DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Duty of Fair Presentation after the Enactment of the Insurance Act 2015: The Case of Korea and China

  • Ahn, Tae-Kun (Division of International Commerce, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Ryong (School of Economics and Trade, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Peng, Tian (Division of International Commerce, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.02
  • Accepted : 2019.10.30
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions and related caselaw of the Insurance Act 2015 to gain a clearer understanding of the differences between the Act and the preceding legislation. Design/methodology - The authors analyzed caselaw from South Korea and China that involved breaches of the duty of disclosure. Cases highlighting differences between the duties of disclosure and fair presentation were selected. Findings - Changes in the practice of marine insurance laws are expected from the application of the reformed duty of presentation provisions. In particular, the rights of the insured are expected to increase, resulting in the fairer conduct of insurance contracts. Due to the fact that the Insurance Act 2015 has only recently taken effect, the provisions of existing caselaw have not yet been applied. This has limited the authors' scope of analysis. Originality/value - This paper describes the implications of the duty of fair presentation by analyzing caselaw from South Korea and China that involves the duty of disclosure. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions of the Insurance Act 2015 in the context of the legislation's implications for trade practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Birds, J. (2016), Modern Insurance Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  2. Dunt, J. (2016), Marine Cargo Insurance, Abingdon, UK: Informa Law from Routledge.
  3. Han, Chang-Hi (2018), "A Study on the Relation between the Breach of the Warranties and the Loss under the English Insurance Act 2015", Kookmin Law Review, 31(1), 243-287.
  4. Han, Nak-Hyun and Jun-Sik Jung (2015), "A Practical Application of Warranty under A Marine Insurance Contract", Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 11(4), 257-281. https://doi.org/10.16980/JITC.11.4.201508.257
  5. Jaffe, P. (2013), "Reform of the Insurance Law of England and Wales - Separate Laws for the Different needs of Businesses and Consumers", Tulane Law Review, 87, 1075-1128.
  6. Jeon, Hae-Dong and Gun-Hoon Shin (2016), "A Study on the Recent Trends for Reforming the MIA 1906 and Comments on them: Focusing on the Insurance Act 2015", The International Commerce & Law Review, 69, 407-426.
  7. Kendall, D. and H. Wright (2017), A Practical Guide to the Insurance Act 2015, Abingdon, UK: Informa Law from Routledge.
  8. Law Commissions (2009), Consumer Insurance Law: Pre-contract Disclosure and Misrepresentation (LAW COM, No. 319), London: Law Commissions.
  9. Law Commissions (2014), Insurance Contract Law: Business Disclosure; Warranties; Insurers' Remedies for Fraudulent Claims; and Late Payment (LAW COM No. 353), London: Law Commissions.
  10. Eggers, P. M. Q. C. (2017), "The Fair Presentation of Commercial Risks under the Insurance Act 2015". In M. Clarke and B. Soyer (Eds.), The Insurance Act 2015 - A New Regime for Commercial and Marine Insurance Law, Abingdon, UK: Informa Law from Routledge.
  11. McGee, A. (2006), The Modern Law of Marine Insurance (2nd ed.), London: LexisNexis Butterworths.
  12. Nam, Woong-Hyun (2008), A Study on Duty of Utmost Good Faith under Marine Insurance Contract - with Main Differences between U.K. and U.S. (Master's Thesis), Jinju, Korea: Kyungnam University.
  13. Rix, B. (2017), "Conclusion: General Reflections on the Law Reform" . In M. Clarke and B. Soyer (Eds.), The Insurance Act 2015 - A New Regime for Commercial and Marine Insurance Law, Abingdon, UK: Informa Law from Routledge.
  14. Schoenbaum, T. J. (1998), "The Duty of Utmost Good Faith in Marine Insurance Law: A Comparative Analysis of American and English Law", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 29(1), 1-39.
  15. Song, M. (2012), "The UK's Law Commissions' Reform Project in Respect of Marine Insurance", Chinese Journal of Maritime Law, 1.
  16. Higher People's Court of Tianjin Municipality: Last Instance Civil Judgment No. 58 Decided 2008.
  17. Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Province: Last Instance Civil Judgment No. 319 Decided 2016.
  18. Korean Supreme Court Decision 95da28779 Decided March 8, 1996.
  19. Korean Supreme Court Decision 99da26221 Decided May 15, 2001.
  20. Korean Supreme Court Decision 2004da22711, 22728 Decided March 25, 2005.
  21. Korean Supreme Court Decision 2017da272103 Decided October 25, 2018.
  22. Manifest Shipping Co. Ltd v. Uni-Polaris Shipping Co. Ltd. (The Star Sea), United Kingdom House of Lords, Decided January 18, 2001.
  23. Stokell v. Heywood (1897), 1 ch. 459.
  24. Supreme People's Court (2013), Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on several issues concerning the application of the insurance law of the People's Republic of China (II), Article 6. Available from http://www.cmac.org.cn/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Interpretations-of-Supreme-People%E2%80%99s-Court-on-Several-Issues-Pertaining-to-Application-of-the-Insurance-Law-of-the-People%E2%80%99s-Republic-of-China-II.pdf
  25. The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012. Available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/6/contents/enacted
  26. The Insurance Act 2015. Available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/4/contents/enacted
  27. The Insurance Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 16. Available from http://www.fdi.gov.cn/1800000121_39_3063_0_7.html
  28. The Law of the Sea of the People's Republic of China, Article 222. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40704902?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  29. The Marine Insurance Act 1906. Available from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41/contents