DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth, Body shape and Carcass cutting yield traits of Duroc and Crossbred(Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain)pigs

두록과 교잡돈(두록×피어트레인×피어트레인)의 성장, 체형형질 및 도체 부분육 생산량 비교

  • Kim, Young Sin (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, JeongA (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeong, Yong Dae (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Yo Han (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Cho, Eun Seok (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Chung, Hak Jae (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sa, Soo Jin (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Beak, Sun Young (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hong, Joon Ki (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김영신 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 김정아 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 정용대 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 최요한 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 조은석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 정학재 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 사수진 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 백선영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 홍준기 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과)
  • Received : 2020.05.26
  • Accepted : 2020.07.03
  • Published : 2020.07.31

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the growth, body shape and carcass cutting yield traits of Duroc (D) and crossbred (Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain; DPP) pigs. A total of 147 D and 101 DPP pigs were used for analyzing the growth trait, whereas 16 D and 16 DPP pigs were evaluated for carcass yields. Backfat thickness (BF) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly higher in D (14.07±0.24 mm, 2,101 g) than in DPP (12.69±3.25 mm, 1,909 g) (p <0.001). Moreover, D exhibited significantly higher body shape traits including body height (BH), chest depth (CD) and chest width (CW), as compared to DPP pigs (p <0.001). No differences were observed for body length (BL) between the two strains. Analysis of the carcass cutting yield traits determined for D and DPP were in the order: ham (HM; 31.17% and 33.43%), belly (BY; 23.40% and 19.55%), and picnic shoulder (PS; 16.54% and 16.87%), respectively. Then, HM showed a difference of 2.26% P with D(31.17%) and DPP(33.43%), while BY showed a difference of 3.85% P with D(23.40%) and DPP(19.55%). Taken together, our results indicate that DPP has a better feed efficiency than D, and therefore has the potential to increase the production of low-fat pork, targeting consumers having a high preference who have opted for a healthy lifestyle. These results can be used as basic data for developing an ideal pig breed.

