Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth

  • Received : 2020.02.28
  • Accepted : 2020.06.16
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic analysis of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with cast metal posts (CMPs) or prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) and crowns. Materials and Methods: Fifty ETT were restored with 25 CMPs and 25 GFPs at a private dental clinic between 2001 and 2016. The restorations consisted of 12 all-ceramic crowns, 31 metal-ceramic crowns, and 7 composite resin crowns. Demographic data, type of teeth, type of post-and-core system, time of placement, crown restorations, the number of proximal contacts, the type of antagonist, and reports of any complications after post-and-core placement were recorded for each patient. Assessments were performed at baseline (radiographic) and follow-up (radiographic and clinical). Data were analyzed by the McNemar test, the Pearson χ2 test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves (α = 0.05). The mean follow-up was 67.6 months. Results: No significant difference was observed for any of the radiographic parameters when the baseline and final radiographs were compared. In the clinical evaluation, anatomical form (p = 0.009) and occlusion (p = 0.001) showed significant differences according to the type of crown restoration; specifically, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns outperformed composite resin crowns. Conclusions: CMPs and GFPs showed favorable results for restoring ETT after 6 years of follow-up. All-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns showed higher survival rates and better clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research project from Centro de Pesquisa da Universidade Positivo was funded with public resources obtained through the "Public Call 15/2017" - Fundacao Araucaria/Secretaria de Estado da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior do Parana (SETI), grant #15.561.033-6.

References

  1. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:611-619.
  2. Scotti N, Eruli C, Comba A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: a retrospective clinical study. J Dent 2015;43:499-505.
  3. Mosharraf R, Ranjbarian P. Effects of post surface conditioning before silanization on bond strength between fiber post and resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:126-132.
  4. Novais VR, Simamotos Junior PC, Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ. Bond strength between fiber posts and composite resin core: influence of temperature on silane coupling agents. Braz Dent J 2012;23:8-14.
  5. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:556-562.
  6. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MG, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:69-74.
  7. Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD009109.
  8. Liu C, Liu H, Qian YT, Zhu S, Zhao SQ. The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post. Int J Oral Sci 2014;6:56-60.
  9. Murali Mohan S, Mahesh Gowda E, Shashidhar MP. Clinical evaluation of the fiber post and direct composite resin restoration for fixed single crowns on endodontically treated teeth. Med J Armed Forces India 2015;71:259-264.
  10. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005;33:305-312.
  11. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
  12. Abduljabbar T, Sherfudhin H, AlSaleh SA, Al-Helal AA, Al-Orini SS, Al-Aql NA. Fracture resistance of three post and core systems in endodontically treated teeth restored with all-ceramic crowns. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci 2012;3:33-38.
  13. Ree M, Schwartz RS. The endo-restorative interface: current concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:345-374.
  14. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:519-524.
  15. Ghavamnasiri M, Maleknejad F, Ameri H, Moghaddas MJ, Farzaneh F, Chasteen JE. A retrospective clinical evaluation of success rate in endodontic-treated premolars restored with composite resin and fiber reinforced composite posts. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:378-382.
  16. Parisi C, Valandro LF, Ciocca L, Gatto MR, Baldissara P. Clinical outcomes and success rates of quartz fiber post restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:367-372.
  17. Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans MC, Pereira-Cenci T. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2016;48:34-39.
  18. Barabanti N, Preti A, Vano M, Derchi G, Mangani F, Cerutti A. Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: a ten years follow up clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:e54-e59.
  19. Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:80-90.
  20. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
  21. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
  22. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-13B.
  23. Weigl P, Sander A, Wu Y, Felber R, Lauer HC, Rosentritt M. In-vitro performance and fracture strength of thin monolithic zirconia crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:79-84.
  24. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, Tay F. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007;20:287-291.
  25. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:173-178.
  26. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:458-467.
  27. Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1995;21:57-61.
  28. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-335.
  29. Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015;41:309-316.
  30. Elagra MI, Rayyan MR, Alhomaidhi MM, Alanaziy AA, Alnefaie MO. Color stability and marginal integrity of interim crowns: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2017;11:330-334.
  31. Zenthofer A, Rammelsberg P, Schmitt C, Ohlmann B. Wear of metal-free resin composite crowns after three years in service. Dent Mater J 2013;32:787-792.
  32. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-1754.
  33. Ohlmann B, Trame JP, Dreyhaupt J, Gabbert O, Koob A, Rammelsberg P. Wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns after 2 years. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:782-788.
  34. Asghar S, Ali A, Rashid S, Hussain T. Replacement of resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010;20:639-643.
  35. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
  36. Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:135-142.
  37. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:297-301.
  38. Rinke S, Schafer S, Lange K, Gersdorff N, Roediger M. Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3-year results. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:228-237.
  39. Cehreli MC, Kokat AM, Ozpay C, Karasoy D, Akca K. A randomized controlled clinical trial of feldspathic versus glass-infiltrated alumina all-ceramic crowns: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:77-84.
  40. Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:357-365.