환경생물 (Korean Journal of Environmental Biology)

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.30-39
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-9999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7851(eISSN)
한국환경생물학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Biology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

어도 개보수에 따른 어류 자원량 및 경제적 가치 평가: 삼척오십천 사례

Assessment of fish stocks and economic value in accordance with fishway renovation: Case study of Samcheokoshipcheon0010 Weir

  • 투고 : 2019.11.08
  • 심사 : 2020.01.20
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

SOW-0010의 어도 개보수 전·후 자원량을 분석한 결과 개보수 이후 평균자원량은 약 4.6배 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 경제적 가치는 어도 개보수 전 2014년 약 5.3백만원에서 어도 개보수 후 2015년 약 23.9백만원, 2016년 약 3.0백만원, 2017년 약 10.4백만원, 2018년 약 22.4백만원, 2019년 약 27.1백만원으로 매년 증감패턴이 다르게 나타났다. 2016년을 제외하고 전체적으로 개보수 이후 경제적 가치는 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 이는 다양한 회유성어종의 유입과 담수어류의 국지적 이동이 증가했기 때문으로 판단한다. 자원량 변화에 따른 경제적 가치변동을 지수함수를 적용하여 분석한 결과 모델계수는 0.582였으며, 이에 따른 최대 경제적 가치는 30.4백만원인 것으로 추정되었다. 군집 내 경제성어종의 비율과 점유율이 높을수록 계수값이 증가하고 이에 따라 경제적 가치가 높아질 것으로 예상한다.

The changes in fish stock and biomass before and after fishway renovation located in a Korean estuary were studied and fluctuations in the economic value of the fish resources were estimated. The target fishway located in the east coast area in Korea was renovated in 2014 from the small fish ladder to the ice-harbor fishway. Monitoring was continued for five consecutive years after the renovation(2015 to 2019). Since the renovation of the fish passage, the economic values increased with increases in the fishery resources, except for in 2016 when the drought impact was severe. The yearly average incremental increase in the five years after the renovation was about 227%. The increase in economic value is believed to be due to the increased population of migratory fish as a result of habitat expansion. The exponential rise model showed an increase in economic value with increasing fishery resources (R2=0.896). The model coefficient contributing to economic analysis was 0.582 and the maximum economic value after the renovation was estimated at about 30.4 million. The economic value would be a useful index for quantitative comparison in terms of ecosystem services before and after renovation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha SB, JU Seong, JO kim and JC Park. 2015. Evaluation of fish migration ratio at the fishway constructed in weir. J. Environ. Sci. Int. 24:229-236. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2015.24.2.229
  2. Chae BS, HB Song and JY Park. 2019. A Field Guide to the Freshwater Fishes of Korea. LG Evergreen Foundation, Korea.
  3. Choi JS, HK Byeun and KS Cho. 1995. Studies on stream conditions and fish community in Osip Stream (Samchuk County). Korean J. Limnol. 28:263-270.
  4. Choi JW and KG An. 2013. Ecological health assessments on stream order in Southern Han River watershed and physical habitat assessments. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 31:440-447. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2013.31.4.440
  5. Choi KC, SR Jeon, IS Kim and YM Son. 1984. Korea Freshwater Fish Distribution Map. Jungmoonsa. Seoul.
  6. de Groot RS, R Alkemade, L Braat, L Hein and L Wilemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 7:260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  7. Joo WY, HS Kwon, JY Jang, HJ Bae, PM Jung, EJ Bang, JI Kim, MY Kim, CW Seo and JC Choi. 2017. National Ecosystem Services Assessment "National Ecosystem Service Strategy and Action Plan". National Institute of Ecology. Seocheon, Korea.
  8. Jordan F, S Coyne and JC Trexler. 1997. Sampling fishes in vegetated habitats: effects of habitat structure on sampling characteristics of the 1-m2 trap. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126:1012-1020. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1997)126<1012:SFIVHE>2.3.CO;2
  9. Karjalainen TP, M Marttunen, S Sarkki and AM Rytkonen. 2013. Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: An analytic-deliberative approach. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40:54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001
  10. Kim IS and JY Park. 2002. Freshwater Fishes of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Ltd. Seoul, Korea.
  11. King M. 2007. Fisheries Biology, Assessment and management, 2nd edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Hoboken, NJ.
  12. Lee EJ, YI Seo, HW Park, HJ Kang and CI Zhang. 2015. A study on the comparison of spawning biomass per recruit analysis for fisheries management of small yellow croaker caught by drift gill net. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Technol. 51:535-544. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2015.51.4.535
  13. Lee SJ and KG An. 2016. Distributions of endangered fish species and their relations to chemical water quality-ecological stream health in Geum-River watershed. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 30:986-995. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.6.986
  14. Lee SJ, HS Park and KG An. 2017. Preliminary environmental impact assessments on fish compositions and the ecological health of Jeokbyeok River on the road construction of Muju-Geumsan region. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 26:27-43. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2017.26.1.27
  15. Lim JH, YI Seo and CI Zhang. 2018. A study on the forecasting biomass according to the changes in fishing intensity in the Korean waters of the East Sea. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol. 54:217-223. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2018.54.3.217
  16. MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  17. Maceina MJ and SJ Rider. 1993. Use of a catch-depletion method to estimate population density of age-0 largemouth bass in submersed vegetation. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 13:847-851. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1993)013<0847:UOACDM>2.3.CO;2
  18. Milhous RT, MA Updike and DM Schneider. 1989. Physical Habitat Simulation System Reference Manual - Version II. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 26. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C.
  19. Nam YM. 1996. Current status of freshwater fish from Korea. pp. 31-45. In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Limnology Symposium. The Korean Society of Limnology.
  20. NIFS. 2016. Inland Water Fisheries Resources and Environmental Survey Manual. SP-2015-FR-003. National Institute of Fisheries Science. Busan, Korea.
  21. Rojas LP and TJ Minello. 1997. Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: a review of sampling design with focus on gear selection. Estuaries 20:199-213. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352731
  22. Stevens PW. 2006. Sampling fish communities in saltmarsh impoundments in the northern Indian River Lagoon, Florida: cast net and culvert trap gear testing. Fla. Sci. 69:135-147.
  23. TEEB. 2010. Ecological and Economic Foundations, Kumar P (ed.). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Routledge, UK.