain, a plant enzyme of biological importance: A review. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2012.99.104
  33. Harrison MJ, Burton NA, Hillier IH. 1997. Catalytic mechanism of the enzyme papain: predictions with a hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical potential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119: 12285-12291. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9711472
  34. Papamichael EM, Theodorou LG, Bieth JG. 2004. Insight into catalytic mechanism of papain-like cysteine proteinases. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 118: 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:118:1-3:171
  35. Dunn BM. 2002. Structure and mechanism of the pepsin-like family of aspartic peptidases. Chem. Rev. 102: 4431-4458. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr010167q
  36. Fruton JS. 2002. A history of pepsin and related enzymes. Q. Rev. Biol. 77: 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1086/340729
  37. Bender ML, Kaiser ET. 1962. The mechanism of trypsin-catalyzed hydrolyses. the cinnamoyl-trypsin intermediate 1-3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84: 2556-2561. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00872a020
  38. Weiner SJ, Seibel GL, Kollman PA. 1986. The nature of enzyme catalysis in trypsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 649-653. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.3.649
  39. Yao N. 2017. Research on extraction and properties of antler plate collagen protein. Adv. Eng. Res. 107: 197-201.