DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Peri-anchor cyst formation after arthroscopic bankart repair: comparison between biocomposite suture anchor and all-suture anchor

  • Jin, Seokhwan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chun, Yong-Min (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.07
  • 심사 : 2020.10.31
  • 발행 : 2020.12.01

초록

Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and radiological findings of cyst formation in the glenoid around suture anchors after arthroscopic Bankart repair with either biocomposite suture anchor or all-suture anchor in traumatic anterior shoulder instability. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two suture materials. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 162 patients (69 in group A, biocomposite anchor; 93 in group B, all-suture anchor) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with less than 20% glenoid defect on preoperative en-face view three-dimensional computed tomography. Patient assignment was not randomized. Results: At final follow-up, the mean subjective shoulder value, Rowe score, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score improved significantly in both groups. However, there were no significant differences in functional shoulder scores and recurrence rate (6%, 4/69 in group A; 5%, 5/93 in group B) between the two groups. On follow-up magnetic resonance arthrography/computed tomography arthrography, the incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation was 5.7% (4/69) in group A and 3.2% (3/93) in group B, which was not a significant difference. Conclusions: Considering the low incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation in the glenoid after Bankart repair with one of two anchor systems and the lack of association with recurrence instability, biocomposite and all-suture anchors in Bankart repair yield satisfactory outcomes with no significant difference.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hovelius L, Eriksson K, Fredin H, et al. Recurrences after initial dislocation of the shoulder: results of a prospective study of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:343-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365030-00008
  2. Hovelius L, Olofsson A, Sandstrom B, et al. Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger: a prospective twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:945-52. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00070
  3. Taylor DC, Arciero RA. Pathologic changes associated with shoulder dislocations: arthroscopic and physical examination findings in first-time, traumatic anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:306-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500306
  4. Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1755-63. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00817
  5. Aboalata M, Plath JE, Seppel G, Juretzko J, Vogt S, Imhoff AB. Results of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior-inferior shoulder instability at 13-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:782-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516675145
  6. Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. The evolution of suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2013;29:1589-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.011
  7. Goeminne S, Debeer P. Delayed migration of a metal suture anchor into the glenohumeral joint. Acta Orthop Belg 2010;76:834-7.
  8. Grutter PW, McFarland EG, Zikria BA, Dai Z, Petersen SA. Techniques for suture anchor removal in shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:1706-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510372794
  9. Jeong JH, Shin SJ. Arthroscopic removal of proud metallic suture anchors after Bankart repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:1109-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0847-3
  10. Kim SH, Oh JH, Lee OS, Lee HR, Hargens AR. Postoperative imaging of bioabsorbable anchors in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:552-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513517538
  11. Milewski MD, Diduch DR, Hart JM, Tompkins M, Ma SY, Gaskin CM. Bone replacement of fast-absorbing biocomposite anchors in arthroscopic shoulder labral repairs. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1392-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512441589
  12. Randelli P, Cucchi D, Ragone V, de Girolamo L, Cabitza P, Randelli M. History of rotator cuff surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23:344-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3445-z
  13. Pfeiffer FM, Smith MJ, Cook JL, Kuroki K. The histologic and biomechanical response of two commercially available small glenoid anchors for use in labral repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1156-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.036
  14. Dhawan A, Ghodadra N, Karas V, Salata MJ, Cole BJ. Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1424-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511417573
  15. Tompane T, Carney J, Wu WW, et al. Glenoid bone reaction to all-soft suture anchors used for shoulder labral repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018;100:1223-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01169
  16. Lee JH, Park I, Hyun HS, Kim SW, Shin SJ. Comparison of clinical outcomes and computed tomography analysis for tunnel diameter after arthroscopic Bankart repair with the all-suture anchor and the biodegradable suture anchor. Arthroscopy 2019;35:1351-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.011
  17. Van der Bracht H, Van den Langenbergh T, Pouillon M, Verhasselt S, Verniers P, Stoffelen D. Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: a midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:2006-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.006
  18. Barber FA, Herbert MA. Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update. Arthroscopy 2013;29:832-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028
  19. Mazzocca AD, Chowaniec D, Cote MP, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair. Arthroscopy 2012;28:642-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.024
  20. Nakagawa S, Hirose T, Tachibana Y, Iuchi R, Mae T. Postoperative recurrence of instability due to new anterior glenoid rim fractures after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:2840-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517714476
  21. Park JY, Lee SJ, Oh SK, Oh K, Noh Y, Suh KT. Glenoid rim fracture through anchor points after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability. Int Orthop 2015;39:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2604-7