Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회지)

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≤ 5 cm) with Saline-Perfused Electrodes: Factors Affecting Local Tumor Progression

5 cm 이하의 간암에서 식염수 주입방식 전극을 이용한 고주파 소작술: 국소 재발에 영향을 미치는 인자

  • Dong Ho Kim (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Dong Jin Chung (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Se Hyun Cho (Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Joon-Yeol Han (Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김동호 (가톨릭대학교 여의도성모병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 정동진 (가톨릭대학교 여의도성모병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 조세현 (가톨릭대학교 여의도성모병원 소화기내과) ;
  • 한준열 (가톨릭대학교 여의도성모병원 소화기내과)
  • Received : 2019.06.06
  • Accepted : 2019.09.14
  • Published : 2020.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to assess local tumor progression (LTP) rate and associated prognostic factors in 92 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using saline-perfused electrodes to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≤ 5 cm). Materials and Methods Total 92 patients with 148 HCCs were treated with RFA using saline-perfused electrodes, from 2009 to 2015. We retrospectively evaluated technical success, technique efficacy, and LTP rates. Potential prognostic factors for LTP were perivascular tumor, subphrenic tumor, artificial ascites, tumor size (≥ 2 cm), and previous treatment of transarterial chemoembolization. Analysis was performed by lesion, rather than by person. Results During follow-up period from 1 to 97.4 months, total cumulative LTP rates were 7.9%, 11.4%, and 14.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. These values were significantly higher in the perivascular (35.1%; p = 0.009) and subphrenic group (38.9%; p = 0.002) at 5-year. We did not observe any significant difference in LTP according to other prognostic factors (p > 0.05). Conclusion RFA with saline-perfused electrode is a safe and effective treatment modality for HCC (≤ 5 cm), with lower LTP rates. Nevertheless, perivascular and subphrenic HCCs demonstrated higher LTP rate than other sites. It is imperative to note that perivascular and subphrenic location of HCC are associated with a high risk of local recurrence, despite the use of saline-perfused electrodes.

