Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch

  • Nawarathne, Shan Randima (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Soo Kee (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Wickramasuriya, Samiru Sudharaka (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hong, Jun Seon (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Yu Bin (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Heo, Jung Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yi, Young-Joo (Department of Agricultural Education, Sunchon National University)
  • Received : 2020.03.05
  • Accepted : 2020.04.01
  • Published : 2020.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the growth performance between two different crossbred strains of Korean native chickens denoted as 1E and 2E with a white semibroiler (LL) from hatch to d-84 post-hatch. A total of 450 one-day-old chicks were randomly distributed into cages which included 15 replicate cages each for 1E and 2E with 9 replicate cages for LL. A three phase feeding program was used as a starter (Day 1 - 35; crude protein [CP] 20.3%; metabolizable energy [ME] 3,059 kcal·kg-1), grower (Day 36 - 56; CP 18.6%; ME 3,123 kcal·kg-1) and finisher (Day 57 - 84; CP 16.7%; ME 3,187 kcal·kg-1). The results revealed that LL had a higher (p < 0.05) BW during d-8 to d-84 compared with the other two cross breed groups. A higher (p < 0.05) ADG was observed from the LL during the entire period except from d-1 to d-14 and d-71 to d-84 when compared with 1E and 2E. Shank length did not vary (p > 0.05) between the strains, despite LL having a SL that was 2.86% higher (p < 0.05) when compared with the other strains from d-15 to d-21 post-hatch, and 1E had a SL that was 2.28% (p < 0.05) higher when compared with the other strains during the first week of the experiment.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn BK, Kim JY, Kim JS, Lee BK, Lee SY, Lee WS, Oh ST, Kim JD, Kim EJ, Hyun Y, Kim HS, Kang CW. 2009. Comparisons of the carcass characteristics of male white mini broilers, Ross broilers and Hy-Line brown chicks under the identical rearing condition. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 36:149-155. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.149
  2. Cahyadi M, Park HB, Seo DW, Jin S, Choi N, Heo KN, Kang BS, Jo C, Lee JH. 2015. Genetic parameters for growthrelated traits in Korean native chicken. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 42:285-289. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.4.285
  3. Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo CR. 2010. Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Food Science of Animal Resources 30:13-19. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.13
  4. Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Kim E, Heanjo JM, Yi YJ. 2017. Determination of growth performance of crossbred Korean native chickens for twelve weeks after hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:566-573. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20170053
  5. Cho JH, Um JS, Yu MS, Paik IK. 2007. Effect of ME and crude protein content of diet on the performance and production cost of white semibroiler chickens. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 34:53-56. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2007.34.1.053
  6. Choi NR, Seo DW, Jemaa SB, Sultana H, Heo KN, Jo C, Lee JH. 2015. Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 57:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0044-6
  7. Choo YK, Kwon HJ, Oh ST, Um JS, Kim BG, Kang CW, Lee SK, An BK. 2014. Comparison of growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Korean local chickens and silky fowl. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27:398-405. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13638
  8. Gao Y, Du ZQ, Feng CG, Deng XM, Li N, Da Y, Hu XX. 2010. Identification of quantitative trait loci for shank length and growth at different development stages in chicken. Animal Genetics 41:101-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01962.x
  9. Hong JS, Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Kim EJ, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2018. Growth performance of Korean crossbred domestic chickens for 12 weeks after post hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:733-739. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180065
  10. Jeon HJ, Choe JH, Jung YK, Kruk ZA, Lim DG, Jo CR. 2010. Comparison of the chemical composition, textural characteristics, and sensory properties of North and South Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Food Science of Animal Resources 30:171-178. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.2.171
  11. Jin S, Park HB, Seo DW, Cahyadi M, Choi NR, Heo KN, Jo C, Lee JH. 2014. Association of MC1R genotypes with shank color traits in Korean native chicken. Livestock Science 170:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.10.001
  12. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-II. Laying performance of Korean native chicken and Rhode Island red crossbreds. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 24:127-137.
  13. Kim YS, Byun MJ, Suh SW, Kim JH, Cho CY, Park SB, Ko YG, Lee JW, Choi SB. 2014. Comparison of growth performance at rearing stage between Korean native chicken and imported chickens. Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 26:568-573. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.4.568
  14. Kong HS, Oh JD, Lee JH, Jo KJ, Sang BD, Choi CH, Kim SD, Lee SJ, Yeon SH, Jeon GJ, Lee HK. 2006. Genetic variation and relationships of Korean native chickens and foreign breeds using 15 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences 19:1546-1550. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1546
  15. Lee SY, Park JY, Hyun JM, Jung S, Jo C, Nam KC. 2018. Comparative analysis of meat quality traits of new strains of native chickens for Samgyetang. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 45:175-182. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.175
  16. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs). 2014. Production and consumption trend of agricultural and livestock production. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  17. NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science). 2012. Korean feeding standard for poultry. NIAS, Jeonju, Korea. [in Korean]
  18. Park S, Ki N, Jang Y, Lee D, Moon J. 2019. Poultry industry trends and consumer analysis in Korea: Native Korean chicken and processed chicken. Agribusiness and Information Management 11:25-34. https://doi.org/10.14771/AIM.11.2.3
  19. Raach-Moujahed A, Haddad B. 2013. Performance, livability, carcass yield and meat quality of Tunisian local poultry and fast-growing genotype (Arbor Acres) fed standard diet and raised outdoor access. Journal of Animal Production Advances 3:75-85. https://doi.org/10.5455/japa.20130305122741
  20. Seo DW, Hoque MR, Choi NR, Sultana H, Park HB, Heo KN, Kang BS, Lim HT, Lee SH, Jo C, Lee JH. 2013. Discrimination of Korean native chicken lines using fifteen selected microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26:316-322. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12469
  21. Shin TK, Wickramasuriya SS, Kim E, Cho HM, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2017. Comparative study of growth performances of six different Korean native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:244-253. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170024