DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars Using Different Pulp Capping Agents and Restoration Materials

치수복조재와 최종수복재에 따른 대구치 부분치수절단술의 비교

  • Lee, Jimi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jih, Myeongkwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 이지미 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상호 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 지명관 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2019.10.10
  • Accepted : 2019.11.18
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of two pulp capping materials, Biodentine™ and RetroMTA®, used for partial pulpotomy in permanent molars after carious exposures and to compare the final restorative outcome of using composite resin to that of using a stainless steel crown. We studied children who were diagnosed with dental caries of permanent molars and underwent partial pulpotomy. The patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Clinical and radiographic evaluation were used to evaluate the success of each treatment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the outcomes of two groups. For pulp capping agents, the success rate of using RetroMTA® was lower than that of using Biodentine™(p < 0.05). Final restoration with composite resin was less successful than restoration with an stainless steel crown(p < 0.05). In combination of pulp capping agents and final restoration material, RetroMTA®-composite resin shows the lowest success rate(p < 0.05).

이 연구의 목적은 우식에 의해 치수가 노출된 영구대구치에서 Biodentine™(BD)과 RetroMTA®(RMTA)의 치수복조재 및 stainless steel crown(SSC)와 composite resin(CR)의 최종수복재를 적용하여 치료한 부분치수절단술 증례들의 임상 및 방사선학적 비교 평가를 통해 각 치수복조재 및 최종수복재가 치료 결과에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 영구대구치의 상아질의 우식으로 진단되어 부분치수절단술을 받은 소아 및 청소년을 대상으로 경과관찰 기간이 1년 이상인 증례를 선정하여 임상적 평가 및 방사선학적 평가를 통해 치료의 성공률을 평가하였으며 각 성공률에 대해 Fisher's exact test로 통계 분석하였다. 치수복조재에 대한 평가에서 BD이 RMTA에 비해 더 높은 치료 성공률을 보였다(p < 0.05). 치수복조재의 종류와 관계없이 최종수복재를 평가하였을 때 SSC으로 수복했을 때 CR으로 수복한 경우에 비해 더 높은 성공률을 보였다(p < 0.05). 치수복조재로 RMTA를 사용하고 최종수복재로 CR을 사용한 경우에 가장 낮은 성공률을 보였다(p < 0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Fong CD, Davis MJ : Partial pulpotomy for immature permanent teeth, its present and future. Pediatr Dent, 24:29-32, 2002.
  2. American Academy Of Pediatric Dentistry : Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Available from URL: https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_pulptherapy.pdf (Accessed on November 1, 2019).
  3. Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M : A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endodontic J, 10:6-15, 2015.
  4. Guelmann M, McIlwain MF, Primosch RE : Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent, 27:24-27, 2005.
  5. Schuurs AH, Gruythuysen RJ, Wesselink PR : Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol, 16:240-250, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006240.x
  6. El-Meligy OA, Avery DR : Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in young permanent teeth (Apexogenesis). Pediatr Dent, 28:399-404, 2006.
  7. Saidon J, He J, Spangberg LS, et al. : Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 95:483-489, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.20
  8. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR : Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod, 21:349-353, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2
  9. Singh H, Kaur M, Markan S, Kapoor P : Biodentine: A promising dentin substitute. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci, 2:140, 2014.
  10. Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Verbeeck RM, et al. : $Biodentine^{TM}$ material characteristics and clinical applications: a 3 year literature review and update. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 19:1-22, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0328-x
  11. Kang CM, Sun Y, Shin Y, et al. : A randomized controlled trial of various MTA materials for partial pulpotomy in permanent teeth. J Dent, 60:8-13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.015
  12. Chung CJ, Kim E, Shin SJ, et al. : Effects of two fast-setting calcium-silicate cements on cell viability and angiogenic factor release in human pulp-derived cells. Odontology , 104:142-151, 2016.
  13. Mass E, Zilberman U : Long-term radiologic pulp evaluation after partial pulpotomy in young permanent molars. Quintessence Int, 42:547-554, 2011.
  14. Seale NS : The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 24:501-505, 2002.
  15. Hutcheson C, Seale NS, Wright J, et al. : Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent, 31:460-467, 2012.
