Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing College Students' Perception of Quality Computer Class

좋은 컴퓨터 수업에 대한 대학생들의 인식 유형 분석

  • Kim, Dugyu (Busan Gwangil Elementary School) ;
  • Lee, Jaemu (Busan National University of Education)
  • Received : 2020.04.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.15
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to clarify how college students think about quality computer classes. Q methodology is applied to extract the subjective thinking of college students. After extracting the statements through students' interviews and advanced study, the 54 Q samples were selected. The P sample consisted of 50 college students. They performed Q sort against the Q sample questionnaire. The Q sort results were analyzed by performing QUANL program. As a result of the analysis, four types of perceptions of quality computer classes based on college students' ideas were extracted. There were no differences between male and female students, but there was a clear difference between general college and teacher's college students by type. The types were divided into four categories which we named as follows: is 'Value change-oriented class through creative problem-solving', is 'Improving computer application skills through the learner's competition', is 'Improving advanced computer technology with programming skills' and is 'Learner centered pleasant class'.

본 연구는 대학생들이 좋은 컴퓨터 수업에 대하여 어떻게 생각하고 있는지를 밝히기 위함이다. 대학생들의 좋은 컴퓨터 수업에 대한 인식 유형을 분류하고 유형별 특징을 분석하였다. 대학생들의 주관적 생각을 추출하기 위하여 Q 방법론을 이용하였다. 먼저 면담과 선행 연구 분석을 통하여 진술문을 추출한 후 54개의 Q 표본을 선정하였다. 대학생 50명을 남녀 동수로 나누어 P 표본을 구성하고 Q 분류를 하게 하였다. Q 분류는 QUANL 프로그램을 수행하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 대학생들이 인식하는 좋은 컴퓨터 수업에 대한 유형은 네 가지로 추출되었다. 그리고 유형별 남녀 간의 차이는 없었으나, 일반대학과 교육대학 학생들은 유형의 차이가 확실히 나타났다. 좋은 컴퓨터 수업에 대하여 <유형 1>은 '창의적 문제해결을 통한 가치관 변화 지향 수업'이며, <유형 2>는 '학습자간 경쟁을 통한 컴퓨터 활용 능력 향상 수업'이고, <유형 3>은 '프로그래밍 능력과 함께 최신 컴퓨터 기술 습득 수업'이고, 그리고 <유형 4>는 '학습자 중심의 즐거운 수업'으로 인식하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sanghoon Im and Yeong-Mahn You (2018). A Critical Discourse Analysis on the ‘Quality College Classes’. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 1079-1112. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.34.4.1079
  2. Mija Oh (2019). Analysis of Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of “Good Lecture Component Factors” at College and Educational Needs. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 27(1), 1-22.
  3. Bongwoo Lee (2016). Secondary Science Teachers' Concepts of Good Science Teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0103
  4. DaeHyung Lee (2012). Searching for the Ability and Role of a Teacher for the Excellent Physical Education Class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(4), 281-307.
  5. JeongSuk Pang (2012). Prospective Elementary School Teachers' Conception on Good Mathematics Instruction. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education, 51(2), 145-160.
  6. William Stephenson (1967). The Play Theory of Mass Communication. The University of Chicago
  7. William Stephenson (1953). The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology. The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Linda J. Collins and Xin Liang (2014). In the Design of Online Professional Development for Teachers of ELLs: A Q Methodology Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 268-282.
  9. YongJae Lee and Jaemu Lee (2019). A Study on the Brand Attitude Types of College Students. A Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea, 17(4), 175-184.
  10. Bruce McKeown and Dan B. Thomas (2013). Q Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  11. Jaemu Lee and TaeChul Jung (2017). The Type Classification for Elementary School Teacher’s Role of Pre-service Teachers at Department of Computer Education. Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems, 12(6), 857-867. https://doi.org/10.34163/jkits.2017.12.6.007
  12. HeungKyu Kim (2008). Q Methodology: Philosophy, Theories, Analysis, and Application. Communication Books.
  13. Simon Watts and Paul Stenner (2012). Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  14. TaYoon, Cho (2019). A Examination on the Curriculum in ‘Allgemeine Padagogik’ in Herbart. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 13(1), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.35304/JCI.13.1.06
  15. Daeho Park(2019). The Significance of Herbart’s Concept of Taste for Moral Education. Journal of Korean Elementary Moral Education, 65, 313-338.