Acknowledgement
The present research was supported by the research fund of Dankook University in 2019.
References
- Aggarwal, A. (2011), "Effects of Anti-dumping in India: Who Benefits?", The International Trade Journal, 25(1), 112-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2011.532047
- Anderson, J. E. (1992), "Domino Dumping, I: Competitive Exporters", The American Economic Review, 82(1), 65-83.
- Blonigen, B. and C. Bown (2003),"Antidumping and Retaliation Threats", Journal of International Economics, 60(2), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00055-7
- Fischer, R. D. (1992), "Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm Behavior", Journal of International Economics, 32(1-2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(92)90040-Q
- Ganguli, B. (2008), "The Trade Effects of Indian Antidumping Actions", Review of International Economics, 16(5), 930-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00759.x
- Konings, J., H. Vandenbussche and L. Springael (2001), "Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy", Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade, 1(3), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015269804381
- Krupp, C. M. and P. S. Pollard (1996),"Market Responses to Antidumping Laws: Some Evidence from the U.S. Chemical Industry", The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 199-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/136159
- Park, Soon-Chan (2009), "The Trade Depressing and Trade Diversion Effects of Antidumping Actions: The Case of China", China Economic Review, 20, 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2009.03.006
- Prusa, T. J. (1992),"Why are so Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?", Journal of International Economics, 33, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(92)90047-N
- Prusa, T. J. (1996), The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions (NBER Working Paper, No. 5440), Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Prusa, T. J. (2001), "On the Spread and Impact of Anti-Dumping", The Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(3), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00090
- Prusa, T. J. and S. Skeath (2002),"The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings", WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, 138(3), 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707946
- Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1991), Strategic Use of Antidumping Law to Enforce International Collusion (Working Paper), Stanford, CA: Stanford University and NBER.
- Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1994),"Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1994, 51-118.
- Taylor, C. T. (2004), "The Economic Effects of Withdrawn Antidumping Investigations: Is there Evidence of Collusive Settlements?", Journal of International Economics, 62, 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00051-5
- Vandenbussche, H. and Zanardi, M. (2010), "The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation", European Economic Review, 54(6), 760-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003
- Veugelers, R. and H. Vandenbussche (1999), "European Anti-Dumping Policy and the Profitability of National and International Collusion", European Economic Review, 43(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00128-1
- Zanardi, M. (2004), "Antidumping Law as a Collusive Device", Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(1), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.005_1.x