Acta Via Serica

Academia Via Serica (계명대학교 실크로드연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Illiberalism, Post-liberalism, Geopolitics: The EU in Central Asia

  • Received : 2020.04.15
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.07.02
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper discusses how the new EU Strategy towards Central Asia issued in May 2019 might be analyzed through the lens of the intensely debated transformations from the liberal to a post-liberal international order. The author claims that the EU's normative power is transforming from the post-Cold War predominantly liberal/ value-based approach, with democracy and human rights at its core, to a set of more technical tools and principles of good governance and effective management of public administration. The paper problematizes a nexus between the dynamics of the EU's nascent post-liberalism and the geopolitical challenges of the EU's growing engagement with illiberal regimes, focuses on direct encounters between the post-liberal EU and the illiberal elites in Central Asia, and seeks to find out the impact of these connections upon the EU's international subjectivity. In this context geopolitical dimensions of EU foreign and security policies, along with the specificity of the EU's geopolitical actorship in Central Asia, are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Balducci, Giuseppe. 2010. "The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China." East Asia 27, no. 1: 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-009-9090-3
  2. Barder, A., and D. Levine. 2012. "The World Is Too Much with Us': Reification and the Depoliticising of Via Media Constructivist IR." Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, no. 3: 585-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812442124
  3. Bekenova, Kristina, and Neil Collins. 2019. "Knowing Me, Knowing You: Media Portrayal of the EU in Kazakhstan." Europe-Asia Studies 71, no. 7: 1183-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1629393
  4. Beveridge, R. 2017. "The (Ontological) Politics in Depoliticisation Debates: Three Lenses on the Decline of the Political." Political Studies Review 15, no. 4: 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664358
  5. Blockmans Steven and Mridvika Sahajpal. 2019. "The New Eurostrategy on Central Asia: Collateral Benefit?" Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies, June 21, 2019. https://www.ceps.eu/the-new-eu-strategy-on-central-asia.
  6. Bomca. n.d. "Overview." https://www.bomca-eu.org/en/programme/overview. Accessed April 25, 2020.
  7. Boonstra, Jos. 2012. "EU Central Asia Policy: Steady as She Goes." Central Asia Policy Brief 2, August. Washington DC: Elliot School of International Affairs, George Washington University.
  8. Boonstra, Jos et al. 2018. "A New EU-Central Asia Strategy: Deepening Relationships and Generating Long-lasting Effects." Groningen: EUCAM Working Paper N. 20.
  9. Boonstra, Jos and Riccardo Panella. 2018. "Three Reasons Why the EU Matters to Central Asia." Voices of Central Asia March 13. https://voicesoncentralasia.org/three-reasons-why-the-eu-matters-to-central-asia.
  10. Borzel, Tanja and Thomas Risse. 2019. "Grand Theories of Integration and the Challenges of Comparative Regionalism." Journal of European Public Policy 26, no. 8: 1231-1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622589
  11. Bossuyt, Fabienne. 2018. "The EU's and China's Development Assistance towards Central Asia: Low versus Contested Impact." Eurasian Geography and Economics 59, no. 5-6: 606-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1581635
  12. Bossuyt, Fabienne. 2019. "New EU Strategy for Central Asia. All about Balance." The Diplomat July 13. https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/new-eu-strategy-for-centralasia-all-about-balance.
  13. Broers, Lawrence. 2019. "Stuck in post-liberal limbo? Conflict resolution in the South Caucasus." Journal of Conflict Transformation. Caucasus Edition 5 October. https://caucasusedition.net/laurence-broers-stuck-in-post-liberal-limbo-conflictresolution-in-the-south-caucasus/?fbclid=IwAR0G74M1TSzLOHQ-lGQOtoRXY98HgWKpbDlyoD45dAxDKucUpZTvRTZXsGU.
  14. Browning, Christopher. 2018. "Geostrategies, Geopolitics and Ontological Security in the Eastern Neighbourhood: The European Union and the 'New Cold War'." Political Geography 62: 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.009
  15. Bruszt, Laszlo and Julia Langbein. 2017. "Varieties of dis-embedded Liberalism. EU Integration Strategies in the Eastern peripheries of Europe." Journal of European Public Policy 24, no. 2: 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264085
  16. Budapest Process. n.d. "Budapest Process: A Silk Routes Partnership for Migration." https://www.budapestprocess.org/. Accessed April 25, 2020.