  16. Zhang W, Yelick PC : Vital pulp therapy-current progress of dental pulp regeneration and revascularization. Int J Dent, 2010:856087, 2010.
  17. Bani M, Aktas N, Cinar C, Odabas ME : The clinical and radiographic success of primary molar pulpotomy using $Biodentine^{TM}$ and mineral trioxide aggregate: A 24-month randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Dent, 39:284-288, 2017.
  18. Kusum B, Rakesh K, Richa K : Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Restor Dent Endod, 40:276-285, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.276
  19. Kang CM, Kim SH, Song JS, et al. : A randomized controlled trial of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA and RetroMTA for pulpotomy in primary molars. Oral Dis, 21:785-791, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12348
  20. Gruythuysen RJ, Weerheijm KL : Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two years. ASDC J Dent Child, 64:251-253, 1997.
  21. Ajami AA, Jafari Navimipour E, Daneshpooy M, et al. : Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 7:164-168, 2013.
  22. Sinkar RC, Patil SS, Jogad NP, Gade VJ : Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, Retro MTA, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials: An unltraviolet spectrophotometric analysis. J Conserv Dent, 18:445-448, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.168803
  23. Lertmalapong P, Jantarat J, Srisatjaluk RL, Komoltri C : Bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of various bioceramics as apical plug in open apex model. J Investig Clin Dent, 10:e12371, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12371
  24. Lin PY, Chen HS, Wang YH, Tu YK : Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent, 42:1060-1077, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.001
  25. Kunert GG, Kunert IR, da Costa Filho LC, de Figueiredo JAP : Permanent teeth pulpotomy survival analysis: retrospective follow-up. J Dent, 43:1125-1131, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.010
  26. Jih MK, Lee SH, Lee NY : Retrospective study of survival rates according to the type of dental restoration of proximal caries in primary molars, J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 42:249-256, 2015.
  27. Jung YS, Shin JS : 5 year cumulative survival rate of composite resin restorations in permanent first molars. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 46:310-317, 2019.
  28. Jontarat J, Ritsayam S, Banomyong D, Chaimanakarn C : Early and 24-hour shear bond strength to dentine of three calcium silicate based pulp capping materials. M Dent J, 38:177-183, 2018.
  29. Cantenkin K, Avci S : Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement ($Biodentine^{(R)}$). J Appl Oral Sci, 22:302-306, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130660
  30. Velagala L Deepa, Bhargavi Dhamaraju, Indira Priyadharsini Bollu, Tandri S Balaji : Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 19:166-170, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.178696
  31. Kerby RE, Knobloch L : The relative shear bond strength of visible light-curing and chemically curing glass-ionomer cement to composite resin. Quintessence Int, 23:641-644, 1992.
  32. Yesilyurt C, Yildirim T, Tasdemir T, Kusgoz A : Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod, 35:1381-1383, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.003
  33. Aguilar P, Linsuwanont P : Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: a systematic review. J Endod, 37:581-587, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.004
  34. Accorinte M, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Holland R : Effects of hemostatic agents on the histomorphologic response of human dental pulp capped with calcium hydroxide. Quintessence Int, 38:843-852, 2007.
  35. Cox CF, Hafez AA : Biocomposition and reaction of pulp tissues to restorative treatments. Dent Clin North Am, 45:31-48, 2001.
  36. Ozgur B, Uysal S, Gungor HC : Partial pulpotomy in immature permanent molars after carious exposures using different hemorrhage control and capping materials. Pediatr Dent, 39:364-370, 2017.
  37. Hashem DF, Foxton R, Banerjee A, et al. : The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater, 30:343-349, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.010
  38. Malkondu O, Karapinar Kazandag M, Kazazoglu E : A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int, 2014:160951, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/160951
  39. Song YH, Lee NY, Lee SH, Jih MK : Microleakage and shear bond strength of biodentine at different setting time. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:344-353, 2018.