Journal of Korean Dental Science

  • 제13권2호
  • /
  • Pages.67-72
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-4742(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-7651(eISSN)
대한치의학회 (Korean Academy of Dental Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Office-based 2-stage Posterior Maxillary Segmental Osteotomy for Mandibular Implant Placement: Clinical Study

  • Jeong, Bong-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Oh, Yeonjin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Jo, Hyunmi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Junho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Byung-Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Ohe, Joo-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.19
  • 심사 : 2020.09.11
  • 발행 : 2020.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This clinical study presented the effectiveness of 2-stage posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (PMSO) under local anesthesia in gaining interarch space to restore the posterior mandibular segment with dental implants. Materials and Methods: Nine patients who received two-stage PMSO for mandibular implant placement from 2003 to 2011 were included in the study. Of the 9 patients, 7 were female and 2 were male. Ages ranged form 28 to 72 (mean 46.6). Potential complications were investigated such as sinus infection, survival of bone segment, inflammatory root resorption of adjacent teeth, relapse of bone segment and timing of implant placement, delivery of implant prosthesis and stability of bone segment. Result: None of the patients showed relapse or complication. Bone segments were stabilized by opposed implant prosthesis. Conclusion: Office-based 2-stage PMSO under local anesthesia can be considered a stable and predictable procedure. Also pedicle damage can be avoided by allowing favor of blood supply to the bone segments. From these advantages, it can be concluded that this surgical procedure can decrease post-operative complications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Christensen GJ. When it is best to remove a tooth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997; 128: 635-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0263
  2. Rosen PS, Forman D. The role of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of severe dentoalveolar extrusion. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130: 1619-22. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0101
  3. Schoeman R, Subramanian L. The use of orthognathic surgery to facilitate implant placement: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 682-4.
  4. Schuchardt K. Forms of the open bite and theirs operative treatment options. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1955; 1: 222-30.
  5. Kufner J. Experience with a modified procedure for correction of open bite. Trans Int Conf Oral Surg. 1970; 18-23.
  6. Basa S, Varol A, Sener ID, Sertgoz A. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for restoring the mandible with dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 340-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60080-3
  7. Ng J, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 709-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.049
  8. Hibi H, Ueda M. Occlusal restoration with surgical interventions-osteotomy, implant surgery, and tooth transplantation: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70019-2
  9. Basa S, Belli E. Posterior maxillary ostectomy for mandibular implant insertion. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995; 10: 147-50.
  10. Mopsik ER, Buck RP, Connors JO, Watts LN. Surgical intervention to reestablish adequate intermaxillary space before fixed or removable prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977; 95: 957-60. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0176
  11. West RA, Epker BN. Posterior maxillary surgery its place in the treatment of dentofacial deformities. J Oral Surg. 1972; 30: 562-3.
  12. Bell WH, Levy BM. Revascularization and bone healing after posterior maxillary osteotomy. J Oral Surg. 1971; 29: 313-20.
  13. Svensson B, Adell R, Swartz B. Correction of implant malalignment by segmental osteotomy: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 459-63.
  14. Hwang JH, Jung BY, Lim CS, Cha IH, Park W. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy concomitant with sinus lift using a piezoelectric device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 2339-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.04.023
  15. O'Ryan F, Schendel S. Nasal anatomy and maxillary surgery. II. Unfavorable nasolabial esthetics following the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1989; 4: 75-84.
  16. Hokett SD, Hoen MM. Inflammatory cervical root resorption following segmental orthognathic surgery. A case report. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 219-26. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.219
  17. Lownie JF, Cleaton-Jones PE, Fatti LP, Lownie MA, Forbes M, Bird M. Vascularity of the dental pulp after segmental osteotomy in the chacma baboon (Papio ursinus). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 36: 285-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90712-4
  18. Lownie JF, Cleaton-Jones PE, Coleman H, Forbes M. Long-term histologic changes in the dental pulp after posterior segmental osteotomies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87: 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70212-X