Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Supraeruption as a consideration for implant restoration

  • Lee, Bo-Ah (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Byoungheon (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Taek (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.12.23
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence, amount, and rate of supraeruption of the maxillary second molar according to sex, age, and history of periodontitis. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the charts and panoramic radiographs of 65 patients who were scheduled to undergo implant placement at the site of the mandibular second molar. The amount of supraeruption of the maxillary second molar and the alveolar bone level of the neighboring teeth were measured on digital panoramic radiographs. The prevalence was evaluated in each group, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors influencing the prevalence of supraeruption. The amount and the rate of supraeruption were compared between pairs of groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. For all tests, P values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Supraeruption occurred in 78% of the patients. The prevalence of supraeruption was affected by sex, age, and history of periodontitis. The mean amount of supraeruption was 0.91 mm and the mean rate of supraeruption was 0.14 mm/month. The amount and the rate of supraeruption showed no significant differences according to sex, age, or the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the alveolar bone crest (P>0.05). Conclusions: These results show that the amount of supraeruption on the maxillary second molar was similar to the thickness of the enamel on the occlusal surface. When a single implant is scheduled to be placed on the mandibular second molar, supraeruption of the antagonist should be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Carlson H. Studies on the rate and amount of eruption of certain human teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1944-1945;42:78-91.
  2. Compagnon D, Woda A. Supraeruption of the unopposed maxillary first molar. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90347-Y
  3. Kiliaridis S, Lyka I, Friede H, Carlsson GE, Ahlqwist M. Vertical position, rotation, and tipping of molars without antagonists. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:480-6.
  4. Christou P, Kiliaridis S. Three-dimensional changes in the position of unopposed molars in adults. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:543-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm036
  5. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, Blance A. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth. J Prosthodont 2007;16:485-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00212.x
  6. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Implant Dent 2005;14:312-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000188375.76066.23
  7. Lee BA, Kim BH, Kweon HHI, Kim YT. The prosthetic abutment height can affect marginal bone loss around dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:799-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12648
  8. Lee JH, Kweon HH, Choi SH, Kim YT. Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:396-404. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396
  9. Craddock HL, Youngson CC. A study of the incidence of overeruption and occlusal interferences in unopposed posterior teeth. Br Dent J 2004;196:341-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811082
  10. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
  11. Fu JH, Hsu YT, Wang HL. Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012;5 Suppl:S91-103.
  12. Sheridan RA, Decker AM, Plonka AB, Wang HL. The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant Dent 2016;25:829-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000488
  13. Zarb GA. Prosthodontic treatment for partially edentulous patients. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 1978.
  14. Baumgaertel S, Smuthkochorn S, Palomo JM. Intrusion method for a single overerupted maxillary molar using only palatal mini-implants and partial fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:411-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.016
  15. Mopsik ER, Buck RP, Connors JO, Watts LN. Surgical intervention to reestablish adequate intermaxillary space before fixed or removable prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;95:957-60. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0176
  16. Lindskog-Stokland B, Hansen K, Tomasi C, Hakeberg M, Wennstrom JL. Changes in molar position associated with missing opposed and/or adjacent tooth: a 12-year study in women. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02252.x
  17. Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, Blance A. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 2. Clinical parameters associated with movement of teeth adjacent to the site of posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont 2007;16:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00223.x
  18. Petridis HP, Tsiggos N, Michail A, Kafantaris SN, Hatzikyriakos A, Kafantaris NM. Three-dimensional positional changes of teeth adjacent to posterior edentulous spaces in relation to age at time of tooth loss and elapsed time. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2010;18:78-83.
  19. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961;32:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261
  20. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, et al. Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol 2018;89 Suppl 1:S173-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0721
  21. Silva N, Abusleme L, Bravo D, Dutzan N, Garcia-Sesnich J, Vernal R, et al. Host response mechanisms in periodontal diseases. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23:329-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140259
  22. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4
  23. Bassir SH, El Kholy K, Chen CY, Lee KH, Intini G. Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2019;90:493-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0338
  24. Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:106-34.
  25. Huynh-Ba G, Oates TW, Williams MAH. Immediate loading vs. early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients' perspective: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:255-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13278
  26. Pfeiffer P, Bewersdorf S, Schmage P. The effect of changes in head position on enlargement of structures during panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:55-63.
  27. Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt MR, Major PW, Carey JP, Heo G. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar
  28. Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, Kwon YD. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:669-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820745a7
  29. Kaplan P. Drifting, tipping, supraeruption, and segmental alveolar bone growth. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:280-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90305-1