환경생물 (Korean Journal of Environmental Biology)

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-15
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-9999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7851(eISSN)
한국환경생물학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Biology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사향쥐(Ondrtra cuniculus)의 정착 및 서식지 이용에 관한 연구

Studies on the establishment and characteristics of habitat use of muskrat(Ondrtra zibethicus) in South Korea

  • 김영채 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀) ;
  • 홍선희 (한경대학교 식물생명환경과학과) ;
  • 이창우 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀) ;
  • 김아름 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀) ;
  • 박희복 (강원대학교 야생동물학연구실) ;
  • 박수곤 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀) ;
  • 김민한 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀) ;
  • 이도훈 (국립생태원 외래생물연구팀)
  • Kim, Young-Chae (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Hong, Sun Hee (Department of Plant Life Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Changwoo (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Areum (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Park, Heebok (Wildlife Research Lab, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Su-Gon (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Minhan (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Do-Hun (Invasive Alien Research Team, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.25
  • 심사 : 2019.12.16
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 침입종 사향쥐의 국내 자연생태계 정착 여부를 확인하였다. 아울러 관리전략 수립과 현장 관리에 필수적인 관리대상지역과 기초적인 행동특성 정보, 서식지 이용에 관한 자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 해외의 사향쥐 관리 동향을 파악하여 정착 단계에 따른 관리 방향을 검토하였다. 그리고 국내 72개 사육농가의 위치정보를 확보하였고, 실태조사를 통해 경기도, 충청남도, 경상북도, 세종특별자치시 소재 5개 지역을 자연 유출 가능성이 높은 지역으로 제시하였다. 또한, 2016년부터 2018년까지 3년간 동일 지점에 서식하는 개체를 모니터링하였다. 2018년 모니터링 지역에서 포획한 개체의 연령이 1.2년생으로 확인되었으며, 2012년 이후 해당지역에 추가적인 개체 보충이 없었다는 사실에 근거하여 국내 자연생태계에 사향쥐가 정착한 것으로 판단하였다. 국내 자연에 정착한 사향쥐는 0.0027 ㎢ (MCP 95%)의 작은 행동권을 나타내었으며, 봄철과 가을철 규칙적인 이동성을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 사향쥐의 서식이 관찰된 지역은 서식환경의 교란이 높게 발생한 지역이었으며, 사향쥐의 흔적 출현 빈도는 부엽식물과 부유식물의 생육이 왕성한 개방수역과 개체의 은신처로 활용 가능한 습생목본 식생유형에서 높게 확인되어 이들의 생태적 특성과 섭식 습성이 그대로 반영되었다. 국제적인 침입종 사향쥐가 국내 생태계에 정착하였고, 향후 확산이 우려되는 만큼 정부 차원의 선제적 대응과 과학적 관리를 위한 필수 자료 구축이 검토될 필요가 있다.

