DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconstruction of microstomia considering their functional status

  • Ki, Sae Hwi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Jo, Gang Yeon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Jinmyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Matthew Seung Suk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inha University Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.05.29
  • Accepted : 2020.06.19
  • Published : 2020.06.20

Abstract

Background: Microstomia is defined as a condition with a small sized-mouth that results in functional impairment such as difficulty with food intake, pronunciation, and poor oral hygiene and cosmetic problems. Several treatment methods for microstomia have been proposed. None of them are universally applicable. This study aims at analyzing the cases treated at our institution critically reviewing the pertinent literature. Methods: The medical records of all microstomia patients treated in our hospital from November 2015 to April 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, all patients who received surgical treatment for microstomia were included in the study and analyzed for etiology, chief complaint, surgical method, and outcomes. The functional outcomes of mouth opening and intercommissure distance before and after the surgery were evaluated. The cosmetic results were assessed according to the patients' satisfaction. Results: Five patients with microstomia were corrected. Two cases were due to scar contracture after chemical burn, two cases derived from repeated excision of skin cancer, and one patient suffered sequela of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The following surgical methods were applied: one full-thickness skin graft on the buccal mucosa, three buccal mucosal advancement flaps after triangular excision of the mouth corner, and one local buccal mucosal flap. Mouth opening was increased by 6.0 mm, and the intercommissure distance improved by 7.2 mm on average. Follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 5-14 months). Cosmetic assessment was as follows: two patients found the results excellent, three judged it as good. Conclusion: Microstomia has several causes. In order to achieve optimal functional recovery and aesthetic improvement it is important to precisely evaluate the etiologic factors and the severity of the impairment and to carefully choose the appropriate surgical method.

Keywords

References

  1. Kazanjian VH, Roopenian A. The treatment of lip deformities resulting from electric burns. Am J Surg 1954;88:884-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(54)90444-4
  2. Egeland B, More S, Buchman SR, Cederna PS. Management of difficult pediatric facial burns: reconstruction of burn-related lower eyelid ectropion and perioral contractures. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:960-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318175f451
  3. Cakan M, Aktay Ayaz N, Keskindemirci G, Onan SH, Akoz Saydam F. A case of Kawasaki disease with severe lip and oral mucosa involvement complicated with microstomia and corrected with surgery. Arch Rheumatol 2017;33:238-40.
  4. Zweifel CJ, Guggenheim M, Jandali AR, Altintas MA, Kunzi W, Giovanoli P. Management of microstomia in adult burn patients revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:e351-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.10.026
  5. Mordjikian E. Severe microstomia due to burn by caustic soda. Burns 2002;28:802-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(02)00209-7
  6. Lehocky B. Anthropometry and cephalometric facial analysis. In: Mathes SI, editor. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006. p. 1-30.
  7. Conine TA, Carlow DL, Stevenson-Moore P. Dynamic orthoses for the management of microstomia. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987;24:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.1987.07.0043
  8. Holt GR, Parel S, Richardson DS, Kittle PE. The prosthetic management of oral commissure burns. Laryngoscope 1982;92:407-11.
  9. Converse JM. Techniques for the repair of defects of the lips and cheeks. In: Converse JM, editor. Reconstructive plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977. p. 1544-94.
  10. Grishkevich VM. Post-burn microstomia: anatomy and elimination with trapeze-flap plasty. Burns 2011;37:484-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2010.09.003
  11. Monteiro DI, Horta R, Silva P, Amarante JM, Silva A. A simple "fishtail flap" for surgical correction of microstomia. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:2292-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318232a5e6
  12. Donelan MB. Reconstruction of electrical burns of the oral commissure with a ventral tongue flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95:1155-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199506000-00003
  13. Ayhan M, Aytug Z, Deren O, Karantinaci B, Gorgu M. An alternative treatment for postburn microstomia treatment: composite auricular lobule graft for oral comissure reconstruction. Burns 2006;32:380-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.10.011