DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The 2019 Hong Kong-Mainland China Arrangement on Mutual Assistance in Court-ordered Interim Measures: A Major Breakthrough for Hong Kong-seated International Arbitral Proceedings

  • Received : 2020.05.12
  • Accepted : 2020.09.28
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

Purpose - This paper examines the "Arrangement Concerning Mutual Assistance in Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of Arbitral Proceedings by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" (the Arrangement), which became effective on October 1, 2019, calling on courts of mainland China and Hong Kong for reciprocal commitment in support of court-ordered interim measures in aid of arbitral proceedings. Because the Hong Kong courts have granted interim measures in aid of arbitral proceedings seated in and outside of Hong Kong even prior to the Arrangement becoming effective, this paper focuses on the significance of the Arrangement making Hong Kong the first and only seat outside of mainland China from which parties to arbitral proceedings may successfully obtain interim measures to preserve of assets, properties, and/or evidence from Chinese courts to be enforced in China. Design/methodology - The significance of interim measures in international arbitration and the existing circumstances of interim measures in support of international arbitral proceedings in mainland China and Hong Kong are discussed first in this paper. Due to the confidential nature of arbitral proceedings, while the details of applications for interim measures pursuant to the Arrangement cannot be discussed, in examining the implications of the Arrangement, the relevant and necessary information was made available from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, as it is one of the six qualified arbitral institutions under the Arrangement. Findings - This groundbreaking Arrangement provides a mechanism for parties with China-related matters to more effectively resolve their disputes, the opportunity for Hong Kong to become an unparalleled seat of arbitration, and for mainland China to overcome some of its negative perceptions in international arbitration. Because the Arrangement also allows parties to directly apply for interim measures from mainland Chinese courts, parties with China-related matters should take note of this potential bypassing of the procedural hurdle, which usually requires an arbitral institution to submit such applications in China, and make strategic decisions accordingly as may be appropriate. Originality/value - Because the Arrangement is a recent yet a significant agreement calling on courts of mainland China and Hong Kong for reciprocal commitment in support of court-ordered interim measures in aid of arbitral proceedings, this study will provide useful guidance for parties with China-related matters all over the world, especially in light of China's rapid economic growth and extensive and prominent trade relationships in today's world. Parties who foresee the need for interim measures from mainland Chinese courts should designate Hong Kong as their seat of arbitration and select one of the six qualified arbitral institutions under the Arrangement to administer their arbitral proceedings in order to benefit from the Arrangement.

Keywords

References

  1. Born, G. B. (2012), International Arbitration: Law and Practice, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 27-116.
  2. Eliasson, N. (2010), "A Brief Introduction to Arbitration in Hong Kong", 23-SPG International Law Practicum, 46-49.
  3. Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) (2020, April 22), "Hong Kong-Mainland China Interim Measures Arrangement: A Game Changer", Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) Webinar Series, Online.
  4. International Arbitration Survey (2010), Choices in International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and School of International Arbitration. Available from http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2010_InternationalArbitrationSurveyReport.pdf (accessed July 30, 2020)
  5. International Arbitration Survey (2015), Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and School of International Arbitration. Available from http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2015_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf (accessed July 30, 2020)
  6. International Arbitration Survey (2018), The Evolution of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University London and White & Case. Available from http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF (accessed July 30, 2020)
  7. Nobles, K. C. (2012), "Emerging Issues and Trends in International Arbitration", California Western International Law Journal, 43(1), 77-108.
  8. Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) (n.d.), The Observatory of Economic Complexity. Available from https://oec.world (accessed July 30, 2020)
  9. Tao, J. (2012), "Salient Issues in Arbitration in China", American University International Law Review, 27(4), 807-830.
  10. Trigo, A. C. (2016), "Recent Developments in Arbitration in China - Interim Measures, How to Achieve Proper Relief", Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration, 20, 55-94.
  11. World Economic Forum (2018), The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Available from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2018 (accessed July 30, 2020)
  12. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2015), Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning Laws Application to Review of the Conduct Preservation for Intellectual Property and Competition Dispute Cases. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/cn/cn089en.pdf (accessed July 30, 2020)
  13. Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/cn/cn138en.pdf?crazycache=1
  14. Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance. Available from https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap609
  15. Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) Administered Arbitration Rules (2018). Available from https://www.hkiac.org/sites/default/files/ck_filebrowser/PDF/arbitration/2018_hkiac_rules.pdf
  16. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules of Arbitration (2017), Art. 28. Available from https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/
  17. Italian Civil Procedure Code, Art. 818. Available from http://www.arbitrations.ru/userfiles/file/Law/ Arbitration%20acts/Italian%20Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure.pdf
  18. London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Arbitration Rules (2014), Art. 25. Available from https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2014.aspx
  19. Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Arbitration Rules (2016), Art. 30. Available from https://www.siac.org.sg/our-rules/rules/siac-rules-2016
  20. Top Gains Minerals Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd. v. TL Resources Pte Ltd., HCMP 1622/2015 (2015).
  21. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (2006). Available from https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf