DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Towards Sustainable Agriculture in Korea : Theoretical Backgrounds and Practical Challenges

지속가능한 농업으로의 전환: 실천을 위한 이론과 과제

  • Received : 2019.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.14
  • Published : 2020.02.29

Abstract

This study argues that expanding the multifunctionality of agriculture (MFA) may mitigate existing agricultural problems. To do that this study redefines the concept and scope of the MFA and presents practical tasks to achieve it. Theorizing the MFA begins with the theory of sustainability and first identifies the link between sustainability and MFA. Later, considering the limitations of the existing sustainability theories, we examined where the false linkages leading to the destruction of environmental and social relations originated, and employed the (Re)productivity [(Re)produktivitat] theory in order to obtain alternatives. Research shows that welfare effects of the MFA on humans and the environment are not less than those derived from the agricultural products supplied to the real market, but the values are not recognized. The absence of proper care and compensation is the basis of agricultural problems in Korea. Therefore, this study acknowledges that the MFA is as much worthy as real agricultural production, and insists that appropriate compensation and care should be given to humans (farmers) and nature (agricultural ecosystem) in order to maintain and expand the MFA. In other words, a virtuous cycle between sustainability and the MFA means that the process spreads sustainable farming methods to expand the MFA, forms social consensus on it, and pays fair remuneration for agriculture from the public sector. Transition to such a virtuous cycle requires re-establishing the definition and scope of the MFA, implementing targeting policy, motivating policy targets, strengthening human capacity, and arranging maturity time.