  17. Burnell, Peter. 2010. "Is there a new autocracy promotion?" Madrid: FRIDE Working Paper 96, March.
  18. CADAP. n.d. "Central Asia Drug Action Programme." cadap-eu.org. Accessed April 25, 2020.
  19. Chandler, David. 2010. "The EU and Southeastern Europe: the Rise of Postliberal Governance." Third World Quarterly 31, no. 10: 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590903557330
  20. Collier, Stephen. 2009. "Topologies of Power. Foucault's Analysis of Political Government beyond 'Governmentality'." Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 6: 78-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409347694
  21. "Connecting Europe and Asia - Building blocks for an EU Strategy." 2018. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank. Brussels: September 19.
  22. Foreign Affairs Council. 2015. "Council Conclusions on the EU Strategy for Central Asia." Brussels, June 22, 2015.
  23. Crombois, Jean. 2019. "The Eastern Partnership: Geopolitics and Policy Inertia." European View 18, no. 1: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819836562
  24. Russia and Eurasia Program. 2016. "Dealing with Illiberalism: Lessons from Central Asia." London: Chatham House, Meeting Summary.
  25. Dillon, Michael. 2015. Biopolitics of Security. A Political Analytic of Finitude. New York and London: Routledge.
  26. Dimov, Rosen. 2018. Towards a New EU Strategy for Central Asia: Innovation, Research and Technology Development as Areas of Cooperation between the EU and China in Central Asia. United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies.
  27. Donnelli, Jack. 2019. "What do we mean by realism? And how-and what-does realism explain?" In Fear and Uncertainty in Europe. A Return to Realism? Edited by : Roberto Belloni, Vincent della Sala, Paul Viotti. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Duncombe, Constance and Tim Dunne. 2018. "After liberal world order." International Affairs 94, no. 1: 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix234
  29. Eriomina, Natalia. 2018. "Sogliadkoi na Rossiyu i Kirai: Evrosoyuz prinial strategiyu dlia Tsentral'noi Azii.Evraziya-Ekspert." Accessed November 27, 2019. https://eurasia.expert/s-oglyadkoy-na-rossiyu-i-kitay-evrosoyuz-prinyal-strategiyu-dlyatsentralnoy-azii.
  30. Ettlinger, Nancy. 2011. "Governmentality as Epistemology." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, no. 3: 537-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.544962
  31. European Parliament. 2016. Parliament Resolution of 13 April 2016 on Implementation and Review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy (2015/2220(INI))
  32. EU Rule of Law Initiative for Central Asia. 2007. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eu_rule_of_law_initiative_for_central_asia_0.pdf.
  33. Fairclough, Isabela and Fairclough, Norman. 2013. "Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective." Political Studies Review 11: 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12025
  34. Finlayson, Alan. "Critique and Political Argumentation." 2013. Political Studies Review 11: 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12023
  35. Garsten, Ch. and K. Jacobsson. 2013. "Post-Political Regulation: Soft Power and Post-Political Visions in Global Governance." Critical Sociology 39, no. 3: 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511413942
  36. Global Partners for Global Changes: Asia-Europe Meeting, ASEM 12 - Brussels. 2018. Chair's Statement.
  37. Gugushvili, D. 2017. "Lessons from Georgia's Neoliberal Experiment: A Rising Tide does not Necessarily Lift all Boats." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.11.001
  38. Hay, Colin. 2013. "Political Discourse Analysis: The Dangers of Methodological Absolutism." Political Studies Review 11: 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12026
  39. Hindess, Barry. 2010. "Liberalism: Rationality of Government and Vision of History." Social Identities 16, no. 5: 669-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2010.509571
  40. Holland, Eugene. 1991. "Deterritorializing Deterritorialization From the Anti-Oedipus to A Thousand Plateaus" SubStance Issue 66, Vol. 20, No. 3: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685179
  41. Horky-Hluchan, Ondrej and Petr Kratochvil. 2014. "Nothing Is Imposed in This Policy!": The Construction and Constriction of the European Neighborhood." Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 39, no. 9: 252-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375415574453
  42. "How 'Central' is Central Asia in the EU-Asia connectivity strategy?" 2019. EUCAM Watch, issue 20, January.
