Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Related to Techno-stress Perceived by Elementary School Teachers in a Flipped Learning Environment

플립드러닝 환경에서 초등 교사가 지각하는 테크노스트레스 관련 변인

  • Received : 2020.03.31
  • Accepted : 2020.04.16
  • Published : 2020.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between techno-stress perceived by elementary school teachers and related variables in a flipped learning environment. To achieve the purpose, the following research question have been established: First, what is the difference between techno-stress perceived by elementary school teachers? Second, what is the difference between techno-stress related variables perceived by elementary school teachers? Third, how do the TPACK, teacher effectiveness, and school environment support, perceived by elementary school teachers, affect technostress? 207 teachers at elementary school responded on a questionnaire to measure their perceived techno-stress, TPACK, teacher efficacy, and school environment support. Data were analyzed with using independent two-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. The results were as follows: First, the elementary school teachers working on a leading school perceived higher techno-overload and techno-complexity more than those in ordinary school. Second, the elementary school teachers showed differences in the perception of TPACK, teacher efficacy, and school environment support according to the teacher's career, and leading school. Third, the elementary schools teachers perceived in TK, TCK, TPACK, educational support, and technology have a positive affect with techno-stress. The results are significant in that they provided data for reducing techno-stress of elementary school teachers in a flipped learning environment.

본 연구는 플립드러닝 환경에서 초등 교사가 지각하는 테크노스트레스와 관련 변인 간 관계를 살펴보는 데 목적이 있다. 연구 목적 달성을 위한 연구 문제는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 초등 교사가 지각하는 테크노스트레스의 차이는 어떠한가? 둘째, 초등 교사가 지각하는 테크노스트레스 관련 변인의 차이는 어떠한가? 셋째, 초등 교사가 지각하는 TPACK의 정도와 교사효능감, 학교 환경 지원은 테크노스트레스에 어떠한 영향을 주는가? 본 연구를 위하여 플립드러닝 수업을 운영한 경험이 있는 초등 교사 207명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 테크노스트레스, TPACK, 교사효능감, 학교 환경 지원으로 구성된 연구도구를 활용하였으며, 독립표본 t 검정, ANOVA, 중다회귀분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선도학교에서 근무하는 교사가 지각하는 테크노과부하, 테크노복잡성은 높다. 둘째, 교사의 경력, 선도학교 근무 여부에 따라 TPACK, 교사효능감, 학교 환경 지원의 지각 정도에 차이가 있다. 셋째, TK, TCK, TPACK 그리고 교사효능감의 교육 지원과 학교 환경 지원의 테크놀로지 어포던스는 테크노스트레스와 정적인 관계가 있다. 본 연구의 결과는 플립드러닝 환경에서 초등 교사의 테크노스트레스 감소를 위한 기초 자료를 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1104-1110.
  2. Archambault, L., & Cripper, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
  3. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
  4. Brod, C. (1982). Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel Journal, 61(1), 753-757.
  5. Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use of technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50(1), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.002
  6. Chae, K., & Kim, T. (2017). The effect of a STEAM-based elementary mobile algorithm class for flipped learning on students’ problem solving ability. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.4.463
  7. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Eom, W. (2014). What is a flipped classroom? Journal of Seoul Science Education, 12, 28-31.
  9. Eom, W., Lee, H., & Lee, S. (2017). Analysis on the intention of acceptance and practical use in flipped learning by elementary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 23(3), 549-578.
  10. Ertmet, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
  11. Fives, H. (2003). Exploring the relationships of teachers' efficacy, knowledge and pedagogical beliefs: A multimethod study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, MD.
  12. Go, J. (2006). The development of evaluation criteria for career services in universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
  13. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003627
  14. Hsu, S., & Kuan, P. Y. (2013). The impact of multilevel factors on technology integration: The case of Taiwanese grade 1-9 teachers and schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9269-y
  15. Huang, Y. (1999). Teacher efficacy and factors associated with teacher efficacy of secondary occupational foodservice teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, OH.
  16. Jeong, Y., & Seo, J. (2015). Development of the flipped classroom teaching and learning model for the smart classroom. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.175
  17. Joo, Y., Lim, K., & Kim, H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004
  18. Kwak, Y., Lee, S., Kang, H., Shin, Y., & Lee, S. (2019). Qualitative inquiry of features of science education leading schools on students’ positive experiences about science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.3.317
  19. Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
  20. Kim, S., Lee, Y., Hong, J., Koo, D., & Park, J. (2019). Recognition of SW education of students, parents, and teachers in elementary, middle and high schools: Focused on the SW leading school. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 23(6), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.591
  21. Kiraz, E., & Odmir, D. (2006). The relationship between educational ideologies and technology acceptance in pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 152-165.
  22. Knezek, J., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & J. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp 321-332). New York: Springer.
  23. Ko, Y., & Shin, W. (2020). The importance of school for teachers’ technology integration. Journal of Educational Research Institute, 22(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.15564/jeju.2020.02.22.1.21
  24. Lam, S., Cheng, R., & Choy, H. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.003
  25. Lee, H., & Min, C. (2016). A study of Secondary English teachers' perceptions of the flipped classroom. Secondary English Education, 9(3), 99-122.
  26. Lee, S., & Eom, W. (2019). Development of learner evaluation instrument for an action learning based university class. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 69-105. https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.35.1.069
  27. Lee, S., Lee, H., & Eom, W. (2018). Design principle of learning spaces for learner-centered learning: Focus on affordance. In Proceeding of the 16th International Conference for Media in Education (pp. 83-88), Cheongju, Korea.
  28. Lim, B. (2012). Needs on digital textbook and its implications on the policy making. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 317-346. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.2.317
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  30. Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Compute Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
  31. Park, T., & Cha, H. (2015). Investigation of teachers’ awareness of flipped classroom of explore its educational feasibility. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2015.18.1.008
  32. Shin, W. (2011). Factors influencing elementary school teachers' ICT instruction. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 17(2), 239-260.
  33. Shin, W. (2015). Teachers' use of technology and its influencing factors in Korean elementary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.915229
  34. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4-14.
  35. Son, E.., Park, J., Im, I., Lim, Y., & Hong, S. (2015). Impact of flipped learning applied at a class on learning motivation of collage students. The Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 6(2), 97-117.
  36. Song, Y. (2012). A grounded theory approach on teachers' digital textbook experience: overcoming the crisis of innovation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chungbuk National University, Chungbuk.
  37. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress in role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  38. Tondeur, J., Braak, J, Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  39. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  40. Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (2007). A conversation with technostress authors. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://www.scribd.com/doc/138410041/A-Conversation-With-TechnoStress-Authors