Keywords

References

  1. Belletti, G., G. Brunori, A. Marescotti and A. Rossi. 2003. Individual and Collective Levels in Multifunctional Agriculture. In: Les Systemes Agroalimentaires Localises: Produits, Entreprises et Dynamiques Locales, Montpellier, France, 16-18 Octobre 2002: 1-22.
  2. Bennett, N. J., T. S. Whitty, E. Finkbeiner, J. Pittman, H. Bassett, S. Gelcich, and E. H. Allison. 2018. Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environmental Management. 61(4): 597-614.
  3. Biesecker, A. 2010. Eine Zukunftsfahige Okonomie ist Moglich - Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften.
  4. Biesecker, A., M. Mathes, S. Schon and B. Scurrell. 2000. Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften: Auf dem Weg zu Einer Okonomie des Guten Lebens. Bielefeld.
  5. Biesecker, A. and S. Hofmeister. 2006. Die Neuerfindung des Okonomischen. Munchen.
  6. Biesecker, A. and S. Hofmeister. 2010. Focus: (Re)productivity. Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders. Ecological Economics. 69(8): 1703-1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025
  7. Biesecker, A. and S. Hofmeister. 2015. (Re)Produktivitat als ein Sozial -okologisches 'Brückenkonzept'. Nachhaltigkeit Anders Denken. pp. 77-91. Munchen.
  8. Bromley, D. W. and I. Hodge. 1990. Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements: Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy. European Review of agricultural economics. 17(2): 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/17.2.197
  9. Cahill, C. 2001. The Multifunctionality of Agriculture: What Does It Mean? Euro Choices. 1(1): 36-41.
  10. Gasson, R. and C. Potter. 1988. Conservation through Land Diversion: A Survey of Farmers’ Attitudes. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 39(3): 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00593.x
  11. Garzon, I. 2005. Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the European Union: Is There Substance Behind the Discourse's Smoke?. Institute of Governmental Studies. UC Berkeley.
  12. Giovannucci, D., S. J. Scherr, D. Nierenberg, C. Hebebrand, J. Shapiro, J. Milder, and K. Wheeler. 2012. Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  13. Habermas, J. 1990. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere [Strukturwandel der Offentlichkeit]. Frankfurt a. M.
  14. Hall, C., A. McVittie, and D. Moran. 2004. What Does the Public Want From Agriculture and the Countryside? A Review of Evidence and Methods. Journal of Rural Studies. 20(2): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.08.004
  15. Heide, H. 1993. Nation as a Strategic Variable of the Capital. Theory Quarterly. 6.
  16. Heo, J. H., M. K. Lee, C. H. Rhew, and S. H. Woo. 2018. Analysis of Influential Factors for Sustainable Agricultural Development. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy. 45(4): 721-741.
  17. Howley, P., L. Yadav, S. Hynes, C. O. Donoughue, and S. O. Neil. 2014. Contrasting the Attitudes of Farmers and the General Public Regarding the ‘Multifunctional’ Role of the Agricultural Sector. Land Use Policy. 38: 248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.020
  18. Hwang, S .C. 2014. How Has Agricultural Paradigm Been Evolved? Agricultural Policy Quarterly, 51: 189-217.
  19. Hwang, S. C. 2018. How to Change the Agriculture Development Strategy? A Paper presented at FARP 25th Anniversary Symposium.
  20. Jeong, H. S. 2007. Desirable Direction of Social Investment Policy. A paper presented at Korean Academy of Social Welfare Annual Conference (Summer): 143-166.
  21. Jung, J. K. 2002a. A Time Lag Approach to Public Administration and Public Policy. Korean Public Administration Review. 36(1): 1-19.
  22. Jung, J. K. 2002b. Change Process of Policy and Institution, and Dynamic Aspect of Causal Law. The Korea Association for Policy Studies. 11(2): 255-272.
  23. Kim, H. S. and S. W. Hwang. 2009. Time Lag Approach of Korean Agricultural Policy: On the Emphasis of Farm Income Support(Compensation) Policy and Agricultural Restructuring Policy. Korean Public Administration Quarterly. 21(1): 169-201.
  24. Kim, J. T. 2018. Content and Evaluation of Agricultural and Rural Studies in Comparison with Social Cognition: Focusing on Text Mining Analysis. Journal of Rural Society. 28(1): 65-103.
  25. Kim, S. S. 2018. A Study on Sustainable Agriculture Paradigm: Centering on Agricultural Policy System in Switzerland. KREI.
  26. Kim, S. S., J. H. Sung, W. J. Cho, M. K. Lee, and S. M. Lee. 2018. The Evaluation of Agricultural Multifunctionality-Focused on Sustainable Livestock Production. KREI.
  27. Kim, S. S., H. S. Han, and J. H. Heo. 2015. A Study on the Social Conflict Management in the Agricultural and Rural Sector: Current Situation and Policy Implications. KREI.
  28. Kim, T. Y. 2015. Multifunctionality in Korean agriculture: Somewhat Uncomfortable Truth. GSnJ Institute.
  29. Kim, T. Y. 2016. Necessity of Korean Agricultural Policy Reform: Direction and Suggestion. 2016 GSnJ Symposium (2016.11.1.).
  30. Kim, Y. R., H. K. Jeong, and J. H. Min. 2013. Measuring Willingness to Pay of the Public on Multifunctionality. KREI.
  31. Kong, K. S., C. Y. Lee, and M. H. Lee. 2013. Evaluating Multifunctionality of Rice-farming as Regards Climate Change. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management. 40(2): 352-380.
  32. KRCC (Korea Rural Community Corporate). 2016. 2016 Agricultural Water Quality Research Report.
  33. Lee, J. H., G. W. Seol, M. H. Lee, M. H. Kim, H. H. Kim, J. K. Seo, B. I. Ahn, J. B. Im, S. J. Lee, Y. D. Cho, and J. E. Pyun. 2012. Vision of Korean Agriculture: Way for Rationalizing Agricultural Policy. Ministry of Economy and Finance.
