DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

금속 밀링과 직접 금속 레이저 소결 방식으로 제작한 3본 코발트-크롬 구조물의 변연 및 내부 적합도 비교 평가

Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit of three-unit Co-Cr frameworks fabricated by metal milling and direct metal laser sintering methods

  • 안재석 (광주보건대학 치기공학과) ;
  • 이정환 (광주보건대학 치기공학과)
  • Ahn, Jae-Seok (Department of Dental Lab Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hwan (Department of Dental Lab Technology, Gwangju Health University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.16
  • 심사 : 2020.06.18
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30

초록

Purpose: This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of three-unit Co-Cr frameworks fabricated by computer-aided metal milling and direct metal laser sintering(DMLS) systems in comparison to conventional casting method. Methods: Three-unit Co-Cr frameworks were fabricated by conventional wax up with casting(CWC), computer-aided metal milling(MM) and direct metal laser sintering(DMLS)(n=10 each). The marginal and internal fit of specimens were examined using a light-body silicone impression material. The thickness of light-body silicone was measured at eight reference points each, divided in the mesio distal and bucco lingual directions. All measurements were conducted by a stereomicroscope. Digital photos were taken at 150× magnification and then analyzed using a measurement software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni correction were used for analyzing the results. Results: The mean(SD) is ㎛ for fabrication methods, the mean marginal fit were recorded respectively, DMLS 39(27), followed by CWC 63(38), MM 220(128). and the mean internal fit CWC 95(47), DMLS 116(49), MM 210(152). In addition, the largest gap was found in the occlusal surface area among the internal measurement areas of all groups. Conclusion: As a result, the direct metal laser sintering method showed better marginal and internal fit than the metal milling method. The marginal and internal fit were statistically different according to the three fabrication methods(p<0.001). Except the MM group, the marginal fit of the CWC and DMLS groups was below the clinical standard of 120 ㎛. Based on the results of this study, it can be applied to clinical use in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil, 37, 866-876, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02113.x
  2. Bhaskaran E, Azhagarasan NS, Miglani S, Ilango T, Krishna GP, Gajapathi B. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Gap of Co-Cr Copings Fabricated from Conventional Wax Pattern, 3D Printed Resin Pattern and DMLS Tech: An In Vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 13, 189-195, 2013.
  3. Castillo-de-Oyague R, Sanchez-Turrion A, Lopez-Lozano JF, Albaladejo A, Torres-Lagares D, Montero J, Suarez-Garcia MJ. Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 17, 610-617, 2012.
  4. Huh JB, Kim US, Kim HY, Kim JE, Lee JY, Kim YS, Jeon YC, Shin SW. Marginal and internal fitness of three-unit zirconia cores fabricated using several CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 49, 236-244, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.236
  5. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131, 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  6. Milan FM, Consani S, Correr Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Sousa-Neto MD, Knowles JC. Influence of casting methods on marginal and internal discrepancies of complete cast crowns. Braz Dent J, 15, 127-132, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402004000200008
  7. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand, 51, 201-206, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  8. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all ceramic crown using ccd camera. J Korean Acad Prosthdont, 36, 273-292, 1998.
  9. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and Reliability of Methods to Measure marginal Adaptation of Crowns and FDPs: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont, 22, 419-428, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006
  10. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative invitro study. Dent Mater, 27, 356-363, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
  11. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater, 24, 1311-1315, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.011
  12. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, 25-32, 2008.
  13. Rekow D, Thompson VP. Near-surface damage a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing. Inst Mech Eng H, 219(4), 233-43, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441105X9363
  14. Robert D. 3D printing techniques for dental products. https://3dprint.com/Comment filed under dental, 2012.
  15. Tara MA, Eschbach S, Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with laser-sintering technology. Int J Prosthodont, 24, 46-48, 2011.
  16. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil M, Brantley W. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: lasersintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 102, 253-259, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  17. Viennot S, Dalard F, Malquarti G, Grosgogeat B. Combination fixed and removal prostheses using a CoCr alloy: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 96, 100-103, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.013
  18. Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi A. Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional wax up Techniques. J Dent, 14, 118-129, 2013.
  19. Witkowski S. CAD/CAM in Dental Technology. Quintessence of Dental Technol, 28, 169-184, 2005.
  20. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont, 7, 209-215, 1994.