Human Ecology Research

  • 제58권3호
  • /
  • Pages.343-356
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2982-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2982-6608(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가사 및 자녀돌봄 서비스 이용과 부부 간 노동 분담의 관계

Gender Differences in Contribution to Domestic Work and Childcare Associated with Outsourcing in Korea

  • 류수민 (매릴랜드 대학교 공공정책학과) ;
  • 김진희 (매릴랜드 대학교 가족학과)
  • Ryu, Soomin (School of Public Policy, University of Maryland-College Park) ;
  • Kim, Jinhee (Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland-College Park)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.20
  • 심사 : 2020.05.18
  • 발행 : 2020.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper examines the associations of having a helper for domestic work or childcare and time spent on it by couples in South Korea. We use five waves of panel survey data from the Korean Longitudinal Survey of Women and Families (KLoWF), which allows longitudinal changes within couples over time that account for potential selection effects and unobserved heterogeneity among individuals. With fixed effects, we find outsourcing is associated with a decrease in wife's time spent on domestic work or childcare by 1 hour per week. However, the decrease is concentrated on the unemployed wife's time, but not employed wife's time. In addition, outsourcing is not a significant factor for husband's time and the husband's share of total contribution. This may be because wives are the main provider of domestic work and childcare in Korea regardless of employment status or having any helper. Due to unequal contributions between husband and wife, using outsourcing also neither alleviates the employed wife's contribution nor changes the husband's contribution. However, the results may be underestimated because there are more common and diverse types of outsourcing in a broad sense, such as going out for dinner, buying prepared food, and using dry cleaning services. We expect future studies to consider more broad types of outsourcing and examine how relations with the couple's time use at home are different by type.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Altintas, E. & Sullivan, O. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Crossnational gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35 (16), 455-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.16
  2. Bergmann, B. (2005). The economic emergence of women (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  3. Bittman, M., Meagher, G., & Matheson, G. (1999). The changing boundary between home and market. Australian trends in outsourcing domestic labour. Work, Employment and Society, 13 (2), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500179922117935
  4. Cai, L. & Lee, K. Y. (2004). A study of dual-earner couple's household work time and life satisfaction. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 22 (5), 265-281.
  5. Cha, S. E. (2015). Differential in married women's perceived time pressure by employment: Testing the effects of couple time use and housework outsourcing. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 33 (5), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2015.33.5.37
  6. Chan, A. H. (2005). Live-in foreign domestic workers and their impact on Hong Kong's middle-class families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26 (4), 509-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-005-7847-4
  7. Cheng, A. K. (2014). Hiring domestic help and family well-being in Hong Kong: A propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45 (4), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.45.4.475
  8. Cheung, A. K., & Kim, E. H. (2018). Domestic labor, attitudes, and women's marital satisfaction: A longitudinal study in Korea, Journal of Family Issues, 39 (16), 3931-3955. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18800813
  9. Choi, H, J. (2016). Childcare and its policy implications: A developmental milestones approach. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 236 (1), 51-67.
  10. Choi, J. H. (2006). Family stress and family strengths in double-income couples. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 44 (6), 47-58.
  11. Ciabattari, T. (2004). Cohabitation and domestic work: The effects of marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66 (1), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00008.x-i1
  12. Cohen, P. N. (1998). Replacing housework in the service economy. Gender and Society, 12, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124398012002006
  13. Constable, N. (2007). Maid to order in Hong Kong: Stories of migrant workers. New York: Cornell University Press.
  14. Cornelisse-Vermaat, J. R., Van Ophem, J. A. C., Antonides, G. & Van Den Brink, H. M. (2013). Outsourcing childcare, home cleaning and meal preparation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37 (5), 530-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12018
  15. Cortes, P., & Pan, J. (2013). Outsourcing household production: Foreign domestic workers and native labor supply in Hong Kong. Journal of Labor Economics 31 (2), 329-371. https://doi.org/10.1086/668675
  16. Craig, L., & Baxter, J. (2016). Domestic outsourcing, housework shares and subjective time pressure: gender differences in the correlates of hiring help. Social Indicators Research, 125 (1), 271-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0833-1
  17. De Ruijter, E. & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). Effects of job features on domestic outsourcing as a strategy for combining paid and domestic work. Work and Occupations, 34 (2), 205-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888406296510
  18. EstevezAbe M. & Kim, Y.S. (2013). Beyond the familialist state? Outsourcing care in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, 343, 1-28.
  19. Eun, K. S. (2009). Household division of labor for married men and women in Korea. Korea Journal of Population, 32 (3), 145-171.
  20. Fuchs, E., Kasahara, T., & Saaler, S. (2018). A new modern history of East Asia, Gottingen: V&R unipress GmbH.
  21. Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries, The American Sociological Review, 69 (6), 751-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900601
  22. Geist, C., & Cohen, P. (2011). Headed toward equality? housework change in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73 (4), 832-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00850.x
  23. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25 (4), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092933
  24. Gupta, S., & Ash, M. (2008). Whose money, whose Time? A nonparamentric approach to modelling time spent on housework in the United States. Feminist Economics, 14 (1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700701716664
  25. Hank, K., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2003). A multilevel analysis of child care and women's fertility decisions in Western Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65 (3), 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00584.x
  26. Hazan, M., & Zoabi, H. (2014). Do highly-educated women choose smaller families? The Economic Journal, 125 (587), 1191-1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12148