  43. Humbert, Clemence and Jonathan Joseph. 2019. "Introduction: the Politics of Resilience: Problematising Current Approaches." Resilience 7, no. 3: 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2019.1613738
  44. Jahn, Beate. 2018. "Liberal Internationalism: Historical trajectory and Current Prospects." International Affairs 94, no. 1: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix231
  45. Jonas, Andrew. 2012. "Region and Place: Regionalism in Question." Progress in Human Geography 36, no. 2: 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394118
  46. Joseph, Jonathan. 2016. "Governing through Failure and Denial: The New Resilience Agenda." Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44, no. 3: 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816638166
  47. Juncos, Ana. 2017. "Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: a Pragmatist Turn?" European Security 26, no. 1: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809
  48. Ikenberry, John. 2018. "The End of Liberal International Order?" International Affairs 94, no. 1: 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
  49. Kavalski, Emilian. 2007. "Partnership or Rivalry between the EU, China and India in Central Asia: The Normative Power of Regional Actors with Global Aspirations." European Law Journal 13, no. 6: 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00393.x
  50. Koch, Natalie. 2019. "Post-triumphalist Geopolitics: Liberal Selves, Authoritarian Others." ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 18, no. 4: 909-924.
  51. Koch, Natalie and Neha Vora. 2019. "Laboratories of Liberalism: American Higher Education in the Arabian Peninsula and the Discursive Production of Authoritarianism." Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09382-5.
  52. Koh, Sharon and Andrei Kwok. 2017. "Regional Integration in Central Asia: Rediscovering the Silk Road." Tourism Management Perspectives 22: 64-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.01.002
  53. Korosteleva, Elena and Fabienne Bossuyt. 2019. "The EU and Central Asia: New Opportunities or 'the same old song'?" Dahrendorf Forum: Debating Europe, June 18. https://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/the-eu-and-central-asia-new-opportunities-or-the-same-old-song.
  54. Kotthaus, Elisabeth. 2015. "External Democracy Promotion and Protection: the EU Approach." Global Policy 6, no. 1: 46-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12227
  55. Larrinaga, Miguel and Marc Doucet. 2008. "Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security." Security Dialogue 39, no. 5: 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608096148
  56. Laumulin, Murat. "The EU's Incomplete Strategy for Central Asia." Carnegie Europe, December 3, 2019. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/80470.
  57. Lavenex, Sandra & Frank Schimmelfennig. 2011. "EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance?" Democratization 18, no. 4: 885-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.584730
  58. Leconte, Cecile. 2015. "From Pathology to Mainstream Phenomenon: Reviewing the Euroscepticism Debate in Research and Theory." International Political Science Review 36, no. 3: 250- 263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115576236
  59. Lee, Michael. 2019. "Populism or Embedded Plutocracy? The Emerging World Order." Survival 61, no. 2: 53-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589078
  60. Lemm, Vanessa and Miguel Vatter (Eds.). 2014. The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism. New York: Fordham University Press.
  61. Lenz, Tobias. 2013. "EU Normative Power and Regionalism: Ideational Diffusion and its Limits." Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 2: 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485539
  62. Lottholz, Phillip. 2019. "Towards a Post-liberal Research Agenda in Eurasia." Open Democracy, February 27. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/political-change-in-post-socialist-eurasia.
  63. McFalls, Laurence and Mariella Pandolfi. 2012. "Post-liberalism." Academic Foresights 5, July-September. http://www.academic-foresights.com/Post-Liberalism.pdf.
  64. Mabon, Simon. 2019. "The World is a Garden: Nomos, Sovereignty, and the (contested) Ordering of Life." Review of International Studies. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000172.