This study was conducted to determine whether invasive muskrats settle in the natural ecosystem of Korea. The study also aimed to provide information on the selection of target areas, basic behavioral characteristics, and habitat use-related data, all of which are essential for effective management strategy establishment and site management. To this end, a trend in international muskrat management was identified to examine the management direction according to the settlement stage. We also secured the location of 72 domestic farmers and classified five regions in Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Gyeongsangbuk-do, and Sejong Special Self-governing City into regions with high potential for natural leakage to raise the need for a quick survey. We determined that muskrats successfully settled in the natural ecosystem of Korea, based on the fact that we consistently identified a muskrat habitat at the same point for three years, from 2016 to 2018, the age of the captured population was estimated to be 1.2 years, and there had been no additional make-up factors near the habitat since 2012. The muskrats that settled in Korea showed a small home range of 0.0027 ㎢ (MCP 95%) and were estimated to show regular mobility before Spring and Autumn. Also, the areas where the muskrat habitat was observed had a high level of habitat environment disturbance and their ecological and food intake characteristics reflected that disturbance. Muskrat traces were high in hydrophyte vegetation, which can be used as a hideout in open waters and where the growth of both floating leaved plants and floating plants are prevalent. Since international invasive muskrats have already settled in the domestic ecosystem and there is concern about their proliferation in the future, the government must consider a preemptive response and scientific management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aldous SE. 1947. Muskrat trapping on Sand Lake national wildlife refuge, South Dakota. J. Wildl. Manage. 11:77-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3796042
  2. Anderson CB, R Rozzi, JC Torres-Mura, SM Mcgehee, MF Sherriffs, E Schuttler and AD Rosemond. 2006. Exotic vertebrate fauna in the remote and pristine sub-Antarctic Cape Horn Archipelago, Chile. Biodivers. Conserv. 15:3295-3313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-0605-y
  3. Applegate VC and HE Predmore. 1947. Age classes and patterns of primeness in a fall collection of muskrat pelts. J. Wildl. Manage. 11:324-330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3796212
  4. Baker SJ. 2010. Control and eradication of invasive mammals in Great Britain. Rev. Sci. Tech. 29:311. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.29.2.1981
  5. Becker K. 1972. Muskrats in Central Europe and their control. pp. 18-21. In Proceedings of the 5th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
  6. Beer JR and RK Meyer. 1951. Seasonal changes in the endocrine organs and behavior patterns of the muskrat. J. Mammal. 32:173-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375373
  7. BCSC. 1999. Recommendation No. 77. on the eradication of non-native terrestrial vertebrates. Bern Convention Standing Committee. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1489673
  8. Beshears WW and AO Haugen. 1953. Muskrats in relation to farm ponds. J. Wildl. Manage. 17:450-456. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797050
  9. Bobrov VV, SA Al'bov and LA Khlyap. 2008. Impact of invasive mammal species on natural ecosystems: An example of the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve. Russ. J. Ecol. 39:292-298. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413608040097
  10. Burghause F. 1988. Der Bisam-vom Pelztier zum Schadling. Einwanderer - Zur Geschichte und Biologie eingeschleppter und eingewanderter Arten in Rheinland-Pfalz. I.: Saugetiere. 27-37.
  11. CAAS. Database of invasive alien species in China. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science. http://www.chinaias.cn/wjPart/SpeciesSearch.aspx?daohan=0
  12. CABI. 2010. Climate change and invasive alien species. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. https://www.cabi.org/Uploads/CABI/expertise/invasive-alien -species-working-paper.pdf
  13. Caley MJ. 1987. Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in muskrats. Anim. Behav. 35:1225-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80180-X
  14. Ceballos G. 2014. Mammals of Mexico. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.
  15. Clark WR and DW Kroeker. 1993. Population dynamics of muskrats in experimental marshes at Delta, Manitoba. Can. J. Zool. 71:1620-1628. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-228
  16. Cochran WW and RD Lord Jr. 1963. A radio-tracking system for wild animals. J. Wildl. Manage. 9-24.
  17. CBD. 2002. Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7197
  18. Clark WR and DW Kroeker. 1993. Population dynamics of muskrats in experimental marshes at Delta, Manitoba. Can. J. Zool. 71:1620-1628. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-228
  19. DAISIE. 2011. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. Delivering Alien Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/
  20. Danell K. 1978. Population dynamics of the muskrat in a shallow Swedish lake. J. Anim. Ecol. 697-709.
  21. Danell K. 1996. Introductions of aquatic rodents: lessons of the muskrat Ondatra zibethicus invasion. Wildlife Biol. 2:213-220. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.1996.021
  22. Diemer B. 1996. Der Bisam in Baden-Wurttemberg. Akademie fur Natur-und Umweltschutz Baden-Wurttemberg (Hrsg.): Neophyten, Neozeoen-Gefahr für die heimische Natur. 182-186.
  23. Doude van Troostwijk WJ. 1978. Muskrat control in the Netherlands. pp. 114-117. In Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings collection: Proceedings of the 8th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
  24. Earhart CM. 1969. The influence of soil texture on the structure, durability, and occupancy of muskrat burrows in farm ponds. Calif. Fish Game 55:179-196.