  34. Lee, H. L., Y. S. Park, and O. S. Kwon. 2015. Estimating Rural Amenity Values in Korea: a Benefit Transfer Approach. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics. 56(3): 1-26.
  35. Lee, M. K., C. H. Rhew, J. H. Heo, and S. H. Woo. 2017. Innovation, Productivity, and Sustainability in Korean Agri-food Sector: Application of OECD Framework. KREI.
  36. Lee, M. H. 2017. From Subordinaries' Agriculture to Citizens' Agriculture. Agricultural Policy Quarterly. 64: 24-27.
  37. Lee, T. H., J. B. Im, D. H. Ahn, M. C. Seo, K. H. Kim, B. K. Cha, and T. I. Kim. 2011. Mid-term Review of Recent Agricultural Policy. MAFRA.
  38. Lynne, G. 1995. Modifying the Neo-classical Approach to Technology Adoption with Behavioural Science Models. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 27(1): 67-80.
  39. Miceli, V. 2005. EU Agricultural Policy: the Concept of Multifunctionality and Value Added Agriculture. CRANEC.
  40. Morris, J., J. Mills, and I. M. Crawford. 2000. Promoting Farmer Uptake of Agri-environment Schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme. Land Use Policy. 17: 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00021-1
  41. Wirtschaften, N. V. 2013. Wege Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften. Marburg.
  42. OECD. 2001. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  43. OECD. 2015a. Public Goods and Externalities: Agri-environmental Policy Measures in Selected OECD Countries. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  44. OECD. 2015b. Analysing Policies to Improve Agricultural Productivity Growth, Sustainability. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  45. Oh, N. W. 2017. Challenges for Enlarging and Reforming of Direct Payment Cchemes. KREI.
  46. Oh, S. I., S. S. Kim, and C. Y. Kang, 2001. An Evaluation of Multifunctionality in Agriculture. KREI.
  47. Park, S. J., T. G. Kim, H. G. Jeong, Y. S. Cho and Y. W. Cho. 2007. An Approach to Advanced Agricultural Policy Toward the Open Economy. KREI.
  48. Pretty, J. 2008. Agricultural Sustainability: Concepts, Principles and Evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 363: 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
  49. Pretty, J., C. Brett, D. Gee, R. Hine, C. Mason, J. Morison, M. Rayment, G. van der Bijl, and T. Dobbs. 2001. Policy Challenges and Priorities for Internalizing the Externalities of Modern Agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 44(2): 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560123782
  50. RDA. 2001. Evaluation Method on Multifunctionality in Agriculture. Rural Development Agency.
  51. Rhew, C. H., C. H. Kim, and Y. J. Kim. 2019. Farm Economy Status and Transition Trajectories in Korea: Implications and Challenges. A paper presented at KAEA Annual Conference (Summer), Jul. 8-9, 2-19, Jeju, Korea,
  52. Rhew, C. H.. H. S. Seo, and T. H. Kim. 2019. Farm Economy Status during 2013-2017: Challenges and Implications. KREI.
  53. Rhew, C. H., J. K. Park, J. I. Kim, and J. Y. Park. 2016. A Study on Enhancing the Direct Payment Schemes Based on Multi-faceted Evaluation. KREI.
  54. Rhew, C. H. and T. H. Kim. 2018. Income Inequality Across Farms in Korea: Implications and Challenges. Research Brief. R No. 9. NRC.
  55. Rhew, C. H., W. J. Cho, and S. W. Kim. 2018a. The policy Agenda and Direction for Enhancing Multifunctionality in Agriculture. KREI.
  56. Rhew, C. H., Y. K. Sim and K. R. Lee. 2018b. The Policy Agenda and Direction for Enhancing Multifunctionality in Agriculture: Supplementary Note. KREI.
  57. Rhew, C. H., H. S. Hong, and T. H. Kim. 2019. Farm Economy 2013-2017: Status and Implication. Agricultural Policy Focus, No. 179. KREI.
  58. SAI PLATFORM. Available from https://saiplatform.org/our-commitment [cited 27 August 2019]
  59. Shin, Y. K., Y. Kim, and S. Y. Lee. 2004. An Economic Evaluation of Multi-Functionality of Rural Areas and Benefit Transfer. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning. 10(1): 1-7.
  60. Sydorovych, O. and A. Wossink. 2008. The Meaning of Agricultural Sustainability: Evidence from a Conjoint Choice Survey. Agricultural Systems. 98(1): 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.001
  61. Varian, H. R. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. W. W. Norton & Company. New York.
  62. Von Wiren-Lehr, S. 2001. Sustainability in Agriculture - An Evaluation of Principal Goaloriented Concepts to Close the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 84(2): 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00197-3
  63. Yoo, J. C. 1999. The Measurement of Integrated Value of Agriculture as Market and Nonmarket Services: Contingent Valuation Method. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management. 26(1): 3-12.
  64. Yoo, J. C., K. S. Kong, S. S. Yeo, and M. C. Seo. 2010. Estimating the Economic Value of Function for Public Benefits on Practice of Organic Farming - Using Choice Experiments. Korea Journal of Organic Agriculture. 18(3): 291-313.
  65. Yoo, Y. B., J. S. Ko, M. S. Baek, S. W. Kho, J. C. Lee, and C. H. Kim. 2016. Revealing Korean Agricultural Growth Path and the Analysis of Its Structural Change. Rural Development Agency.
  66. Yoon, B. S. 2010. A Study on the Development of Alternative Agricultural Movements in Korea. Journal of Rural Society. 20(1): 131-160.
  67. Yunlong, C. and B. Smit. 1994. Sustainability in Agriculture: A General Review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 49(3): 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(94)90059-0
  68. Zawojska, A. 2013. The Economic and Social Justifications for Public Spending to Agriculture: Theoretical insights and empirical observations. Oeconomia. 12(4): 133-143.