목적 5 cm 이하 크기의 간암을 가진 92명의 환자군에서 식염수 주입방식 전극을 이용한 고주파 소작술의 국소 재발률과 예후인자를 평가하였다. 대상과 방법 2009년부터 2015년까지 간암으로 식염수 주입전극 고주파 소작술을 받은 92명 환자(148개 간암)를 대상으로 하였다. 후향적으로 기술적인 성공과 효능, 국소 재발률을 분석하였다. 국소 재발의 가능한 예후인자로써 혈관주위종양, 횡경막하종양, 인공복수 유무, 2 cm이상 크기, 이전 간동맥색전술 치료 여부를 평가하였다. 결과는 각각의 병변 별로 분석하였다. 결과 1~97.4개월의 추적관찰 기간 동안 누적 국소 재발률은 1년, 3년, 5년에서 각각 7.9%, 11.4%, 14.6%였다. 5년 누적 국소 재발률은 혈관주위간암과(35.1%; p = 0.009) 횡경막하간 암에서(38.9%; p = 0.002) 각각 비교군에 비해 유의미하게 높았다. 다른 예후인자들에서 국소 재발률의 유의미한 차이는 없었다(p > 0.05). 결론 식염수 주입전극을 이용한 고주파 소작술은 5 cm 이하 크기의 간암을 국소 재발률 증가없이 안전하고 효과적으로 치료할 수 있다. 그렇지만 식염수 주입전극으로도 혈관 주위와 횡경막하 위치의 간암은 다른 부위에 비해 국소 재발률이 높으므로, 혈관주위간암과 횡경막하간암은 식염수 주입전극을 이용한 고주파 소작술에서도 국소 재발의 위험성이 크다는 것을 유념하여야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2012;379:1245-1255
  2. Curley SA, Izzo F, Ellis LM, Nicolas Vauthey J, Vallone P. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular cancer in 110 patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2000;232:381-391
  3. Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, Olschewski M, Deibert P, Crocetti L, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 2003;228:235-240
  4. Shibata T, Shibata T, Maetani Y, Isoda H, Hiraoka M. Radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective comparison of internally cooled electrode and expandable electrode. Radiology 2006;238:346-353
  5. Cho YK, Kim JK, Kim MY, Rhim H, Han JK. Systematic review of randomized trials for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous ablation therapies. Hepatology 2009;49:453-459
  6. McWilliams JP, Yamamoto S, Raman SS, Loh CT, Lee EW, Liu DM, et al. Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:S204-S213
  7. Xu HX, Lu MD, Xie XY, Yin XY, Kuang M, Chen JW, et al. Prognostic factors for long-term outcome after percutaneous thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a survival analysis of 137 consecutive patients. Clin Radiol 2005;60:1018-1025
  8. Vivarelli M, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Cucchetti A, Bellusci R, Cordiano C, et al. Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver. Ann Surg 2004;240:102-107
  9. Hong SN, Lee SY, Choi MS, Lee JH, Koh KC, Paik SW, et al. Comparing the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgery in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma and well-preserved hepatic function. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:247-252
  10. Montorsi M, Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Donadon M, Moroni E, Spinelli A, et al. Survival and recurrences after hepatic resection or radiofrequency for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a multivariate analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:62-67; discussion 67-68
  11. Nam SY, Rhim H, Kang TW, Lee MW, Kim YS, Choi D, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumors abutting the diaphragm: clinical assessment of the heat-sink effect of artificial ascites. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W227-W231
  12. Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S, Onaga M, Motoda M, Moriuchi A, et al. Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol 2003;38:977-981
  13. Kim YS, Rhim H, Cho OK, Koh BH, Kim Y. Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors. Eur J Radiol 2006;59:432-441
  14. Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K, Yamasaki N, Shibatou T, Maeda M, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 2003;97:1253-1262
  15. Nakazawa T, Kokubu S, Shibuya A, Ono K, Watanabe M, Hidaka H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between local tumor progression after ablation and ablative margin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:480-488
  16. Kim SH, Lim HK, Choi D, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Kim MJ, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of histologic grade on therapeutic results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:S327-S333
  17. Sofocleous CT, Nascimento RG, Petrovic LM, Klimstra DS, Gonen M, Brown KT, et al. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes after RF ablation of liver malignancies can help predict local tumor progression: initial results. Radiology 2008;249:364-374
  18. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, De Stefano G, Scala V, Liorre G, Scarano F, et al. Percutaneous sonographically guided saline-enhanced radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:479-484
  19. Kim JH, Kim PN, Won HJ, Shin YM. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:471-476
  20. Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. Radiology 2014;273:241-260
  21. Lu DS, Raman SS, Limanond P, Aziz D, Economou J, Busuttil R, et al. Influence of large peritumoral vessels on outcome of radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:1267-1274
  22. Kang TW, Lim HK, Lee MW, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lee WJ, et al. Long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched study. Radiology 2016;280:300-312
  23. Lee DH, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as first-line treatment: long-term results and prognostic factors in 162 patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 2014;270:900-909
  24. Lee S, Kang TW, Cha DI, Song KD, Lee MW, Rhim H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs. surgery for perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score analyses of long-term outcomes. J Hepatol 2018;69:70-78
  25. Kang TW, Lim HK, Lee MW, Kim YS, Choi D, Rhim H. Perivascular versus nonperivascular small HCC treated with percutaneous RF ablation: retrospective comparison of long-term therapeutic outcomes. Radiology 2014;270:888-899
  26. Mori Y, Tamai H, Shingaki N, Moribata K, Shiraki T, Deguchi H, et al. Diffuse intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for solitary and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 2009;3:509-515
  27. Kang TW, Rhim H, Kim EY, Kim YS, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the hepatocellular carcinoma abutting the diaphragm: assessment of safety and therapeutic efficacy. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:34-42
  28. Song KD, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee MW, Kang TW, Paik YH, et al. Hepatic resection vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma abutting right diaphragm. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;11:227-237
  29. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018;67:358-380