DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Signal transduction of C-terminal phosphorylation sites for equine follicle stimulating hormone receptor (eFSHR)

  • Seong, Hoon-Ki (Animal Biotechnology, Graduate School of Future Convergence Technology, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Choi, Seung-Hee (Animal Biotechnology, Graduate School of Future Convergence Technology, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Byambaragchaa, Munkhzaya (Animal Biotechnology, Graduate School of Future Convergence Technology, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Min, Kwan-Sik (Animal Biotechnology, Graduate School of Future Convergence Technology, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2020.05.19
  • Accepted : 2020.05.29
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

Equine follicle stimulating hormone receptor (eFSHR) has a large extracellular domain and an intracellular domain containing approximately 10 phosphorylation sites within the G protein-coupled receptor. This study was conducted to analyze the function of phosphorylation sties at the eFSHR C-terminal region. We constructed a mutant of eFSHR, in which the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail was truncated at residue 641 (eFSHR-t641). This removed 10 potential phosphorylation sites from the C-terminal region of the intracellular loop. The eFSHR-wild type (eFSHR-wt) and eFSHR-t641 cDNAs were subcloned into the pCMV-ARMS1-PK2 expression vector. These plasmids were transfected into PathHunter CHO-K1 Parental cells expressing β-arrestin 2 enzyme acceptor fusion protein and analyzed for agonist-induced cAMP response. The cAMP response in cells expressing eFSHR-t641 was lower than the response in cells expressing eFSHR-wt. EC50 values of eFSHR-wt and eFSHR-t641 were 1079 ng/mL and 1834 ng/mL, respectively. eFSHR-t641 was approximately 0.58-fold compared with that of eFSHR-wt. The maximal response in eFSHR-wt and eFSHR-t641 was 24.7 nM and 16.7 nM, respectively. The Rmax value of phosphorylation sites in eFSHR-t641 was also decreased to approximately 68.4% of that in eFSHR-wt. The collective data implicate that the phosphorylation sites in the eFSHR C-terminal region have a pivotal role in signal transduction in PathHunter CHO-K1 cells, and indicate that β-arrestin is involved in coupling the activated receptors to the internalization system.

