DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of salivary versus subgingival bacterial sampling for the detection and quantification of periodontal pathogens

  • Lee, Yoonsub (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hong, Yoojin (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Bome (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Dajung (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Rhyu, In-chul (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2020.04.01
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and validity of subgingival bacterial sampling using a retraction cord, and to evaluate how well this sampling method reflected changes in periodontal conditions after periodontal therapy. Methods: Based on clinical examinations, 87 subjects were divided into a healthy group (n=40) and a periodontitis group (n=47). Clinical measurements were obtained from all subjects including periodontal probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and the plaque index. Saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) as a subgingival bacterial sample were sampled before and 3 months after periodontal therapy. The salivary and subgingival bacterial samples were analyzed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to quantify the following 11 periodontal pathogens: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Tannerella forsythus (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Pavimonas micra (Pm), Campylobacter rectus (Cr), Prevotella nigrescens (Pn), Eikenella corrodens (Ec), and Eubacterium nodatum (En). Results: Non-surgical periodontal therapy resulted in significant decreases in PD (P<0.01), CAL (P<0.01), and BOP (P<0.05) after 3 months. Four species (Pg, Tf, Pi, and Pm) were significantly more abundant in both types of samples in the periodontitis group than in the healthy group. After periodontal therapy, Cr was the only bacterium that showed a statistically significant decrease in saliva, whereas statistically significant decreases in Cr, Pg, and Pn were found in GCF. Conclusions: Salivary and subgingival bacterial sampling with a gingival retraction cord were found to be equivalent in terms of their accuracy for differentiating periodontitis, but GCF reflected changes in bacterial abundance after periodontal therapy more sensitively than saliva.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2017M3A9B6065383).

References

  1. Kornman KS, Page RC, Tonetti MS. The host response to the microbial challenge in periodontitis: assembling the players. Periodontol 2000 1997;14:33-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00191.x
  2. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Periodontal microbial ecology. Periodontol 2000 2005;38:135-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00107.x
  3. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:134-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02419.x
  4. Masunaga H, Tsutae W, Oh H, Shinozuka N, Kishimoto N, Ogata Y. Use of quantitative PCR to evaluate methods of bacteria sampling in periodontal patients. J Oral Sci 2010;52:615-21. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.615
  5. Boutaga K, Savelkoul PH, Winkel EG, van Winkelhoff AJ. Comparison of subgingival bacterial sampling with oral lavage for detection and quantification of periodontal pathogens by real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Periodontol 2007;78:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060078
  6. Alfano MC. The origin of gingival fluid. J Theor Biol 1974;47:127-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90103-9
  7. Kowashi Y, Jaccard F, Cimasoni G. Sulcular polymorphonuclear leucocytes and gingival exudate during experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res 1980;15:151-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1980.tb00269.x
  8. Champagne CM, Buchanan W, Reddy MS, Preisser JS, Beck JD, Offenbacher S. Potential for gingival crevice fluid measures as predictors of risk for periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2003;31:167-80. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2003.03110.x
  9. Teles R, Sakellari D, Teles F, Konstantinidis A, Kent R, Socransky S, et al. Relationships among gingival crevicular fluid biomarkers, clinical parameters of periodontal disease, and the subgingival microbiota. J Periodontol 2010;81:89-98. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090397
  10. Baker PJ, Butler R, Wikesjo UM. Bacterial sampling by absorbent paper points. An in vitro study. J Periodontol 1991;62:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.2.142
  11. Loomer PM. Microbiological diagnostic testing in the treatment of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2004;34:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.003424.x
  12. Jervoe-Storm PM, Alahdab H, Koltzscher M, Fimmers R, Jepsen S. Comparison of curet and paper point sampling of subgingival bacteria as analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Periodontol 2007;78:909-17. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060218
  13. Segata N, Haake SK, Mannon P, Lemon KP, Waldron L, Gevers D, et al. Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol 2012;13:R42. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42
  14. Tanner AC, Paster BJ, Lu SC, Kanasi E, Kent R Jr, Van Dyke T, et al. Subgingival and tongue microbiota during early periodontitis. J Dent Res 2006;85:318-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500407
  15. Haririan H, Andrukhov O, Bertl K, Lettner S, Kierstein S, Moritz A, et al. Microbial analysis of subgingival plaque samples compared to that of whole saliva in patients with periodontitis. J Periodontol 2014;85:819-28. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.130306
  16. Belstrom D, Grande MA, Sembler-Moller ML, Kirkby N, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, et al. Influence of periodontal treatment on subgingival and salivary microbiotas. J Periodontol 2018;89:531-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0377
  17. Boutaga K, van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Savelkoul PH. Comparison of real-time PCR and culture for detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4950-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.11.4950-4954.2003
  18. Boutaga K, van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Savelkoul PH. Periodontal pathogens: a quantitative comparison of anaerobic culture and real-time PCR. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2005;45:191-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsim.2005.03.011
  19. Jervoe-Storm PM, Koltzscher M, Falk W, Dorfler A, Jepsen S. Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection and quantification of five putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:778-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00740.x
  20. Lau L, Sanz M, Herrera D, Morillo JM, Martin C, Silva A. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction versus culture: a comparison between two methods for the detection and quantification of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythensis in subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:1061-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00616.x
  21. Umeda M, Contreras A, Chen C, Bakker I, Slots J. The utility of whole saliva to detect the oral presence of periodontopathic bacteria. J Periodontol 1998;69:828-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.828

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Periodontopathic Bacterial Profiles of Different Periodontal Disease Severity Using Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110965