Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth in Korean

한국인에서 상악 전치의 시상 치근 위치에 대한 연구

  • Kong, Hyun-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 공현준 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2020.04.07
  • Accepted : 2020.04.21
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth and report the frequency of each classification in Korean for immediate implant placement. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT) images was conducted on 120 patients (60 male and 60 female) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After reorientation of the axis, cone-beam CT images were evaluated and the relationship of the sagittal root position (SRP) of the maxillary anterior teeth to its associated osseous housing was recorded. Class I, II, and III were classified respectively when the root was positioned on the labial, central, and palatal aspect of the alveolar bone. Class IV was the position that at least two thirds of the root is engaging both the labial and palatal cortical plates. Then, the angulation of the root axis and the alveolar bone axis was measured. Descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the angulation according to the root position and SRP class. Results: The frequency distribution of sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth indicated that 81.1%, 10.3%, 1.9%, and 6.7% were classified as Class I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The sagittal angulation at approximately 77.5% of central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine was < 20 degrees, but the angle at more than 42.7% of canine was ≥ 20 degrees. Within the class, the angulation was statistically significantly greater in Class I (16.19) compared to Class II (8.72) and Class III (9.93), and smaller in Class IV (3.79). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, a majority of the maxillary anterior roots were positioned close to the buccal cortical plate. However, some roots have very thin alveolar bone and sagittal angulation larger than 30 degrees. Therefore, cone-beam CT analyses of the sagittal root position and the sagittal angulation are recommended for the selection of the appropriate dental implant treatment approach.

목적: 본 연구는 한국인에서 상악 전치의 치근 위치를 시상면에서 분석하고, 분류에 따른 빈도를 보고함으로써 즉시 식립 임플란트를 위한 방사선학적 자료를 수집하기 위함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 콘빔형 전산화단층영상(cone-beam CT)을 촬영한 환자 중 연구 기준에 적합한 120명(남성 60명, 여성 60명)을 대상으로 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 축의 방향설정을 시행한 후에, 상악 전치부 치아와 치조골 사이의 관계에 대한 시상 치근 위치를 분석하였다. 치근이 치조골의 협측, 중앙, 구개측으로 위치한 경우 각각 Class I, II, III로 분류하였으며, 치근이 협측과 구개측 모두에서 피질골판에 2/3 이상 닿아있는 경우에는 Class IV로 하였다. 다음으로, 치아의 장축과 치조골의 장축 사이의 각도를 측정하였다. 기술적 분석 및 Kruskal-Wallis 분석을 시행하였으며, 치아의 위치 및 분류에 따른 시상각을 비교하였다. 결과: 상악 전치부의 시상 치근 위치에 대한 빈도분석 결과, Class I은 81.1%, Class II는 10.3%, Class III는 1.9%, 그리고 Class IV는 6.7%로 나타났다. 상악 전치부의 77.5%에서 시상각이 20도 이하로 나타났다. 그러나 견치의 경우, 42.7%에서 20도 이상의 시상각을 보였다. 분류에 따라서는 Class I (16.19)에서 Class II (8.72) 및 Class III (9.93)에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 높은 시상각을 보였으며, Class IV (3.79)에서 낮았다. 결론: 본 제한된 연구의 결과를 근거로, 상악 전치의 치근은 일반적으로 협측 치조골에 가깝게 위치하고 있으나, 일부 치아는 매우 얇은 치조골을 가지고 있으며, 30도 이상의 큰 시상각을 보였다. 따라서 적절한 치과 임플란트 치료 계획 수립을 위해 시상 치근 위치 및 시상각에 대한 cone-beam CT 분석이 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
  2. Koh RU, Rudek I, Wang HL. Immediate implant placement: positives and negatives. Implant Dent 2010;19:98-108. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181d47eaf
  3. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG. Im-mediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation. J Periodontol 2009;80:163-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080243
  4. Kois JC, Kan JY. Predictable peri-implant gingival aesthetics: surgical and prosthodontic rationales. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:691-8.
  5. Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205-9.
  6. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goene R, Hatano N, Henry P, Jackson WJ, Kawamura K, Kohler S, Renouard F, Rosenberg R, Triplett G, Werbitt M, Lithner B. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:210-6.
  7. Chan HL, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Suarez F, Monje A, Benavides E, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Incidence of implant buccal plate fenestration in the esthetic zone: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:171-7. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3397
  8. Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Patel RD, Waki T, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:873-6.
  9. Lee KY, Lee DJ. A comparative study of teeth and dental arch of Korean and Caucasian. Oral Biol Res 1993;71:1-15.
  10. Song WC, Yun KH, Koh KS. Facial flatness of Korean: using facial depth. Korean J Anat 2003;36:499-506.
  11. Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and north American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:680-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.038
  12. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara Jr JA. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72-80.
  13. Jung YH, Cho BH, Hwang JJ. Analysis of the root position of the maxillary incisors in the alveolar bone using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2017;47:181-7. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.3.181
  14. Petaibunlue S, Serichetaphongse P, Pimkhaokham A. Influence of the anterior arch shape and root position on root angulation in the maxillary esthetic area. Imaging Sci Dent 2019;49:123-30. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.123
  15. Kim JH, Lee JG, Han DH, Kim HJ. Morphometric analysis of the anterior region of the maxillary bone for immediate implant placement using micro-CT. Clin Anat 2011;24:462-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21101
  16. Bayome M, Park JH, Kook YA. New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:62-73. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.62
  17. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall - a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:125-31.
  18. Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, Lang NP. Facial alveolar bone wall width - a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:194-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12096
  19. Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, Chow LK. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:142-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.074
  20. Chung SH, Park YS, Chung SH, Shon WJ. Determination of implant position for immediate implant placement in maxillary central incisors using palatal soft tissue landmarks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:627-33. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2907
  21. Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1123-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3348