DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Short- to mid-term outcomes of radial head replacement for complex radial head fractures

  • Baek, Chung-Sin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Beom-Soo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Du-Han (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Chul-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.11.10
  • Accepted : 2020.11.24
  • Published : 2020.12.01

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the current study was to investigate short- to mid-term outcomes and complications following radial head replacement (RHR) for complex radial head fractures and to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes. Methods: Twenty-four patients with complex radial head fractures were treated by RHR. The mean age of the patients was 49.8 years (range, 19-73 years). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated for a mean follow-up period of 58.9 months (range, 27-163 months) using the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (Quick-DASH) score, and serial plain radiographs. Complications were also evaluated. Results: At the final follow-up, the mean VAS score, MEPS, and Quick-DASH score were 0.6±1.1, 88.7±11.5, and 19.4±7.8, respectively. The mean range of motion was 132.7° of flexion, 4.7° of extension, 76.2° of pronation, and 77.5° of supination. Periprosthetic lucency was observed in six patients (25%). Heterotopic ossification was observed in four patients (16.7%). Arthritic change of the elbow joint developed in seven patients (29.2%). Capitellar wear was found in five patients (20.8%). Arthritic change of the elbow joint was significantly correlated with MEPS (P=0.047). Four cases of complications (16.6%) were observed, including two cases of major complications (one stiffness with heterotopic ossification and progressive ulnar neuropathy and one stiffness) and two cases of minor complications (two transient ulnar neuropathy). Conclusions: RHR for the treatment of complex radial head fractures yielded satisfactory short- to mid-term clinical outcomes, though radiographic complications were relatively high.

Keywords

References

  1. Ha AS, Petscavage JM, Chew FS. Radial head arthroplasty: a radiologic outcome study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1078-82. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7674
  2. Lott A, Broder K, Goch A, Konda SR, Egol KA. Results after radial head arthroplasty in unstable fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:270-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.011
  3. Ahmed I, Mistry J. The management of acute and chronic elbow instability. Orthop Clin North Am 2015;46:271-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2014.11.008
  4. Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of treatment of fracture: dislocations of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;(216):109-19.
  5. Koslowsky TC, Mader K, Gausepohl T, Pennig D. Reconstruction of Mason type-III and type-IV radial head fractures with a new fixation device: 23 patients followed 1-4 years. Acta Orthop 2007;78:151-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013565
  6. Wang TM, Leu LJ, Wang J, Lin LD. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:231-7.
  7. Ruan HJ, Fan CY, Liu JJ, Zeng BF. A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III. Int Orthop 2009;33:249-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0453-3
  8. Chen X, Wang SC, Cao LH, Yang GQ, Li M, Su JC. Comparison between radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation in clinical treatment of unstable, multi-fragmented radial head fractures. Int Orthop 2011;35:1071-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1107-4
  9. Li N, Chen S. Open reduction and internal-fixation versus radial head replacement in treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:851-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1367-y
  10. Ring D, Quintero J, Jupiter JB. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1811-5. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200210000-00011
  11. Dou Q, Yin Z, Sun L, Feng X. Prosthesis replacement in Mason III radial head fractures: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:729-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.015
  12. Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Rocchi M, Capra F, Catani F. Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: is this a safe treatment option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103:183-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017
  13. Sershon RA, Luchetti TJ, Cohen MS, Wysocki RW. Radial head replacement with a bipolar system: an average 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:e38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.015
  14. Van Riet RP, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF. Failure of metal radial head replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:661-7.
  15. Duckworth AD, Wickramasinghe NR, Clement ND, CourtBrown CM, McQueen MM. Radial head replacement for acute complex fractures: what are the rate and risks factors for revision or removal. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2136-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3516-y
  16. Laumonerie P, Reina N, Ancelin D, et al. Mid-term outcomes of 77 modular radial head prostheses. Bone Joint J 2017;99:1197-203. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1043.R2
  17. Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, King GJ. Comminuted radial head fractures treated with a modular metallic radial head arthroplasty: study of outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2192-200.
  18. Hastings H 2nd, Graham TJ. The classification and treatment of heterotopic ossification about the elbow and forearm. Hand Clin 1994;10:417-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0712(21)01180-X
  19. Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:669-74. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668050-00005
  20. Lamas C, Castellanos J, Proubasta I, Dominguez E. Comminuted radial head fractures treated with pyrocarbon prosthetic replacement. Hand (N Y) 2011;6:27-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-010-9282-8
  21. Ring D. Displaced, unstable fractures of the radial head: fixation vs. replacement: what is the evidence. Injury 2008;39:1329-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.011
  22. Laumonerie P, Ancelin D, Reina N, et al. Causes for early and late surgical re-intervention after radial head arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2017;41:1435-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3496-0
  23. Schnetzke M, Aytac S, Deuss M, et al. Radial head prosthesis in complex elbow dislocations: effect of oversizing and comparison with ORIF. Int Orthop 2014;38:2295-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2478-8
  24. Al-Burdeni S, Abuodeh Y, Ibrahim T, Ahmed G. Open reduction and internal fixation versus radial head arthroplasty in the treatment of adult closed comminuted radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV). Int Orthop 2015;39:1659-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2755-1
  25. Fehringer EV, Burns EM, Knierim A, Sun J, Apker KA, Berg RE. Radiolucencies surrounding a smooth-stemmed radial head component may not correlate with forearm pain or poor elbow function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:275-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.012
  26. Chen AC, Chou YC, Weng CJ, Cheng CY. Long-term outcomes of modular metal prosthesis replacement in patients with irreparable radial head fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0844-8
  27. Agyeman KD, Damodar D, Watkins I, Dodds SD. Does radial head implant fixation affect functional outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:126-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.032