Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Requirements for the Buyer's Right to Withhold Performance for the Seller's Actual Non-Performance under the CISG and the CESL

  • Lee, Byung-Mun (Department of Global Commerce, Soongsil University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Young (Department of International Trade, Graduate School, Soongsil University)
  • Received : 2020.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.12.15
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - The buyer's right to withhold performance is a useful and important self-help remedy to protect himself from the seller's breach of contract, and it is also the coercive means to induce the seller to perform his part of contract. However, the buyer's exercise of such a right often exposes himself to the risk of breaching the contract. This is generally due to his ignorance when he is entitled to the right and also uncertainties inherent in the law. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine what the requirements should be fulfilled before the buyer exercises the right for the seller's actual breach of contract. Design/methodology - In order to achieve the purposes of the study, it executes a comparative study of the rules as to the requirements for the buyer's right to withhold performance for the seller's actual non-performance under the CISG and the CESL. It mainly focuses on performance due, the seller's non-performance, the buyer's readiness to perform and the requirement of notice. Findings - The main findings of this comparative study can be summarized as follows: Although the CISG has no expressive provision for the buyer's general right to withhold performance for the seller's actual non-performance, it may be inferred from the general principles the CISG underlies, synallagmatic nature of the contract. In addition, it can be drawn by analogy from relevant provisions of the CISG. On the other hand, the CESL expressively provides that the buyer has a general right to withhold performance where the seller fails to tender performance or perform the contract. Therefore, it seems that the position of CESL is rather easier and more apparent to allow the buyer to withhold performance for the seller's non-performance. Originality/value - Most of the existing studies on the right to withhold performance under the CISG have centered on the right to withhold performance for an anticipatory breach of contract. On the other hand, there have been few prior studies on the right to withhold performance for the actual nonperformance during a contractual period of performance. Therefore, this paper examined the requirements for the buyer's right to withhold performance under the CISG and the CESL in a comparative way for the seller's actual breach of obligation. In this conclusion, it may provide practical and legal considerations and implications for business people who are not certain about the right to withhold performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Bianca, C. M. and M. J. Bonell (1987), Commentary on the International Sales Law, The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention, Milan, Italy: Giuffre.
  2. Enderlein, F. and D. Maskow (1992), International Sales Law, New York, NY: Oceana Publications.
  3. Ha Kyung-Hyo, Se-Il Ko, Kyu-Wan Kim, Sang-Joong Kim, Kyoung-Il Paek, Byung-Jun Lee, Joon-Hyun and Jin-Ki Lee (2014), Common European Sales Law, Seoul: Se-Chang Press.
  4. Huber, P. and A. Mullis (2014), The CISG - A New Textbook for Students and Ractitioners (2nd ed.), Munchen, Germany: European Law Publisher.
  5. Jafarzadeh, M. (1998), The Buyer's Remedies for Seller's Non-Conforming Delivery: A Comparative Study under English Law, the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and Shiah Law (Doctoral Dissertation), Sheffield, UK: Sheffield University.
  6. Karton, J. (2009), "Contract Law in International Commercial Arbitration: The Case of Suspension of Performance", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58(4), 863-896. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001419
  7. Kroll, S., L. Mistelis and P. P. Viscasillas (eds.), (2018), UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the CISG) (2nd ed.), Munchen, Germany: C. H. Beck.
  8. Lee, Byung-Mun (2002), "A Comparative Study on the Buyer's Right to Withhold Performance for the Seller's Delivery of Defective Goods and Documents in International Sales within the CISG, English Law and Korean Law", The International Commerce and Law Review, 17, 251-293.
  9. Lee, Byung-Mun and Dong-Young Kim (2020), "A Study on the Buyer's Right to Withhold Performance for the Seller's Actual Non-performance under the CISG", Industrial Economic Research Review, 33(3), 795-815.
  10. Nyer, D. (2006) "Withholding Performance for Breach in International Transactions: An Exercise in Equations, Proportions or Coercion", Pace International Law Review, 18(1), 29-82.
  11. Oh, Won-Suk and Kang-Hun Ha (2013), Understanding the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Seoul: Sam-Young-Sa.
  12. Paek, Kyoung-Il (2013), "Der Vertragsschluss im Gemeinsamen Europaischen Kaufrecht", Journal of Comparative Private Law, 20(2), 433-476.
  13. Schulze, R. (2012), Common European Sales Law (CESL), Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
  14. Schwenzer, I. (ed.), (2016), Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (the CISG) (4th ed.), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  15. Schwenzer, I., P. Hachem and C. Kee (2012), Global Sales and Contract Law, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 548-559.
  16. Shim, Gap-young and Chong-Seok Shim (2015), "A Study on the Seller's Obligations and the Buyer's Remedies under Common European Sales Law: Focusing on Comparison with the CISG", Korea International Commerce Review, 30(4), 51-71.
  17. Suk, Kwang-Hyun (2010), Legal Theory on Contracts for International Sale of Goods: Commentary on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Good, Seoul: Pak-Young-Sa.
  18. UNCITRAL (n.d.), Status: United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna,1980) (the CISG). Available from https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/theISG/status
  19. We, Kye-Chan (2015), "Obligations of the Buyer under the Contract for International Sale of Goods: focused on the duty of the buyer to pay the price and to take delivery of the goods under Proposal for Regulation of Common European Sales Law", Study on Law and Politics, 15(4), 1645-1678.