  65. Meister, Stefan. 2019. Eastern Partnership 2.0 - Upgrading the ambitions and impact on the neighborhood. Tbilisi: Heinrich Boll Stiftung, September 13. https://ge.boell.org/en/2019/09/13/eastern-partnership-20-upgrading-ambitions-and-impact-neighborhood?fbclid=IwAR3RehmrqvgrCtBHtG8tvyIDIfv11uSHTi5cUM8-xOVopPNgRkCLdapf5jw.
  66. Merlingen, Michael. 2007. "Everything Is Dangerous: a Critique of 'Normative Power Europe.'" Security Dialogue 38, no. 4: 435-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607084995
  67. Patnaik, Ajai. 2019. "Regionalism and Regional Cooperation in Central Asia." International Studies 56, no. 2-3: 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881719852567
  68. Peyrouse, Sebastien. 2017. "A Donor without Influence: the European Union in Central Asia." PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 478, June. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/donor-without-influence-european-union-central-asia.
  69. Prague Process. n.d. "What Is the Prague Process?". https://www.pragueprocess.eu/en/about. Accessed April 25, 2020.
  70. Putz, Catherine. 2019. "The European Union's (Not So) New Central Asia Strategy." The Diplomat, May 16. https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/the-european-unionsnot-so-new-central-asia-strategy.
  71. Remington, Thomas. 2018. "Institutional Change in Authoritarian Regimes." Problems of Post-Communism, DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2018.1450154.
  72. Russo, Alexandra and Edward Stoddard. 2018. "Why do Authoritarian Leaders do Regionalism? Ontological Security and Eurasian Regional Cooperation." The International Spectator 53, no. 3: 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1488404
  73. Savage, Glenn. 2019. "What is Policy Assemblage?" Territory, Politics, Governance. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760.
  74. Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton. 2015. "What Is Discourse Analysis?" In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  75. "Shared Vision, Common Action. A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy." Brussels, June 2016.
  76. Shyrokykh, Karina. 2019. "Policy-Specific Effects of Transgovernmental Cooperation: a Statistical Assessment Across the EU's Post-Soviet Neighbours." Journal of European Public Policy 26, no. 1: 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1393837
  77. Smith, Michael & Richard Youngs. 2018. "The EU and the Global Order: Contingent Liberalism." The International Spectator 53, no. 1: 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1409024
  78. Somzhurek, B. Zh.; A.M. Yessengaliyeva, Zh. M. Medeubayeva, B.K. Makangali. 2018. "Central Asia and Regional Security." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51: 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.04.005
  79. Szewczyk, Bart. 2019. "Europe and the Liberal Order." Survival 61, no. 2: 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589077
  80. Tatum, Dillon Stone. 2018. "Discourse, Genealogy and Methods of Text Selection in International Relations." Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31, no. 3-4: 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1518971
  81. "The EU and Central Asia: Strategy for a New Partnership." 2007. Brussels: Council of the European Union. May 31. The Permanent Representatives Committee.
  82. Tokhvadze, Nikoloz. 2019. "The Eastern Partnership at Ten: a Major Flop?" Berlin: ZOIS Spotlight 34 / 2017, September 18. https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/zois-spotlight/the-eastern-partnership-at-ten-a-major-flop/?fbclid=IwAR2tiOmxl4MAAqaHK8Y2DJDropvJmHq_jictsdW6Gx68-9ub3rQcdpBulZE.
  83. Vanderhill, Rachel. 2017. "Active Resistance to Democratic Diffusion." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50: 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.01.003
  84. Wagner, Wolfgang. 2017. "Liberal Power Europe." Journal of Common Market Studies 55, no. 6: 1398-1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12572
  85. Warkotsch, Alexander. 2008. "Normative Suasion and Political Change in Central Asia." Caucasian Review of International Affairs 2, no. 4: 240-249.
  86. Wood, M. 2016. "Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics: Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda." Political Studies Review 14, no. 4: 521-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12074
  87. Wragel, Claes Tangh. 2019. "Biopolitics of Hope and Security: Governing the Future through US Counterterrorism Communications." Globalizations. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2018.1558631.
  88. Youngs, Richard. 2017. "Is 'Hybrid Geopolitics' the Next EU Foreign Policy Doctrine?" London School of Economics and Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/06/19/is-hybrid-geopolitics-the-next-eu-foreign-policy-doctrine.