물과 미래 (Water for future)

한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지

그린뉴딜 시대의 유역 생태계 관리: 생태계서비스를 중심으로

Watershed ecosystem management in the Green New Deal era: focusing on ecosystem services

  • 천정윤 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 박윤선 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 차은지 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 김준성 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 홍현정 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 김충기 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실)
  • 발행 : 2020.06.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 한국환경정책·평가연구원에서 수행한 "생물다양성협약 이행 지원 프로그램 기획·운영(GP2020-08)" 및 "환경·경제 통합분석을 위한 환경가치종합연구(GP2020-10)" 과제의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다.

참고문헌

  1. Yoon, J. Y., 2020, Development Direction of Korean New Deal: The Green New Deal, KEI Environmental Forum, 2020.5.28. Seoul, Korea. pp. 1-20.
  2. Lee, J. H., 2007, Vision and Policy Direction of Water Environmental Policy, Bulletin of Korea environmental preservation association, 29(367), 8-11.
  3. Lee, C.H. et al. (2016) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute.
  4. Ahn, S.E. et al. (2017) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute.
  5. Ahn, S.E. et al. (2018) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute.
  6. Kim, H.N. et al. (2019) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute.
  7. Ministry of Environment. (2018) Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Pilot Mapping Project I, Ministry of Environment (ME)
  8. Ministry of Environment. (2019) Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Pilot Mapping Project II, Ministry of Environment (ME)
  9. Jung et al. (2015). Development of Natural Resources Valuation Assessment for Decision-Making Process. Ministry of Environment.
  10. Ministry of Environment, (2003). The basin of life.
  11. Committee for the Management of the Geum River Basin (2018). Research on estabilizing conflict resolusion and operation plan for integrated drainage basin management. 146p.
  12. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2020). Healthy Watersheds Program. https://www.epa.gov/hwp/examples-biological-condition-assessments-watershed-health
  13. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2020). Developing a Watershed Vulnerability Index https://www.epa.gov/hwp/developing-watershed-vulnerability-index
  14. Battle River Watershed Alliance (BRWA). (2020). Watershed Management Planning. https://www.battleriverwatershed.ca/watershed-management-planning/
  15. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, (2014). Approved Water Management Plan for the Battle River Basin, p.82.
  16. Conservation Ontario, (2020). https://conservationontario.ca/policy-priorities/integrated-watershed-management/
  17. Ministry of Environment (ME), 2016, The 2nd Strategic Plan for Water Environment Management, pp. 1-96.
  18. Ministry of Environment (ME), 2019, A study on the establishment of a healthy integrated water management system from ditch to estuary.
  19. Slocombe, D. S. (1993). Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management. BioScience, 43(9),612-622. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312148
  20. Caldwell, L. K. (1970). The ecosystem as a criterion for public land policy. Nat. Res. J. 10(2), 203-221.
  21. Mcintosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  22. Ahn, S. E., & Kim, G. (2016). Economic Values of Freshwater Ecosystem Services from Demand and Supply Perspectives. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng., 38(10), 580-587. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.10.580
  23. Yang, W., & Lu, Q. (2018). Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(3), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1459867
  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.: Island Press.
  25. Goldstein, J. H., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T. K. Ennaanay, D., Hannahs, N., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S., Wolny, S., & Daily, G. C. (2012). Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 7565-7570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201040109
  26. Chun, J., Kim, C.-K, Kang, W., Park. H., Kim, G., & Lee, W.-K. (2019). Sustainable Management of Carbon Sequestration Service in Areas with High Development Pressure: Considering land Use Changes and Carbon Costs. Sustainability, 11(18):5116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185116
  27. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), (2016). The National Atlas of Korea. National Geography Information Institute (NGII). Suwon, Korea.
  28. Kim, M.-K., Kwon, S.-I., Jung. G.-B., Hong, S.-C., Chae, M.-J., Yun, S.-G., & So, K.-H. (2013). Small-Scale Pond Effects on Reducing Pollutants Load from a Paddy Field. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 32, 355-358. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.4.355
