참고문헌
- T. Symons & T. Bass. (2017). Me, my data and I: The future of the personal data economy. London: DECODE, Nesta. Retrieved October 22, 2018 from https://www.decodeproject.eu/publications/me-my-data-and-ithe-future-personal-data-economy.
- M. Micheli, M. Blakemore, M. Ponti & M. Craglia. (2018). The Governance of Data in a Digitally Transformed European Society. Second Workshop of the DigiTranScope Project, European Commission, 2018,
- H. Y. Kang & H. Y. Kwon. (2019). Policy Suggestions on Personal Data Utilization by Analyzing Domestic and International De-identification Policy. Convergence Security Journal, 19(1), 41-48.
- H. Ko & Y. Im. (2019). Data Ownership, Pakyoungsa : Seoul.
- D. H. Guston. (1996). Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy. Science and Public Policy, 23(4), 229-240. DOI: 10.1093/spp/23.4.229
- D. Braun & D. H. Guston. (2003). Principal-agent theory and research policy: an introduction. Science and public policy, 30(5), 302-308. DOI: 10.3152/147154303781780290
- R. Gauld. (2007). Principal-agent theory and organisational change: lessons from New Zealand health information management. Policy Studies, 28(1), 17-34. DOI: 10.1080/01442870601121395
- T. P. Hagen. (1997). Agenda setting power and moral hazard in principal-agent relationships: Evidence from hospital budgeting in Norway. European journal of political research, 31(3), 287-314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997
- Ministry of Science and ICT (2019), Key Findings from 2018 Data Industry Survey.
- Chunlei Tang (2016), The Data Industry: The Business and Economics of Information and Big Data, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
- Korea Internet & Security Agency (2018.03), Report on overseas private information protection trends.
- Korea Data Agency (2018) White paper on data industry.
- K. J. Arrow. (1985), "The economics of agency," In Pratt, J. W. & R. J. Zeckhauser (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 37-51.
- Gerber, Brian. J & Teske. Paul (2000). Regulatory policymaking in the american states: A review of theories and evidence. Political Research Quarterly, 53(4), 849-886. DOI: 10.1177/106591290005300408
- Hwang. (2005), Principal-Agent Relations in the Policy Process: Reinterpreting the Formation Process of the "Drug Prescription & Dispensing Separation" Policy. Korea Policy Review 14(4), 29-57.
- Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H. and Xue, Y. "Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective," MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 2007, pp. 105-136. DOI: 10.2307/25148783
- S, Lee. (2017), Contents and implications of guidelines for online customized advertisements, KISO Journal.
- Lee, I. (2017) Study on Development Methods of Personal Information Protection in Korea. Personal Information Protection Commission Research Report.
- Park, N. (2017). A Legal Analysis of the Profiling Provisions in the EU GDPR.
- European Union (2016), REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
- Google and Facebook advertisements have it too easy, targeted by the EU(2017.01.12.) JoongAng Ilbo.
- Jung, I. et al. (2019), The Analysis of Industrial Ripple Effect of GDPR and Issues in Innovative Technologies, STEPI Insight
- 3 in 10 World Citizens Are on Facebook"(2019.04.25.), Statista.
- 10 years of Facebook... 10 services that are now no longer in service (2014.02.03), ZDNet Korea.
- Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005), Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy, 3(1), 26-33. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2005.22
- Rosenblum, D. (2007), What anyone can know: The privacy risks of social networking sites. IEEE Security & Privacy, 5(3), 40-49 DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2007.75
- Govani, T., & Pashley, H. (2007), Student awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook,
- Barth, S., & De Jong, M. D. (2017), The privacy paradox-Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior-A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
- J. Kim et al. (2018), Study on information privacy paradox, 2018 NAVER Privacy White Paper.
- Google Fined Record $2.7 Billion in E.U. Antitrust Ruling(2017.06.29.), The New York Times.
- E.U. Fines Google $5.1 Billion in Android Antitrust Case (2018.07.18), The New York Times.
- 'Domestic Agent system to come online' Survey of value-added telecommunications service providers is reverse discrimination for domestic firms (2019.09.22), Law Times.