한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제21권6호
  • /
  • Pages.275-285
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학교에 대한 학생인식의 종단적 변화 연구 : 잠재성장모형의 접근

A Latent Growth Modeling of the Longitudinal Changes of Students' Perception about Schools

  • 김수정 (한양대학교 한국교육문제연구소) ;
  • 이윤수 (한양대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 송미령 (한양대학교 한국교육문제연구소) ;
  • 송지훈 (한양대학교 교육공학과)
  • Kim, Soo Jung (Institute for Korean Education Research, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Yunsoo (Department of Educational Technology, Hanyang University) ;
  • Song, Miryoung (Institute for Korean Education Research, Hanyang University) ;
  • Song, Ji Hoon (Department of Educational Technology, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.09
  • 심사 : 2020.06.05
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 시간이 지남에 따라 학교에 대한 학생인식의 변화를 추적하고, 교육복지우선지원사업 참여 여부가 그 변화를 어떻게 설명하는지, 변화의 결과가 학생들의 학습몰입, 자신감, 교우관계에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 교육복지정책중점연구소에서 2015년부터 2017년까지 전국 총 103개 학교(초등학교 51개, 중학교 52개)로부터 수집한 자료를 활용하였다. 1차년도의 표본 수는 총 820명, 2차년도는 911명, 3차년도는 837명이었다. 본 연구는 무조건 성장 모형(unconditional growth model)과 조건 성장 모형(conditional growth model)의 두 단계를 거치는 잠재성장모형을 적용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과 첫째, 교육복지우선지원사업 참여 학생들의 학교에 대한 인식은 시간이 지남에 따라 성장선을 보여주었다. 둘째, 학교에 대한 학생인식의 개선은 학생들의 학습몰입, 자신감, 교우관계에 모두 정(+)적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 향후, 교육복지우선지원사업의 효과성을 극대화하기 위해서는 학교에 대한 인식 개선을 목적으로 하는 프로그램을 교사 주도로 교육복지우선지원사업 대상 여부에 관계없이 모든 학생에게 제공하며, 집중지원이 필요한 학생에 대해서는 교육복지사 중심으로 맞춤형 통합지원 프로그램을 제공하는 것이 바람직하다는 제언을 제시하였다.

This study aimed to track changes in students' perception about schools over time, to analyze how participation in the Education Welfare Priority Support Project(hereafter "the Project") explains the changes, and to determine how the results of changes affect students' learning engagement, self-confidence, and peer relationship. Data were collected from 103 schools nation-wide(51 elementary and 52 middle schools) from 2015, 2016 and 2017 from 820, 911, and 837 students, respectively. The data were analyzed by applying a latent growth model with two stages: unconditional and conditional. The findings are that first, the perception about schools by the students who participated in the Project increased over time; and second, that the improvement of students' perception of schools has a positive influence on their learning engagement, self-confidence, and peer relationship. In the future, it was suggested that programs aimed at improving positive perception about schools should be provided to all students led by teachers, and a customized integrated support program should be arranged to students in need of intensive support by the educational welfare specialists.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y. J. Chun, S. T. Kim, J. Y. Kim, "Economic effects of paradigm change in social welfare policy -Universal social welfare vs. Targeted social welfare-", The Korean Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.61, No.2, pp.69-111, Jun. 2013.
  2. S. Kim, S. Kim, S. Kang, "Welfare policy preference in south korea: Growth versus redistribution and targeting versus universalism", Korean Social Security Studies, Vol.30, No.2, pp.67-90, May. 2014.
  3. Ministry of Education, The significance and direction of the Supportive Project for the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment(SPPREWI), Regional Education Council, 2003.
  4. J. H. Song, Y. M. Jung, S. J. Kim, H. J. Im, T. W. Rho, J. K. Lee, Statistics of the Educational Welfare Priority Project in 2018, Seoul: Central Educational Welfare Research Support Center, 2018.
  5. S. J. Kim, "A study on the effect of the Education-Welfare Investment Priority Area Project", Korea Youth Research Association, Vol.19, No.6, pp.179-201, Jun. 2012.