본 실험은 국내와 유럽에서 비육돈 생산 시 종료웅돈으로 이용되는 품종과 이를 활용한 교잡돈의 성장, 체형형질 및 도체 부분육 생산량을 알아보기 위해 수행하였다. 본 실험을 위해 산육형질 분석은 D(Duroc) 147두, DPP(Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain) 101두, 도체 부분육 생산량 분석은 D, DPP 각각 16두를 사용하였다. 실험결과 등지방두께는 DPP는 12.69±3.25 mm, D는 14.07±0.24 mm로 높은 유의적 차이를 보였고, 일일사료섭취량은 DPP는 1,909 g, D는 2,101 g으로 조사되었다(p<0.001). 체고, 흉심, 흉폭은 D가 DPP에 비해 높은 유의적 차이를 보였지만(p<0.001), 체장은 비슷하게 조사되었다. D의 도체 부분육 생산량 비중은 후지, 삽겹살, 전지 순서였고, 각각 31.17, 23.40 및 16.54%를 차지하였으며, DPP의 도체 부분육 생산량 비중은 각각 33.43, 19.55 및 16.87%를 차지하였다. 부위별 도체 부분육 생산량 비율 차이를 살펴보면, 후지는 DPP 33.43%, D 31.17%로 2.26% P 차이를 보인 반면, 삼겹살은 D 23.40%, DPP 19.55% 로 3.85% P 차이를 보였다. 따라서 DPP는 D 보다 사료효율이 우수하고, 최근 건강을 생각하는 소비자들의 선호도가 높은 저지방 부위의 생산 증대 효과를 기대할 수 있다고 판단된다. 이러한 각각 품종의 특성은 우수한 품종개발에 기초자료로써 활용 될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Meat Trade Association(KMTA). 2018. Available from: http://www.kmta.or.kr/kr/data/stats_spend.php
  2. G. W. Kim, S. E. Kim, "Analysis of the domestic consumer's preference and consumption behaviors on pork", Journal of Animal Science and Technolog y, Vol.51, No.1, pp.81-90, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2009.51.1.081
  3. J. H. Hwamg, S. M. An, D. H. Park, D. K. Kang, T. W. Kim, H. C. Park, J. I. Ha, C. W. Kim, "The identification of non-synonymous SNP in the Enoyl-CoA delta isomerase 2 (ECI2) gene and its Association with Meat Quality Traits in Berkshire pigs", The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture, Vol.30, No.4, pp.277-284, 2018. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2018.30.4.277
  4. K. B. Ko, G. D. Kim, D. G. Kang, Y. H. Kim, I. D. Yang, Y. C. Ryu, "Comparison of pork quality and muscle fiber characteristics between Jeju Black Pig and Domesticated Pig Breeds", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.55, No.5, pp.467-473, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.5.467
  5. D. G. Yim, K. C. Nam, "Effects of three-way crossbred on physicochemical traits amd sensory evaluation of pork butts", Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, Vol.50, No.6, pp.105-112, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.015
  6. J. A. Kim, E. S. Cho, M. J. Lee, Y. D. Jeong, Y. H. Choi, K. H. Cho, H. J. Chung, S. Y. Baek, Y. S. Kim, S. J. Sa, J. K. Hong, "Comparison of meat quality characteristics of Two Different Three-way Crossbred Pigs (Landrace $\times$ Yorkshire $\times$ Duroc and andrace $\times$ Yorkshire $\times$ Woori black pig)", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industeial cooperation Society, Vol.20, No.10, pp.195-202, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.10.195
  7. M. J. Lee, E. S. Cho, T. J. Choi, Y. M. Kim, Y. S. Kim, Y. D. Jeong, N. H. Kim, K. H. Cho, "Comparison of meat quality characteristics of Yorkshire, Duroc, Pietrain and Crossbred pigs (Duroc $\times$ Pietrain)", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industeial cooperation Society, Vol.19, No.1, pp.116-125, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.11.116
  8. J. Glinoubol, S. Jaturasitha, P. Mahinchaib, M. Wicke, M. Kreuzer, "Effects of Crossbreding Thai Native or Duroc pigs with Pietrain pigs on carcass and meat quality", Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, Vol.5, pp.133-138, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.020
  9. V. Calcagno, C. D. Mazancourtl, "glmulti: An R Package for Easy Automated Model Selection with (Generalized) Linear Models" Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 34, no. 12, pp.1-29. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i12
  10. M. J. Lee, S. D. Kim, C. B. Yang, S. S. Lee, D. Y. Koh, I. S. Choi, W. H. Kim, J. G. Choi, "Estimation of Adjustment Factors for Seasonal Effects on Age 90 kg Body Weight and Backfat Thickness in Duroc Pigs", Ann Animal Resources Science, Vol.26, No.2, pp.67-74, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12718/AARS.2015.26.2.67
  11. D. B. Edwards, R. O. Bates, W. N. Osburn, "Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for growth and composition", Journal of Animal Science, Vol.84, No.2, pp.266-275, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.842266x
  12. R Saintilan, I. Merour, S. Schwob, P. Sellier, J. Bidanel, H. Gilbert, "Genetic parameters and halothane genotype effect for residual feed intake in Pietrain growing pigs", Journal of Livestock Science, Vol.42. pp.203-209, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.07.013
  13. F. Labroue, R. Gueblez, M. Meunier-Salaum, P. Sellier, "Feed intake behaviour of group-housed Pietrain and Large White growing pigs", Annales de zootechnie, INRA/EDP Sciences, Vol.48. No.4, pp.247-261, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19990402
  14. W. C. Smith, G. Pearson, "Comparative voluntary feed intakes, growth performance, carcass composition, and meat quality of Large White, Landrace, and Duroc pigs", New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Vol.14. No.1, pp.43-50, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1986.10426123
  15. R. Saintilan, I. Merour, L. Brossard, T. Tribout, J. Y. Dourmad, P. Sellier, J. Bidanel, J. Milgen, H. Gilbert, "Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: Relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits", Journal of Animal Science, Vol.91, No.6, pp.2542-2554, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5687
  16. C. H. Do, "Estimation of carcass cut traits in live pigs", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.49, No.2, pp.203-212, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.2.203
  17. D. B. Edwards, R. O. Bates, W. N. Osburn, "Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for carcass and meat quality measures", Journal of Animal Science, Vol.81, No.8, pp.1895-1899, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8181895x
  18. Z. B. Johnson, R. A. Nugent, "Heritability of body length and measures of body density and their relationship to backfat thickness and lion muscle area in swine", Journal of Animal Science, Vol.81, No.8, pp.1943-1949, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8181943x
  19. H. S. Kim, H. S. Yang, J. I. Lee, S. T. Joo, J. T. Jeon, J. G. Lee, "Effects of the Mating System on Retail Cut Yield and Meat Quality in Commercial Pigs", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.49, No.3, pp.379-386, 2007. DOI:http://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.3.379
  20. H. S. Kim, B. W. Kim, H. Y. Kim, H. T. Iim, H. S. Yang, J. I. Lee, Y. K. Joo, C. H. Do, S. T. Joo, J. T. Jeon, J. G. Lee, "Breed effects of terminal sires on carcass traits and real retail cut yields in commercial pig industry", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.49, No.1, pp.9-14, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.1.009
  21. M. J. Park, D. M. Ha, H. W. Shin, S. H. Lee, W. K. Kim, S. H. Ha, H. S. Yang, J. Y. Jeong, S. T. Joo, C. Y. Lee, "Growth efficiency, carcass quality characteristics and profitability of 'high'-market weight pigs", Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Vol.49, No.4, pp.459-470, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.4.459
  22. J. A. Correa, L. Faucitano, J. P. Laforest, J. Rivest, M. Marcoux, C. Gariepy, "Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates", Meat Science, Vol.72, No.1, pp.91-99, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.006
  23. J. Pulkrabek, J. Pavlik, L. Valis, M. Vitek, "Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion", Czech Journal of Animal Science, Vol.51, No.1, pp.18-23, 2006. https://doi.org/10.17221/3904-cjas