DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Delayed Oxygen Evolution in Anodic Polarization on the Passive Film Characteristic and Localized Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys

타이타늄 합금에서 산소발생전위 지연이 부동태 피막 특성과 국부부식 저항성에 미치는 영향

  • Oh, Yu Soo (School of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Seo, Dong-Il (School of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Bong (School of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University)
  • 오유수 (국민대학교 공과대학 신소재공학부) ;
  • 서동일 (국민대학교 공과대학 신소재공학부) ;
  • 이재봉 (국민대학교 공과대학 신소재공학부)
  • Received : 2020.04.23
  • Accepted : 2020.05.14
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate delayed oxygen evolution and localized corrosion resistance of titanium alloys by performing potentiodynamic polarization, potentiostatic polarization, and Mott-Schottky measurements. Delayed oxygen evolution was compared among titanium alloys, 316 stainless steel, and platinum. Difference in delayed oxygen evolution between titanium alloys and other metals was attributed to specific surface characteristic of each metal. Delayed oxygen evolution of titanium alloys resulted from the predominant process of ionic conduction over electronic conduction. The effect of oxygen evolution on localized corrosion of titanium alloys was investigated using electrochemical critical localized corrosion temperature (E-CLCT) technique. Mott-Schottky measurement was performed to clarify the difference in film properties between titanium alloys and stainless steels. Titanium alloys were found to have much lower donor density than stainless steels by 1/28. These results indicate that delayed oxygen evolution has little influence on the concreteness of passive film and the resistance to localized corrosion of titanium alloys.

Keywords

References

  1. C. Leyens and M. Peters, Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications, p. 333, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602119.ch13
  2. A. Cigada, M. Cabrini and P. Pedeferri, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 3, 408 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00701236
  3. B. Roh and D. D. Macdonald, J. Solid State Electrochem., 23, 1967 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-019-04254-0
  4. W. Yang and W. Hwang, Corros. Sci. Tech., 12, 203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14773/cst.2013.12.5.203
  5. A. Mazzarolo, M. Curioni, A. Vicenzo, P. Skeldon, and G. E. Thomson, Electrochim. Acta, 75, 288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.114
  6. D.-I, Seo and J.-B. Lee, Corros. Sci. Tech., 17, 129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14773/cst.2018.17.3.129
  7. D.-I. Seo and J.-B. Lee, Corros. Sci. Tech., 18, 110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14773/cst.2019.18.3.110
  8. D.-I. Seo and J.-B. Lee, J. Electrochem. Soc., 166, C428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0571913jes
  9. D. A. Jones, Principles and prevention of corrosion, p. 119, Macmillan Pub. Co., New York (1992).
  10. T. J. Horn and O. L. Harrysson, Sci. Prog., 95, 255 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13420984463047
  11. ISO/FDIS 22910: 2020, Corrosion of metals and alloys-measurement of the electrochemical critical localized corrosion temperature (E-CLCT) for Ti alloys fabricated via the additive manufacturing method (2020). https://www.iso.org/standard/74150.html
  12. J. -B. Lee, D. -I. Seo, and H. -Y. Chang, Met. Mater. Inter., 26, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00484-z
  13. J.-B. Lee and S.-I. Yoon, Mater. Chem. Phys., 122, 194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.033
  14. N. Ibris, Russ. J. electrochem., 39, 430 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023330610633
  15. A. M. Schmidt, D. S. Azambuja, and E. M. Martini, Corros. Sci., 48, 2901 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.10.013
  16. D. D. Macdonald, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 3434 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2069096