  25. Erickson HR. 1963. Reproduction, growth, and movement of muskrats inhabiting small water areas in New York State. NY Fish Game J. 10:90-117.
  26. Errington PL. 1954. On the hazards of overemphasizing numerical fluctuations in studies of "cyclic" phenomena in muskrat populations. J. Wildl. Manage. 18:66-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797617
  27. Errington PL. 1961. Muskrats and Marsh Management. Stackpole Co., Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.
  28. Errington PL. 1963. Muskrat Populations. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
  29. Genovesi P and R Scalera. 2008. Ondatra zibethicus. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe (DAISIE).
  30. GISD. Search species. Global Invasive Species Database. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/
  31. Glass BP. 1952. Factors affecting the survival of the plains Muskrat, Ondatra zibethica cinnamomina, in Oklahoma. J. Wildl. Manage. 16:484-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797497
  32. Hall ER. 1955. Handbook of mammals of Kansas. Univ. Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. 7:303.
  33. IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Popul. Dev. Rev. 45:680-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12283
  34. IUCN. 2000. IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. https://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/ac/16/Inf16-10.pdf
  35. Keyser PD. 1989. Movement patterns of Muskrats in a Louisiana coastal marsh. Proc. Annu. Cont. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 43:437-443.
  36. Korea National Arboretum and The Plant Taxonomic Society of Korea. 2017. A Synonymic List of Vascular Plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon.
  37. Krauss M. 1990. Die Nahrung des Bisams (Ondatra zibethicus) an der Havel in Berlin -West und der schadigende Einfluss auf das Rohricht. Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung. 71:141-181.
  38. Lee DH and JH Kil. 2013. Ecological Characteristic and Management of Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) in Korea. National Institute of Environmental Research. Incheon, Korea.
  39. Lee DH, DE Kim, S Kim, H Kim, I Hwang, D Kim, HJ Lee, H Lee, HR Song and JM Kim. 2014. The Study on the Inhabitation Status of Nutria (Myocastor coypus). National Institute of Ecology. Seochoen, Korea.
  40. Lee TB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea, Vol. 1, 2. Hayangmunsa, Seoul.
  41. Lee WT. 1996a. Lineamenta Florae Koerane. Academy Press, Seoul.
  42. Lee WT. 1996b. Coloured Standard Illustrations of Korean plants. Acedemy Press, Seoul.
  43. Lee YM, SH Park, SY Jung, SH Oh and JC Yang. 2011. Study on the current status of naturalized plants in South Korea. Korean J. Plant Tax. 41:87-101. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2011.41.1.087
  44. Long JL. 2003. Introduced Mammals of the World. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Connecticut.
  45. MacArthur RA. 1978. Winter movements and home range of the muskrat. Can. Field-Nat. 92:345-349.
  46. MacArthur RA and M Aleksiuk. 1979. Seasonal microenvironments of the muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) in a northern marsh. J. Mammal. 60:146-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379765
  47. Mallach N. 1971. Markierungsversuche zur Analyse des Aktionsraums und der Ortsbewegungen des Bisams (Ondatra zibethica L.). Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde und Pflanzenschutz. 44:129-136.
  48. ME. 2019. National Mid-Long Term Management Plan of Alien Species (2019-2023). Ministry of Environment. Sejong, Korea.
  49. Mech LD and SM Barber. 2002. A Critique of Wildlife Radio-Tracking and Its Use in National Parks. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. Jamestown, Virginia.
  50. Miller J. 1994. Muskrats. pp. 61-69. In The Hanbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. University of Nebraska Press. Nebraska.
  51. Moens R. 1978. Etude bio-ecologique du Rat musque en Belgique. Parasitica 34:57-121.
  52. Mohr CO. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 37:223-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2421652
  53. Musser GG and MD Carleton. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. pp. 894-1531. In Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, Wilson DE and DM Reeder (eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland.