  6. B. Lee, H. Moon, J. Kim, "The effect of the Supportive Project for the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment(SPPREWI) on childrens school achievement", Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, Vol.45, pp.161-190, Mar. 2014.
  7. B. Ryu, J. Kim, H. Song, J. Kim, "The effects of Education Welfare Priority Program on enhancing self-esteem and mitigating depression and anxiety in students", Asian Journal of Education, Vol.14, No.3, pp.59-83, Sep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2013.14.3.003
  8. Y. J. Jung, S. G. Kim, "Factors affecting stigma of education & welfare in practice", Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, Vol.29, pp.97-123. Sep. 2009.
  9. B. Lee, Y. Kim, K. Kim, "A study on the effects of the Education-Welfare Investment Priority Area Project : A longitudinal comparison study between participating and non-participating students", Studies on Korean Youth, Vol.19, No.3, pp.169-195, Aug. 2008.
  10. N. Lee, N. Koo, "An exploration of the cognitive, social and emotional development trends of low-income students according to their participation in Educational Welfare Priority Project", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol.17, pp.91-110, Jul. 2017.
  11. Y. Jung, M. Um, "Effect of the Spportive Project for the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment [SPPREWI] on school children's psychosocial and cognitive adjustment", Korean Journal of Social Welfare, Vol.61, No.4, pp.5-33, Nov. 2009. https://doi.org/10.20970/KASW.2009.61.4.001
  12. L. Bickman, "The functions of program theory", New Directions for Evaluation, Vol.33, pp.5-18, Nov. 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1443
  13. C. Lee, C. Y. Jyung, Y. J. Choi, Y. W. Moon, "Performance analysis of National Human Resource Development Consortium Project using logic model", The Journal of Vocational Education Research, Vol.31, No.1, pp.195-216, Mar. 2012.
  14. H. Jang, Development of Korean longitudinal research model for the performance analysis of the Educational Welfare Priority Project, Seoul: Institute for Education and Welfare Policy, 2015.
  15. H. Kim, D. Jang, "A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the Educational Welfare Priority Project", Journal of School Social Work, Vol.38, pp.173-199, Jun, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20993/jSSW.38.8
  16. S. J. Kye, J. W. Lee, M. C. Kim, M. S. Park, E. Y. Yoo, "A study on the adolescents' school life and their level of satisfaction", Family and Environment Research, Vol.39, No.2, pp.57-128, Feb. 2001.
  17. J. Epstein, J. M. McPartland, "The concept and measurement of the quality of school life", American Educational Research Journal, Vol.13, pp.15-30, Jan. 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312013001015
  18. J. A. Baker, "The social context of school satisfaction among urban, low-income African-American students", School Psychology Quarterly, Vol.13, pp.25-44, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088970
  19. A. L. D. King, S. Huebner, S. M. Suldo, R. F. Valois, "An ecological view of school satisfaction in adolescence: Linkages between social support and behavior problems", Applied Research in Quality of Life, Vol.1, No.3-4, pp.279-295, Apr. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-007-9021-7
  20. G. M. Elmore, E. S. Huebner, "Adolescents' satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior", Psychology in the Schools, Vol.47, No.6, pp.525-537, May. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20488
  21. M. Benjamin, A. Hollings, "Student satisfaction: Test of an ecological model", Journal of College Student Development, Vol.38, No.3, pp.213-28, May. 1997.
  22. K. J. Zullig, E. S. Huebner, J. M. Patton, "Relationships among school climate domains and school satisfaction", Psychology in the Schools, Vol.48, No.2, pp.133-145, Dec. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20532
  23. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
  24. S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, C. Wylie, ed., Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  25. J. Reeve, "How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.105, No.3, pp.579-595, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
  26. J. U. Kim, H. E. Kim, "The relationship of self-efficacy and stress to children's learning flow and academic achievement", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol.12, No.1, pp.97-118, Mar. 2012.
  27. I. Seok, "Analyzing characters of the learning flow", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.24, No.1, pp.187-212, Mar. 2008.
  28. K. Hong, "A study on relationships between instructional variables and learning-flow", Korean Journal of Thinking Development, Vol.5, No.1, pp.19-44, Jun. 2009.
