대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제47권3호
  • /
  • Pages.293-302
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학생 설문을 통한 가상현실 치아우식 시뮬레이션의 평가

Evaluation of Virtual Reality Simulation of Dental Caries through Student Questionnaire

  • 김병기 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 류지헌 (전남대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 김재환 (아이빛주니어치과) ;
  • 김선미 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최남기 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Kim, Byunggee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ryu, Jeeheon (Department of Education, College of Education, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Jaehwan (I Bit Junior Dental Clinic) ;
  • Kim, Seonmi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Namki (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.22
  • 심사 : 2020.03.12
  • 발행 : 2020.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 가상현실 시뮬레이션을 이용한 소아환자 치아우식 진단 경험에 대한 설문조사를 통하여, 임상 실습 전 단계의 치의학 전공 학생들을 대상으로 소아치과적 교육에서의 활용 가능성을 평가하는 것이다. 소아 환자 모델로 유치열기의 5세 여아를 개발하였고, 가상현실 속 진단을 위한 치아 우식 모델을 제작하였다. 치의학 전공 학생들은 15분에 걸친 치아 우식 진단 시뮬레이션을 경험한 뒤, 설문지를 통하여 프로그램 사용 경험을 통한 실재감 및 응용 가능성을 평가하였다. 그 결과, 가상실재감과 외양 평가에서 높은 점수를 얻었다. 또한, 가상현실을 통한 치아 우식 진단 시뮬레이션은 임상 실습 전, 후의 학년, 성별, 가상현실 체험 경험의 유무에 따른 유의미한 차이가 없다는 설문 결과를 얻었다. 이 프로그램을 지속적으로 발전시킨다면, 치의학 교육 분야에 응용 가능성이 높아질 것이다.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of virtual reality simulation after experience of dental caries diagnosis for dental students before exposing to clinical pediatric practice. A pediatric patient model of a five-year-old child with primary dentition was developed and a caries model that is amenable to VR(virtual reality) diagnosis was organized and set-up. The dental student's were allowed to use the simulated model for fifteen minutes and their experiences were evaluated using a self-reported questionnaire to evaluate presence and usability of this application. Overall, virtual presence and appearance area of the simulation were highly scored. The result indicates that the VR model has no significant difference from the actual clinical caries regardless of grade of students, gender and VR experience. If the prototype is continuously advanced, its applicability in dental education will increase.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Huang TK, Yang CH, Hung CC, et al. : Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applied in dentistry. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 34:243-248, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.009
  2. Kwon HB, Park YS, Han JS : Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective. Acta Odontol Scand, 76:497-503, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1441437
  3. Joda T, Gallucci GO, Wismeijer D, Zitzmann NU : Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review. Comput Biol Med, 108:93-100, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.012
  4. Eve EJ, Koo S, Karimbux NY, et al. : Performance of dental students versus prosthodontics residents on a 3D immersive haptic simulator. J Dent Educ, 78:630-637, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05715.x
  5. Correa CG, Machado MAAM, Nunes FLS, et al. : Virtual Reality simulator for dental anesthesia training in the inferior alveolar nerve block. J Appl Oral Sci, 25:357-366, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0386
  6. Rich JP, Straffon L, Inglehart MR : General dentists and pediatric dental patients: the role of dental education. J Dent Educ, 70:1308-1315, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.12.tb04233.x
  7. Raghav K, Van Wijk AJ, De Jongh A, et al. : Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for treatment of dental phobia: a randomized control trial. BMC Oral Health, 16:25, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0186-z
  8. Banting D, Eggertsson H, Sohn W, et al. : Rationale and evidence for the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS II). Ann Arbor, 1001:48109-1078, 2005.
  9. Young DA, Novy BB, Kuehne J, et al. : The American Dental Association caries classification system for clinical practice: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc, 146:79-86, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.018
  10. Zandona AF, Zero DT : Diagnostic tools for early caries detection. J Am Dent Assoc, 137:1675-1684, 2006. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0113
  11. Witmer BG, Singer MJ : Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ, 7:225-240, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
  12. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H : The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ, 10:266-281, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603
  13. Ryu J, Yu S : The effects of scenario types on teacher efficacy of pre-service teachers and virtual presence in the virtual reality based teaching simulation. J Korean Assoc Inf Medi, 22:661-680, 2016.
  14. Schrader C, Bastiaens TJ : The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Comput Human Behav, 28:648-658, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.011
  15. Usoh M, Catena E, Arman S, Slater M : Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ, 9:497-503, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566989
  16. Won MJ, Park SI, Whang MC, et al. : A study on evaluation of visual factor for measuring subjective virtual realization. Sci Emot, 15:389-398, 2012.
  17. Ryu J, Yu S : The effects of head mounted display on timeon-task and virtual presence for navigational tasks in the immersive virtual reality. Sci Emot, 19:71-80, 2016.
  18. Rossen B, Lok B : A crowdsourcing method to develop virtual human conversational agents. Int J Hum-comput St, 70:301-319, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.11.004
  19. Norman G : Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ, 15:625-632, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  20. Jamieson S : Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ, 38:1217-1218, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
  21. Roy E, Bakr MM, George R : The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review. The Saudi Dent J, 29:41-47, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.02.001
  22. Beeson SA, Kring DL : The effects of two teaching methods on nursing students' factual knowledge and performance of psychomotor skills. J Nurs Educ, 38:357-359, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19991101-06
  23. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S : Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med, 78:783-788, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006
  24. You EY : Medical Simulation. J Korean Med Assoc, 48:267-276, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2005.48.3.267
  25. Rourke S : How does virtual reality simulation compare to simulated practice in the acquisition of clinical psychomotor skills for pre-registration student nurses? A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud, 102:103466, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103466
  26. Albrecht UV, Folta-Schoofs K, Behrends M, Von Jan U : Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. J Med Internet Res, 15:e182, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2497
  27. Rojas D, Kapralos B, Dubrowski A : Improving the acquisition of basic technical surgical skills with VR-based simulation coupled with computer-based video instruction. Stud Health Technol Inform, 220:323-328, 2016.
  28. Luciano C, Banerjee, P, DeFanti T : Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator. Virtual reality, 13:69-85, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-009-0112-7
  29. Towers, A. Field J, Martin N, et al. : A scoping review of the use and application of virtual reality in pre-clinical dental education. Br Dent J, 226:358-366, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0041-0
  30. Clark GT, Suri A, Enciso R : Autonomous virtual patients in dentistry: system accuracy and expert versus novice comparison. J Dent Educ, 76:1365-1370, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.10.tb05392.x
  31. Murbay S, Chang JWW, Yeung S, Neelakantan P : Evaluation of the introduction of a dental virtual simulator on the performance of undergraduate dental students in the preclinical operative dentistry course. Eur J Dent Educ, 24:5-16, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12453
  32. Llena C, Folguera S, Rodriguez-Lozano FJ : Implementation of augmented reality in operative dentistry learning. Eur J Dent Educ, 22: e122-130, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12269
  33. Ryu J, Yang E : The effect of classroom scenario and taskdisplay method on user experience in teaching simulation. The Educ Res for Tmrw, 32:99-118, 2019.