  27. Heo, S. Y. (2008). Research on time use for housework of women and men in double income households. Korea Women Studies, 24 (3), 177-210.
  28. Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. California: University of California Press.
  29. Hook, L. K. (2006). Care in context: Men's unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. American Sociological Review, 71 (4), 639-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100406
  30. Hsu, P. C. (2010). Provider, helper, or free rider? Gender structure and gender inequality in household labor in East Asia. Journal of Political Science & Sociology, 13, 49-70.
  31. Islam, M. R., & Cojocaru, S. (2015). Migrant domestic workers in Asia: Transnational variations and policy concerns. International Migration, 54 (1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12201
  32. Iwai, N. (2017). Division of domestic work in Japan, South Korea, China and Taiwan. In M. Tsai & W. Chen (Ed.), Family, work and wellbeing in Asia 9 (pp. 107-127). Singapore: Springer.
  33. Jang, Y. O., & Jeong, S. R. (2012). The influences of variables related to family and employment on work, family spillover in working wives and children. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 30 (5), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.5.075
  34. Kan, M. Y. & Hertog, E. (2017). Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Demographic Research, 36 (18), 557-588. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.18
  35. Kamo, Y. (1988). Determinants of household division of labor: resources, power, and ideology. Journal of Family Issues, 9 (2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251388009002002
  36. Kamo, Y. (2000). He Said, she said: Assessing discrepancies in husbands' and wives' reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 29 (4), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2000.0674
  37. Killewald, A. (2011). Opting out and buying out: Wives' earnings and housework time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73 (2), 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00818.x
  38. Kim, E. H. (2017). Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea. Demographic Research, 37(24), 743-768. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.24
  39. Kim, H. K. (2009). Analyzing the gender division of labor: The cases of the United States and South Korea, Asian Perspective, 33 (2), 181-229. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2009.0022
  40. Ko, J. Y. (2007). The South Korean experience in economic development. In G. Leclerc & C. A. S. Hall (Eds.), Making world development work: Scientific alternatives to neoclassical economic theory (pp.127-141). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  41. Kornrich S. (2012). Hiring help for the home: Household services in the twentieth century. Journal of Family History, 37 (2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199011432539
  42. Lan, P. C. (2003). Maid or madam? Filipina migrant workers and the continuity of domestic labor. Gender & Society, 17 (2), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202250730
  43. Michel S., & Peng, I. (2017). Caring around the Pacific rim- introduction. In S. Michel & I. Peng (Eds.), Gender, Migration and the work of care: A multi-scalar approach to the Pacific rim (pp. 13-32). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Moon, S. H. (2012). Effects of marriage and family values on the marriage intention and expected marriage age of unmarried young women, Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 17 (3), 5-25.
  45. Nakhaie, M. R. (1995). Housework in Canada: The national picture. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24 (3), 409-425.
  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Closing the gender gap: Act now. Paris, France: OECD.
  47. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle. Paris, France: OECD.
  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Retrieve February 19, 2020, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS
  49. Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2013). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34 (2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9321-4
  50. Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59 (3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095938
  51. Qian, Y., & Sayer, L. C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78 (2), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12274
  52. Raz-Yurovich, L. (2014). A transaction cost approach to outsourcing by households. Population and Development Review, 40 (2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00674.x
  53. Sayer, L. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women's and men's paid work, unpaid work, and free time. Social Forces, 84 (1), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0126
  54. Sung, S. (2017). Women's experiences of balancing work and family care in South Korea: Continuity and change. In M. Najafizadeh & L. Lindsey (Ed.), Women of Asia: Globalization, development, and gender equity. New York: Routledge.
  55. Sullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  56. Sullivan, O. & Gershuny, J. (2013). Domestic outsourcing and multitasking: How much do they really contribute? Social Science Research, 42 (5), 1311-1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.05.004
  57. Treas, J. (2010). Why study housework? In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: men, women, and household work in crossnational perspective (pp. 3-18). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  58. Vandelannoote, D., Vanleenhove, P., Decoster, A., Ghysels, J., & Verbist, G. (2014). Maternal employment: The impact of triple rationing in childcare. Review of Economics of the Household, 13 (3), 685-707. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261611
  59. Van der Lippe, T., Frey, V., & Tsvetkova, M. (2012). Outsourcing of domestic tasks: A matter of preferences? Journal of Family Issues, 34 (12), 1574-1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12468099
  60. Van der Lippe, T., Tijdens, K., & De Ruijter, E. (2004). Outsourcing of domestic tasks and timesaving effects. Journal of Family Issues, 25 (2), 216-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03257425
  61. Windebank, J. (2007). Outsourcing women's domestic labour: The Che'que Emploi-Service Universel in France. Journal of European Social Policy, 17 (3), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707078368
  62. Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The influence of a supportive environment for families on women's fertility intentions and behavior in South Korea. Demographic Research, 36 (7), 227-254. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.7
  63. Zhang, Z. (2017). Division of housework in transitional urban China. Chinese Sociological Review, 49 (3), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2017.12958

피인용 문헌

  1. The influence of time, resource, and gender ideology on the division of domestic work in Korea vol.55, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12385