The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of three-dimensional digital technique with two-dimensional replica method for measuring marginal and internal fit of full coverage restorations

  • Hasanzade, Mahya (Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Koulivand, Soudabeh (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Moslemian, Naeime (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Alikhasi, Marzieh (Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2020.01.22
  • Accepted : 2020.04.29
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study compared digital (reference point matching) and replica methods for measuring marginal and internal fit of full coverage restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A maxillary left first molar typodent was fixed on to an aluminum base and prepared to receive all-ceramic full coverage restoration. The model was scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam, Sirona, York, PA, USA). Twelve crowns were fabricated from lithium disilicate blocks (IPS emax CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) and then crystalized. Marginal and internal fit of each restoration was measured by two examiners using replica and a new digital three-dimensional technique. Reliability between the two methods and two examiners was assessed by correlation and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (P<.05). A Bland-Altman assessment for agreement was used to compare the two methods. RESULTS. Bland-Altman assessment showed that the mean of difference for marginal, absolute marginal, and axial gap was respectively -1.04 ㎛, -41.9 ㎛, and -29.53 ㎛ with limit of agreement (LOA) between -37.26 to 35.18 ㎛ for marginal, -105.85 to 22.05 ㎛ for absolute marginal and -80.52 to 22.02 ㎛ for axial gap. Positive correlation for repeatability (P<.05) in determining marginal and internal gaps by the two examiners in both techniques was revealed. Reliability of both techniques in all sites of measurements was at least good (0.8 ≤ α < 0.9). CONCLUSION. Both measuring techniques appeared highly reliable for evaluating fit of fixed dental restorations, while reference point matching provided higher values in axial and absolute marginal gap assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:343-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0224-6
  2. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, Mercante DE. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010
  3. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60047-0
  4. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:319-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00622.x
  5. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5
  6. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:378-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0
  7. Euan R, Figueras-Alvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Brufau-de Barbera M, Gomes-Azevedo S. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines. J Prosthodont 2012;21:291-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00831.x
  8. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  9. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, Qian F. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:304-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.015
  10. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995;40:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
  11. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  12. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:250-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.023
  13. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:554-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.001
  14. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont 2013;22:419-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006
  15. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  16. Falk A, Vult von Steyern P, Fransson H, Thoren MM. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:179-80. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4132
  17. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:747-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O
  18. Koulivand S, Ghodsi S, Siadat H, Alikhasi M. A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:236-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12527
  19. Boitelle P, Tapie L, Mawussi B, Fromentin O. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: Comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.026
  20. Orteu JJ. 3-D computer vision in experimental mechanics. Opt Laser Eng 2009;47:282-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.11.009
  21. Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J. Shape context: A new descriptor for shape matching and object recognition. Adv Neur In. 2002, 24: p. 509-22.
  22. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  23. Kwak SK, Kim JH. Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017;70:407-11. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407
  24. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psycho 1993;78:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  25. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-92.
  26. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  27. Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, Park J, Lee KB, Jeon M, Yun BJ. A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Med 2019;8. pii: E785.
  28. de Almeida IG, Antunes DB, Braun NX, Restani A, Straioto FG, Galhano GA. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types? Indian J Dent Res 2019;30:127-9.
  29. Al Hamad KQ, Al Quran FA, AlJalam SA, Baba NZ. Comparison of the accuracy of fit of metal, zirconia, and lithium disilicate crowns made from different manufacturing techniques. J Prosthodont 2019;28:497-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13029
  30. De Freitas BN, Tonin BSH, Macedo AP, Dos Santos TMP, De Mattos MDGC, Hotta TH, Matsumoto W. Adaptation accuracy of milled lithium disilicate crowns: A 2D and 3D microCT analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:403-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12574
  31. Sadid-Zadeh R, Li R, Miller LM, Simon M. Effect of fabrication technique on the marginal discrepancy and resistance of lithium disilicate crowns: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:1005-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13014
  32. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:4043-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02840-0
  33. Elrashid AH, AlKahtani AH, Alqahtani SJ, Alajmi NB, Alsultan FH. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal fit of E.max press and E.max computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing lithium disilicate ceramic crowns: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019;9:178-84. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_18_19
  34. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013;29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
  35. Oka Y, Sasaki J, Wakabayashi K, Nakano Y, Okamura SY, Nakamura T, Imazato S, Yatani H. Fabrication of a radiopaque fit-testing material to evaluate the three-dimensional accuracy of dental prostheses. Dent Mater 2016;32:921-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.011
  36. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater 2013;29:851-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
  37. Park JM, Hammerle CHF, Benic GI. Digital technique for in vivo assessment of internal and marginal fit of fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:452-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.016