DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of core design on fracture resistance of zirconia-lithium disilicate anterior bilayered crowns

  • Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2020.02.25
  • Accepted : 2020.05.22
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The effect of core design on the fracture resistance of zirconia-lithium disilicate (LS2) bilayered crowns for anterior teeth is evaluated by comparing with that of metal-ceramic crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty customized titanium abutments for maxillary central incisor were prepared. Each group of 10 units was constructed using the same veneer form of designs A and B, which covered labial surface to approximately one third of the incisal and cervical palatal surface, respectively. LS2 pressed-on-zirconia (POZ) and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns were divided into "POZ_A," "POZ_B," "PFM_A," and "PFM_B" groups, and 6000 thermal cycles (5/55 ℃) were performed after 24 h storage in distilled water at 37 ℃. All specimens were prepared using a single type of self-adhesive resin cement. The fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure mode and elemental analyses of the bonding interface were performed. The data were analyzed using Welch's t-test and the Games-Howell exact test. RESULTS. The PFM_B (1376. 8 ± 93.3 N) group demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength than the PFM_A (915.8 ± 206.3 N) and POZ_B (963.8 ± 316.2 N) groups (P<.05). There was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance between the POZ_A (1184.4 ± 319.6 N) and POZ_B groups (P>.05). Regardless of the design differences of the zirconia cores, fractures involving cores occurred in all specimens of the POZ groups. CONCLUSION. The bilayered anterior POZ crowns showed different fracture resistance and fracture pattern according to the core design compared to PFM.

Keywords

References

  1. Sicilia A, Quirynen M, Fontolliet A, Francisco H, Friedman A, Linkevicius T, Lutz R, Meijer HJ, Rompen E, Rotundo R, Schwarz F, Simion M, Teughels W, Wennerberg A, Zuhr O. Long-term stability of peri-implant tissues after bone or soft tissue augmentation. Effect of zirconia or titanium abutments on peri-implant soft tissues. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:148-52.
  2. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:641-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02094.x
  3. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ulusoy M. Comparison of the translucency of shaded zirconia all-ceramic systems. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:415-22. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.415
  4. McLaren EA, Giordano RA. Zirconia-based ceramics: Material properties, esthetics, and layering techniques of a new veneering porcelain, VM9. Quintessence Dent Technol 2005;28:100.
  5. Napankangas R, Pihlaja J, Raustia A. Outcome of zirconia single crowns made by predoctoral dental students: A clinical retrospective study after 2 to 6 years of clinical service. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:289-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.025
  6. Haff A, Lof H, Gunne J, Sjogren G. A retrospective evaluation of zirconia-fixed partial dentures in general practices: An up to 13-year study. Dent Mater 2015;31:162-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.009
  7. Pihlaja J, Napankangas R, Raustia A. Outcome of zirconia partial fixed dental prostheses made by predoctoral dental students: A clinical retrospective study after 3 to 7 years of clinical service. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:40-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.026
  8. Sola-Ruiz MF, Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Labaig-Rueda C. A prospective evaluation of zirconia anterior partial fixed dental prostheses: Clinical results after seven years. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:578-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.015
  9. Chaar MS, Passia N, Kern M. Ten-year clinical outcome of three-unit posterior FDPs made from a glass-infiltrated zirconia reinforced alumina ceramic (In-ceram zirconia). J Dent 2015;43:512-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.016
  10. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  11. Turk AG, Ulusoy M, Yuce M, Akin H. Effect of different veneering techniques on the fracture strength of metal and zirconia frameworks. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7:454-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.454
  12. Choi JW, Kim SY, Bae JH, Bae EB, Huh JB. In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:244-51. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.244
  13. Lim CH, Jang YS, Lee MH, Bae TS. Evaluation of fracture strength for single crowns made of the different types of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Odontology 2020;108:231-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00460-4
  14. Kim JH, Ko KH, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effects of the thickness ratio of zirconia-lithium disilicate bilayered ceramics on the translucency and flexural strength. J Prosthodont 2020;29:334-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13136
  15. Wang G, Zhang S, Kong H. Effect of thickness ratio on loadbearing capacity of bilayered dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2015;24:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12169
  16. Wang G, Zhang S, Bian C, Kong H. Interface toughness of a zirconia-veneer system and the effect of a liner application. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:576-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.010
  17. Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Yi YJ, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS. Effect of various intermediate ceramic layers on the interfacial stability of zirconia core and veneering ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:488-95. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.986755
  18. Kim SH, Park CJ, Cho LR, Huh YH. Evaluation of the ceramic liner bonding effect between zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:282-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.022
  19. Lee ES, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effect of silica-containing glass-ceramic liner treatment on zirconia coping retention. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:732-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.005
  20. Lee YH, Park CJ, Cho LR, Ko KH, Huh YH. Effects of lithium and phosphorus on the efficacy of a liner for increasing the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2018;20:535-40.
  21. Jo EH, Huh YH, Ko KH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effect of liners and primers on tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:374-80. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.374
  22. Jeong ID, Bae SY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Translucency of zirconia-based pressable ceramics with different core and veneer thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:768-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.003
  23. Sinmazisik G, Tarcin B, Demirbas B, Gulmez T, Bor E, Ozer F. The effect of zirconia thickness on the biaxial flexural strength of zirconiaceramic bilayered discs. Dent Mater J 2015;34:640-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-340
  24. Woods JA, Cavazos E. Effects of porcelain-metal junction angulation on porcelain fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:501-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90421-4
  25. Hobo S, Shillingburg HT Jr. Porcelain fused to metal: Tooth preparation and coping design. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90075-9