  29. Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Draz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., Perrings, C., Reid, W. V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R. J., & Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 1305-1312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106
  30. Chung, M.G., and Kang, H. (2013). A Review of Ecosystem Service Studies: Concept, Approach and Future Work in Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 36, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.001
  31. Fu, C., and Y. Q. Lin. (2009). "On Livelihood Assets of Immigrants of the Returning Fannland to Lake in Poyang Lake Region." Journal of Nanchang University 40:77-82.
  32. Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
  33. Lu, Y., He. T., (2014). Assessing the Effects of Regional Payment for Watershed Services Program on Water Quality Using an Intervention Analysis Model. Sci. Total Environ. 493:1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.096
  34. Rodriguez, J. P., Beard., Jr., T. D., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-offs across Space, Time and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society, 11, 28.
  35. Rong, Y., F. Yuan, and L. Ma. 2014. "Effectiveness of Exclosures for Restoring Soils and Vegetation Degraded by Overgrazing in the Junggar Basin, China." Grassland Science 60:118-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12048
  36. Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R., & Schroter, D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025
  37. Kim, J.-E. (2014). The value of Ecosystem Services based on Land Use in Shinangun, Jeonnam, Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 47(3), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.3.202
  38. Cole, L. E., Bhagwat, S. A., & Willis, K. J. (2014). Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat Commun, 5, 3906. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4906
  39. Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Araujo, I. S., 햢ila-Pires, T. C., Bonaldo, A. B., Costa, J. E., Esposito, M. C., Ferreira, L. V., Hawes, J., Hernandez. M. I. M., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R. N., Lo-Man-Hung, N. F., Malcolm, J. R., Martins, M. B., Mestre, L. A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A. L., Overal, W. L., Parry, L., Peters, S. L., Ribeiro-Junior, M. A., da Silva, M. N. F., da Silva Motta, C., & Peres, C. A. (2007). Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 18555-18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104
  40. Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., & Sodhi, N. S. (2011). Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature, 478, 378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425
  41. United Nations (2016) Sustainable Development Goals.
  42. Chu, J. M., Moon, H. J., Lee, H. W., Ahn, S. E., Lee, N. J., et al. (2014). Comparison of Payments for Envionmental Services and Cooperation Studies between Korea and China, Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Korea, pp. 1-108.
  43. Zhang, Q. 2016. "Economic Incentive Effect Analysis of Grassland Ecological Subsidy Award Mechanism." Gansu Social Sciences 5:234-238.
  44. Van, E., H. Lin, Y. Dang, and C. Xia. 2014. "The Spatiotemporal Changes of Vegetation Cover in Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Region during 20002012." Acta Ecologica Sinica 34:5007-5020.
  45. Xu, W., Xiao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, L., Hull, V., ... & Jiang, L. (2017). Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7), 1601-1606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620503114
  46. Wu Yang & Qiaoling Lu (2018) Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4:3, 73-84, https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1459867
  47. Zheng, H., B. E. Robinson, Y.-C. Liang, S. Polasky, D.-C. Ma, F.-C. Wang, M. Ruckelshaus, Z.-Y. Ouyang, and G.C. Daily. 2013. "Benefits, Costs, and Livelihood Implications of a Regional Payment for Ecosystem Service Program." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 16681-16686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312324110
  48. SFA. 2014. Analysis Report of 2014 National Forestry Statistical Report. Beijing: State Forestry Administration.dings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), 16681-16686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312324110
  49. Liu, J. 2015. "On the Incentive Effect of Ecological Transfer Payments on Environment Governance of Local Governments: Evidence from 46 Eastern Prefecture-Level Cities." Journal of Finance and Economics 02: 54-65. https://doi.org/10.12735/jfe.v2i2p54