DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fracture Strength and Translucency of CAD/CAM Zirconia Crown for Primary Anterior Tooth

CAD/CAM으로 제작한 유전치 지르코니아 전장관의 두께에 따른 파절강도와 반투명도 비교

  • Ong, Seung-Hwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongsoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongbin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Jisun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoo, Seunghoon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 옹승환 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신지선 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 유승훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2019.12.19
  • Accepted : 2020.02.03
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of primary anterior zirconia crown made with Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology by analyzing fracture strength and translucency parameter. Zirconia crown was designed with CAD software, using 3D scanned data of #61 tooth model. Crown fabrication was performed with CAM machine using zirconia block. Zirconia crowns were divided into 3 groups according to thickness(0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mm), and fracture strength was compared with 1.0 mm thickness of resin strip crown. The compressive force was applied with universal testing machine at 30° along the incisal edge at increments of 1 mm/min. For translucency evaluation, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mm thickness of zirconia specimens were fabricated and translucency was measured with spectrophotometer. Among zirconia groups, there was a significant increase in fracture strength as thickness increased (p < 0.05). The fracture strength of zirconia crown was significantly higher than resin strip crown in all groups (p < 0.05). Translucency parameter was highest in 0.3 mm group, and significantly decreased as thickness increased to 0.5 and 0.7 mm (p < 0.05). Thin primary anterior zirconia crown can be designed and fabricated according to individual needs by using CAD/CAM. Restoration with thin crown would reduce the amount of tooth reduction, risk of pulp exposure, and make more esthetic restoration possible.

이 연구의 목적은 파절강도와 반투명도 측정을 통해 Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)으로 제작한 유전치 지르코니아 전장관의 임상적 적용 가능성을 확인하는 것이다. 기성 유전치 모형 중 #61을 스캔하여 얻은 3차원 형상 데이터로 CAD 디자인 프로그램을 이용하여 전장관을 디자인하고, 지르코니아 블록으로 CAM 밀링 기계를 이용하여 전장관을 제작하였다. 지르코니아 전장관은 두께에 따라 0.3, 0.5, 그리고 0.7 mm의 3군으로 나누어 1.0 mm 두께의 레진 전장관과 파절강도를 비교하였다. 파절강도는 만능시험기를 이용하여 30° 각도에서 1 mm/min 속도로 절단면에 하중을 가하여 측정하였다. 반투명도는 가로와 세로가 7.0 mm, 그리고 두께가 각각 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 mm 인 사각형 지르코니아 시편을 제작하여 분광측색장치로 측정하였다. 파절강도 측정 결과 지르코니아 전장관은 두께가 증가할수록 파절강도가 높아졌으며 모든 두께의 지르코니아 군에서 대조군인 레진 전장관보다 파절강도가 높았다(p < 0.05). 반투명도는 0.3 mm 군에서 가장 높았으며 0.5, 0.7 mm로 두께가 증가할수록 감소하였다(p < 0.05). CAD/CAM으로 제작한 지르코니아 전장관은 개별 치아에 맞추어 얇게 디자인 및 제작 가능하며, 얇은 전장관을 이용한 수복은 임상적으로 치아 삭제량과 치수노출 위험성 감소 뿐만 아니라, 더 심미적인 수복을 가능하게 해줄 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anil S, Anand PS : Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Front Pediatr, 5:157, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00157
  2. Waggoner WF : Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent, 24:511-516, 2002.
  3. O'Sullivan DM, Tinanoff N : Maxillary anterior caries associated with increased caries risk in other primary teeth. J Dent Res, 72:1577-1580, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720120801
  4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Restorative Dentistry Subcommittee : Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 34:173-180, 2012.
  5. Kim SY, Lim YJ, Jih MK, et al. : Comparison of crown shape and amount of tooth reduction for primary anterior prefabricated crowns. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 46:64-75, 2019.
  6. Hedge S, Panwar S, Bolar DR, Sanghavi MB : Characteristics of occlusion in primary dentition of preschool children of Udaipur, India. Eur J Dent, 6:51-55, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698930
  7. Machado E, Dal-Fabbro C, Cunali PA, Kaizer OB : Prevalence of sleep bruxism in children: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod, 19:54-61, 2014.
  8. Choi JW, Bae IH, Huh JB, et al. : Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns. J Adv Prosthodont, 8:43-52, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.43
  9. Zilich C : Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM restorations on anterior primary teeth. PhD Thesis, UCSF, 2015.
  10. Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J : Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 38:42-46, 2016.
  11. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG : The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am, 55:559-570, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
  12. Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Kobayashi T, et al. : Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res, 57:236-261, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001
  13. Planells del Pozo P, Fuks AB : Zirconia crowns-an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 38:193-195, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.38.3.0255q84jt2851311
  14. Edelweiss dentistry : Fact sheet - pediatric crown. Available from URL: https://www.edelweissdentistry.com/downloads (Accessed on December 10, 2019).
  15. Lee JM, Lee HS, Choi SC, et al. : Three dimensional analysis of primary maxillary central and lateral anterior zirconia crown. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:176-186, 2016.
  16. Arangannal P, Chandra B, Vijayaprabha, et al. : Enamel thickness in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 37:177-182, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.2.d6837416076l3334
  17. Seow WK, Young WG, Tsang AKL, Daley T : A study of primary dental enamel from preterm and full-term children using light and scanning electron microscopy. Pediatr Dent, 27:374-379, 2005.
  18. Fernandes NA, Vally ZI, Sykes LM : The longevity of restorations-a literature review. SADJ, 70:410-413, 2015.
  19. Waggoner WF : Fracture strength of four veneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 17:36-40, 1995.
  20. Mountain G, Wood D, Toumba J : Bite force measurement in children with primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent, 21:112-118, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01098.x
  21. Gaviao MBD, Raymundo VG, Rentes AM : Masticatory performance and bite force in children with primary dentition. Braz Oral Res, 21:146-152, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000200009
  22. Nordahl N, von Steyern PV, Larsson C : Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci, 57:255-261, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.255
  23. Al-Juaila E, Osman E, Farghaly EA, et al. : Comparison of translucency for different thicknesses of recent types of esthetic zirconia ceramics versus conventional ceramics (in vitro study). Future Dent J, 4:297-301, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.003
  24. Sagsoz NP, Yanikoglu N : Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses. Niger J Clin Pract, 21:417-422, 2018.
  25. Bayindir F, Koseoglu M : The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucent monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent, 123:149-154, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.002