DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bioblock technique to treat severe internal resorption with subsequent periapical pathology: a case report

  • Mark Frater (Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, University of Szeged Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Tekla Sary (Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, University of Szeged Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Sufyan Garoushi (Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Center, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku)
  • Received : 2020.04.02
  • Accepted : 2020.05.27
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

A variety of therapeutic modalities can be used for the endodontic treatment of a traumatized tooth with internal root resorption (IRR). The authors present a case report of the successful restoration of a traumatized upper central incisor that was weakened due to severe IRR and subsequent periapical lesion formation. A 20-year-old female patient was referred to our clinic with severe internal resorption and subsequent periapical pathosis destroying the buccal bone wall. Root canal treatment had been initiated previously at another dental practice, but at that time, the patient's condition could not be managed even with several treatments. After cone-beam computed tomography imaging and proper chemomechanical cleaning, the tooth was managed with a mineral trioxide aggregate plug followed by root canal filling using short fiber-reinforced composite, known as the Bioblock technique. This report is the first documentation of the use of the Bioblock technique in the restoration of a traumatized tooth. The Bioblock technique appears to be ideal for restoring wide irregular root canals, as in cases of severe internal resorption, because it can uniquely fill out the hollow irregularities of the canal. However, further long-term clinical investigations are required to provide additional information about this new technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Kaval ME, Guneri P, Caliskan MK. Regenerative endodontic treatment of perforated internal root resorption: a case report. Int Endod J 2018;51:128-137.
  2. Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: a review. J Endod 2010;36:1107-1121.
  3. Aktemur Turker S, Uzunoglu E, Deniz Sungur D, Tek V. Fracture resistance of teeth with simulated perforating internal resorption cavities repaired with different calcium silicate-based cements and backfilling materials. J Endod 2018;44:860-863.
  4. Abuabara A, Costa RG, Morais EC, Furuse AY, Gonzaga CC, Filho FB. Prosthetic rehabilitation and management of an MTA-treated maxillary central incisor with root perforation and severe internal resorption. J Prosthodont 2013;22:413-418.
  5. Bendyk-Szeffer M, Lagocka R, Trusewicz M, Lipski M, Buczkowska-Radlinska J. Perforating internal root resorption repaired with mineral trioxide aggregate caused complete resolution of odontogenic sinus mucositis: a case report. J Endod 2015;41:274-278.
  6. Kucukkaya Eren S, Aksel H, Askerbeyli Ors S, Serper A, Kocak Y, Ocak M, Celik HH. Obturation quality of calcium silicate-based cements placed with different techniques in teeth with perforating internal root resorption: a micro-computed tomographic study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:805-811.
  7. Yildirim S, Elbay M. Multidisciplinary treatment approach for perforated internal root resorption: three-year follow-up. Case Rep Dent 2019;2019:5848272.
  8. Jacobovitz M, de Lima RK. Treatment of inflammatory internal root resorption with mineral trioxide aggregate: a case report. Int Endod J 2008;41:905-912.
  9. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, Tay F. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007;20:287-291.
  10. Paolone G, Saracinelli M, Devoto W, Putignano A. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013;8:44-67.
  11. Frater M, Forster A, Jantyik A, Braunitzer G, Nagy K, Grandini S. In vitro fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with fibre-reinforced composite posts using a single or a multi-post technique. Aust Endod J 2017;43:16-22.
  12. Dal Piva AM, Tribst JP, Borges AL, Bottino MA, Souza RO. Do mechanical advantages exist in relining fiber posts with composite prior to its cementation? J Adhes Dent 2018;20:511-518.
  13. Bijelic J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short fiber reinforced composite in restoring severely damaged incisors. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1221-1231.
  14. Forster A, Sar y T, Braunitzer G, Frater M. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with a direct layered fiber-reinforced composite post and core. J Adhes Sci Technol 2017;31:1454-1466.
  15. Frater M, Lassila L, Braunitzer G, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:265-276.
  16. Akman S, Akman M, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth. Int Endod J 2011;44:407-415.
  17. Turkaslan S, Bagis B, Akan E, Mutluay MM, Vallittu PK. Fracture strengths of chair-side-generated veneers cemented with glass fibers. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:240-246.
  18. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod 2012;38:11-19.
  19. Lassila L, Sailynoja E, Prinssi R, Vallittu P, Garoushi S. Characterization of a new fiber-reinforced flowable composite. Odontology 2019;107:342-352.
  20. Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Mechanical properties, fracture resistance, and fatigue limits of short fiber reinforced dental composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:95-102.
  21. Frater M, Forster A, Kereszturi M, Braunitzer G, Nagy K. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material. J Dent 2014;42:1143-1150.
  22. Sar y T, Garoushi S, Braunitzer G, Alleman D, Volom A, Frater M. Fracture behaviour of MOD restorations reinforced by various fibre-reinforced techniques - An in vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;98:348-356.
  23. Vallittu PK. Are we misusing fiber posts? Guest editorial. Dent Mater 2016;32:125-126.
  24. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G, Karbhari V. Monoblocks in root canals: a finite elemental stress analysis study. Int Endod J 2011;44:817-826.
  25. Garoushi S, Gargoum A, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. J Investig Clin Dent 2018;9:e12330.
  26. Lempel E, Ori Z, Szalma J, Lovasz BV, Kiss A, Toth A, Kunsagi-Mate S. Effect of exposure time and preheating on the conversion degree of conventional, bulk-fill, fiber reinforced and polyacid-modified resin composites. Dent Mater 2019;35:217-228.
  27. Seyam RS, Mobarak EH. Reinforcement of teeth with simulated coronal fracture and immature weakened roots using resin composite cured by a modified layering technique. Oper Dent 2014;39:E128-E136.
  28. Galhano GA, de Melo RM, Barbosa SH, Zamboni SC, Bottino MA, Scotti R. Evaluation of light transmission through translucent and opaque posts. Oper Dent 2008;33:321-324.
  29. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Panyayong W, Tagami J. Effects of photocuring strategy on bonding of dual-cure one-step self-etch adhesive to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J 2009;28:133-141.
  30. Bell-Ronnlof AL, Jaatinen J, Lassila L, Narhi T, Vallittu P. Transmission of light through fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater J 2019;38:928-933.
  31. Frater M, Sar y T, Nema V, Braunitzer G, Vallittu P, Lassila L, Garoushi S. Fatigue failure load of immature anterior teeth: influence of different fiber post-core systems. Odontology 2020 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00522-y. [Epub ahead of print]
  32. Linsuwanont P, Kulvitit S, Santiwong B. Reinforcement of simulated immature permanent teeth after mineral trioxide aggregate apexification. J Endod 2018;44:163-167.