Keywords

References

  1. Ascoli M. 1996. Functional consequences of the phosphorylation of the gonadotropin receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 52:1647-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(96)00553-9
  2. Banerjee AA and Mahale SD. 2015. Role of the extracellular and intracellular loops of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in its function. Front. Endocrinol. 6:110.
  3. Bhaskaran RS and Ascoli M. 2005. The post-endocytotic fate of the gonadotropin receptors is an important determinant of the desensitization of gonadotropin responses. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 34:447-457. https://doi.org/10.1677/jme.1.01745
  4. Byambaragchaa M, Kim DJ, Kang MH, Min KS. 2018. Site specificity of eel luteinizing hormone N-linked oligosaccharides in signal transduction. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 268:50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.07.015
  5. Duvernay MT, Zhou F, Wu G. 2004. A conserved motif for the transport of G protein-coupled receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. J. Biol. Chem. 279:30741-30750. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M313881200
  6. Galet C, Hirakawa T, Ascoli M. 2004. The postendocytotic trafficking of the human lutropin receptor is mediated by a transferable motif consisting of the C-terminal cysteine and an upstream leucine. Mol. Endocrinol. 18:434-446. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0293
  7. Hipkin RW, Liu X, Ascoli M. 1995. Truncation of the C-terminal tail of the follitropin receptor does not impair the agonist- or phorbol ester-induced receptor phosphorylation and uncoupling. J. Biol. Chem. 270:26683-26689. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.44.26683
  8. Hirakawa T, Galet C, Kishi M, Ascoli M. 2003. GIPC binds to the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) through an unusual PDZ domain binding motif, and it regulates the sorting of the internalized human choriogonadotropin and the density of cell surface hLHR. J. Biol. Chem. 278:49348-49357. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306557200
  9. Kim JM, Byambaragchaa M, Kang MH, Min KS. 2018. The Cterminal phosphorylation sites of eel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor are important role in the signal transduction. Dev. Reprod. 22:143-153. https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2018.22.2.143
  10. Kim JS, Byambaragchaa M, Min KS. 2019. Characterization of constitutively activating eel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 34:267-271. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.4.267
  11. Kishi M, Liu X, Hirakawa T, Reczek D, Bretscher A, Ascoli M. 2001. Identification of two distinct structural motifs that, when added to the C-terminal tail of the rat LH receptor, redirect the internalized hormone-receptor complex from a degradation to a recycling pathway. Mol. Endocrinol. 15:1624-1635. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.15.9.0698
  12. Krishnamurthy H, Kishi H, Shi M, Galet C, Bhaskaran RS, Hirakawa T, Ascoli M. 2003. Postendocytotic trafficking of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-FSH receptor complex. Mol. Endocrinol. 17:2162-2176. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0118
  13. Lee SY, Byambaragchaa M, Kim JS, Seong HK, Kang MH, Min KS. 2017. Biochemical characterization of recombinant equine chorionic gonadotropin (rec-eCG), using CHO cells and PathHunter Parental cells expressing equine luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptors (eLH/CGR). J. Life Sci. 27:864-872. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2017.27.8.864
  14. Martemyanov KA and Garcia-Marcos M. 2018. Making useful gadgets with miniaturized G proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 293:7474-7475. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.H118.002879
  15. Min KS, Liu X, Fabritz J, Jaquette J, Abell AN, Ascoli M. 1998. Mutations that induce constitutive activation and mutations that impair signal transduction modulate the basal and/or agonist-stimulated internalization of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273:34911-34919. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.52.34911
  16. Nakamura K, Krupnick JG, Benovic JL, Ascoli M. 1998. Signaling and phosphorylation-impaired mutants of the rat follitropin receptor reveal an activation- and phosphorylation-independent but arrestin-dependent pathway for internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 273:24346-24354. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.38.24346
  17. Park JJ, JarGal N, Yoon JT, Min KS. 2009. Function of the tethered rec-eCG in rat and equine receptors. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 33:229-236.
  18. Park JJ, JarGal N, Yoon JT, Min KS. 2010. ${\beta}$-subunit 94-96 residues of tethered recombinant equine chorionic gonadotropin are important sites for luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone like activities. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 34:33-40.
  19. Pierce KL, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. 2002. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:639-650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm908
  20. Quintana J, Hipkin RW, Sanchez-Yague J, Ascoli M. 1994. Follitropin (FSH) and a phorbol ester stimulate the phosphorylation of the FSH receptor in intact cells. J. Biol. Chem. 269:8772-8779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37035-7
  21. Sanchez-Yague J, Rodriguez MC, Segaloff DL, Ascoli M. 1992. Truncation of the cytoplasmic tail of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor prevents agonist-induced uncoupling. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7217-7220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42507-0
  22. Schlador ML and Nathanson NM. 1997. Synergistic regulation of m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization and sequestration by G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 and beta-arrestin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:18882-18890. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.30.18882
  23. Wan Q, Okashah N, Inoue A, Nehme R, Carpenter B, Tate CG, Lambert NA. 2018. Mini G protein probes for active G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in live cells. J. Biol. Chem. 293:7466-7473. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.001975
  24. Wang Z, Hipkin RW, Ascoli M. 1996. Progressive cytoplasmic tail truncations of the lutropin-choriogonadotropin receptor prevent agonist- or phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation, impair agonist- or phorbol ester-induced desensitization, and enhance agonist-induced receptor down-regulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 10:748-759. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.10.6.8776735
  25. Wang Z, Liu X, Ascoli M. 1997. Phosphorylation of the lutropin/ choriogonadotropin receptor facilitates uncoupling of the receptor from adenylyl cyclase and endocytosis of the bound hormone. Mol. Endocrinol. 11:183-192. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.11.2.9889
  26. Wu V, Yeerna H, Nohata N, Chiou J, Harismendy O, Raimondi F, Inoue A, Russell RB, Tamayo P, Gutkind JS. 2019. Illuminating the onco-GPCRome: Novel G protein-coupled receptordriven oncocrine networks and targets for cancer immunotherapy. J. Biol. Chem. 294:11062-11086. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev119.005601