  54. Neal TJ. 1968. A comparison of two muskrat populations. Iowa State. J. Sci. 43:193-210.
  55. Neronov VM, LA Khlyap, VV Bobrov and AA Warshavsky. 2008. Alien species of mammals and their impact on natural ecosystems in the biosphere reserves of Russia. Integr. Zool. 3:83-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00084.x
  56. Newak, R. 1991. Walker's Mammals of the World Vol 1. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland.
  57. NIES. 2019. Invasive Species of Japan. National Institute for Environmental Studies. https://www.nies.go.jp/biodiversity/invasive/
  58. Niethammer J and F Krapp. 1982. Handbuch der Saugetiere Europas. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden.
  59. NNSS. 2015. GB Non-Native Species Secretariat. Non Native Species. https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/nonnativespecies
  60. NOBANIS. 2006. Invasive alien species fact sheet - Ondatra zibethicus. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. http://www.nobanis.org
  61. NOBANIS. 2011. Search alien species. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. https://www.nobanis.org/search-alien-species/
  62. NOBANIS. 2013. Invasive alien species fact sheet - Ondatra zibethicus. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. https://www.nobanis.org/globalassets/speciesinfo/o/ondatra-zibethicus/ondatra_zibethicus.pdf
  63. Nummi P, VM Vaananen and J Malinen. 2006. Alien grazing: indirect effects of muskrats on invertebrates. Biol. Invasions 8:993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-1197-x
  64. Otgonbaatar M, S Shar and AP Saveljev. 2018. Fifty years after introduction: Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus population of Khar-Us Lake, Western Mongolia. Russ. J. Theriol. 17:32-38. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusjtheriol.17.1.03
  65. Paini DR, AW Sheppard, DC Cook, PJ De Barro, SP Worner and MB Thomas. 2016. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113:7575-7579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602205113
  66. PAS. 2012. Alien Species in Poland. Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences. Krakow, Poland. http://www.iop.krakow.pl/ias/Baza.aspx
  67. Pelikan J, J Svoboda and J Kvet. 1970. On some relations between the production of Typha latifolia and a muskrat population. Zool. Listy 19:303-320.
  68. Peshev D. 1996. Review of the status of mammals in Bulgaria. Hystrix 8:55-59.
  69. Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography; Being the Collected Papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  70. Sather JH. 1958. Biology of the Great Plains muskrat in Nebraska. Wildl. Monogr. 2:1-35.
  71. SCBD. 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.
  72. Seaman DE and RA Powell. 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of Kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075-2085. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265701
  73. Shanks CE and GC Arthur. 1952. Muskrat movements and population dynamics in Missouri farm ponds and streams. J. Wildl. Manage. 16:138-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3796922
  74. Sikes RS and WL Gannon. 2011. Guidelines of the American society of mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92:235-253. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-F-355.1
  75. Simpson MR and S Boutin. 1989. Muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus, population responses to harvest on the Old Crow Flats, Yukon Territory. Can. Field-Nat. 103:420-422.
  76. Skyriene G and A Paulauskas. 2012. Distribution of invasive muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) and impact on ecosystem. Ekologija 58:357-367.
  77. Walker EP, F Warnick, SE Hamlet, KI Lange, MA Davis, HE Uible and JL Paradiso. 1975. Mammals of the world. Volumes I and II (No. 3rd edition). Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland.
  78. White G and R Garrott. 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. Academic press. San Diego, California.
  79. Willner GR, GA Feldhamer, EE Zueker and JA Chapman. 1980. Ondatra zibethicus. Mammal. Spec. 141:1-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504016
  80. Yan X, L Zhenyu, WP Gregg and L Dianmo. 2001. Invasive species in China - an overview. Biodivers. Conserv. 10:1317-1341. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016695609745
  81. Yim YJ and ES Jeon. 1980. Distribution of naturalized plant in the Korea peninsula. Korean J. Bot. 23:69-83.
  82. Zietsman L. 2011. Observations on Environmental Change in South Africa's. SUN Media.