  29. M. Bong, E. M. Skaalvik, "Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?", Educational Psychology Review, Vol.15, No.1, pp.1-40, Mar. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
  30. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, Vol.84, pp.191-215, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  31. A. Bandura, Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
  32. P. Sander, L. Sanders, "Understanding academic confidence", Psychology Teaching Review, Vol.12, No.1, pp.29-42, 2006.
  33. Young Ju Jo, Jong Hee Le, Na Yeon Yoo, "Difference analysis of gender among self-confidence, positive attitude, instructional activities, and achievement in mathematics for middle school student", Secondary Education Research, Vol.60, No.4, pp.963-986, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2012.60.4.963
  34. A. Kim, "Self-Efficacy and academic motivation", The Korea Journal of Education Methodology, Vol.16, pp.1-38, Jan. 2004. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2004.16.1.1
  35. R. Sharabany, R. Gershoni, J. E. Hofman, "Girl friend, boy friend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship", Developmental Psychology, Vol.17, pp.800-808, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.800
  36. S. Harter, Self and Identity Development, in Shirley S. Feldman & Glen R. Elliott ed., At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent, pp.352-387. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
  37. A. P. Mannarino, J. A. Cohen, S. R. Berman, "The children's attributions and perceptions scale: A new measure of sexual abuse-related factors", Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, Vol.23, No.2, pp.204-211, Jun. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2302_9
  38. W. W. Hartup, Peer Relations, in Paul. H. Mussen & E. Marvis Hetherington ed., Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol.4, Socialization, Personality, and Social Development, pp.103-196. New York: Wiley, 1983.
  39. H. M. Lee, Y. M. Kim, "The mediating effects of emotional intelligence and social support on the relationship between rejection sensitivity and friendship", The Korean Journal Child Education, Vol.24, No.4, pp.253-271, Nov. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17643/KJCE.2015.24.4.14
  40. D. E. Szwedo, A. Y. Mikami, J. P. Allen, "Qualities of peer relations on social networking websites: Predictions from negative mother-teen interactions", Journal of Research on Adolescence, Vol.21, No.3, pp.595-607, Sep. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00692.x
  41. J. S. Lee, Y. G. Lee, "A path analysis of parent's socioeconomic position Influencing on children's academic achievement", Korean Journal of Family Welfare, Vol.26, pp.159-191, Aug. 2009.
  42. Y. Song, H. Lee, "The determinants of friendship among adolescent in Korea", The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, Vol.28, No.1, pp.91-112, 2011. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2011.28.1.91
  43. M. S. Oh, "Influences of teacher and peer relationships on school adjustment of middle school students -Focusing on mediating effects of the sense of community-", Journal of Regional Studies, Vol.21, No.3, pp.111-130, Sep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.22921/JRS.2013.21.3.006
  44. T. E. Duncan, S. C. Duncan, "Modeling the processes of development via latent variable growth curve methodology", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol.2, No.3, pp.187-213, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540009
  45. Y. Lee, S. J. Eissenstat, "A longitudinal examination of the causes and effects of burnout based on the job demands-resources model", International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, Vol.18, No.3, pp.337-354, Oct. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9364-7
  46. M. W. Browne, R. Cudeck, Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in Kenneth A. Bollen & John S. Long ed., Testing Structural Equation Models, pp.136-162, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1993.
  47. L. T. Hu, P. M. Bentler, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol.6, No.1, pp.1-55. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  48. R. C. MacCallum, K. F. Widaman, S. Zhang, S. Hong, "Sample size in factor analysis", Psychological Methods, Vol.4, No.1, pp.84-99, Mar. 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
  49. Y. Lee, M. Choi, D. Cho, K. Lee, "The effect of organizational learning capacity on innovative behavior", Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, Vol.21, No.2, pp.121-141, Jun. 2019.
  50. Y. Lee, Y, Lee. D. Cho, "The effect of job crafting on objective and subjective job performance: Focusing on the multi-group analysis between millennial and old generation sales managers", Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, Vol.22, No.1, pp.145-162, Mar. 2020. https://doi.org/10.46260/KSLP.22.1.6
  51. S. G. West, J. F. Finch, P. J. Curran, Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies, In Rick H. Hoyle ed., Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, pp.56- 75, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.