Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Headquarters' Levels of Control and Subsidiaries' Local Experiences on Competency in Foreign Subsidiaries: A Quadratic Model Investigation of Korean Multinational Corporations

  • Lee, Jae-Eun (Division of Business and Commerce, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Kang, Joo-Yeon (Office for Government Policy Coordination) ;
  • Park, Jung-Min (School of Business Administration, University of Ulsan)
  • Received : 2019.10.15
  • Accepted : 2020.01.20
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to overcome the limitations of existing studies, which linearly determine the precedence factors of competency in overseas subsidiaries. The research objectives are as follows. First, what kind of nonlinear effects does the level of control held by Korean headquarters over foreign subsidiaries have in terms of competency in the subsidiaries? Second, what kind of nonlinear effects do the local experiences of overseas subsidiaries have on their competency? Design/methodology - With data on Korean multinational corporations (MNCs), this paper analyzes the effects of control levels of headquarters (HQs) and host-country experiences of foreign subsidiaries regarding competency in overseas subsidiaries. In particular, this study focuses on nonlinear models, differentiating it from previous studies. In order to examine research hypotheses, this study conducted a survey of overseas subsidiaries of Korean corporations. Surveys were conducted through various methods including e-mail, online questionnaires, fax, and telephone calls. Copies of the questionnaire were distributed to a total of 2,246 overseas subsidiaries, and 409 completed responses were collected. Excluding 15 copies that were insufficiently answered, responses from a total of 394 copies were used for analysis. Findings - This study presents the following results. First, there is a U-shaped relationship between levels of HQ control and competency in foreign subsidiaries. This means that higher levels of HQ control negatively impact the competency levels of subsidiaries because strict control undermines autonomy in subsidiaries. However, if the level of HQ control exceeds a certain point, then the transfer of knowledge between HQs and subsidiaries is facilitated. Knowledge transferred from HQs can be used as prior knowledge by foreign subsidiaries to the benefit of all parties. Accordingly, knowledge transfer negates the negative effects of excessive HQ control and positively affects competency in subsidiaries. Second, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the local (host-country) experiences of subsidiaries and competency in foreign subsidiaries. This means that foreign subsidiaries can overcome the liabilities of foreignness and contribute to capability building by accumulating unique knowledge about their host countries. However, if local experiences accumulate excessively beyond a certain point, then the host country-specific experiences of foreign subsidiaries will offset the benefits discussed above. Excessive local experiences not only increase organizational inertia, but also create a problem of goal incongruence due to information asymmetry between HQs and subsidiaries. Therefore, excessive local experiences have negative effects on competency in foreign subsidiaries. Originality/value - This study suggests the following implications. First, unlike existing studies based mainly on linear models, this study presents important theoretical implications in its focus on nonlinear models and its analysis of the effects of HQ control and local experiences on competency in foreign subsidiaries from perspectives of organizational learning theory and agency theory. Second, in terms of practical implications, the results of this study suggest that optimally raising levels of HQ control and managing the local experiences of subsidiaries without increasing organizational inertia is important for enhancing competency in foreign subsidiaries.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Sunchon National University Research Fund in 2017 (Grant number: 2018-0002).

References

  1. Almeida, P. and A. Phene (2004), "Subsidiaries and Knowledge Creation: The Influence of the MNC and Host Country on Innovation", Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.388
  2. Ambos, B., K. Asakawa and T. C. Ambos (2011), "A Dynamic Perspective on Subsidiary Autonomy", Global Strategy Journal, 1(3-4), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.25
  3. Andersson, U. and M. Forsgren (2000), "In Search of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations", Management International Review, 40(4), 329-350.
  4. Andersson, U., M. Forsgren and U. Holm (2002), "The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation", Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.267
  5. Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1986), "Tap Your Subsidiaries for Global Reach", Harvard Business Review, 64(6), 87-94.
  6. Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1998), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Belderbos, R. A. and M. G. Heijltjes (2005), "The Determinants of Expatriate Staffing by Japanese Multinationals in Asia: Control, Learning and Vertical Business Groups", Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400135
  8. Bennett, N. and J. Lemoine (2014), "What VUCA Really Means for You", Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 1-10.
  9. Birkinshaw, J. (1997), "Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives", Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 207-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199703)18:3<207::AID-SMJ864>3.0.CO;2-Q
  10. Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood (1998), "Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-owned Subsidiary Companies", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255638
  11. Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood and S. Jonsson (1998), "Building Firm Specific Advantages in the Role of Subsidiary Initiative", Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<221::AID-SMJ948>3.0.CO;2-P
  12. Birkinshaw, J. and A. J. Morrison (1995), "Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiary of Multinational Corporations", Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 729-753. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490818
  13. Bjorkman, I., W. Barner-Rasmussen and L. Li (2004), "Managing Knowledge Transfer in MNCs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms", Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094
  14. Brush, C. G. and P. Vander Werf (1992), "A Comparison of Methods and Sources for Obtaining Estimates of New Venture Performance", Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90010-O
  15. Chang, S. J. (1995), "International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building through Sequential Entry", Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 383-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/256685
  16. Chatterjee, S. and A. S. Hadi (2006), Regression Analysis by Example (4th ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
  17. Christensen, C. M. (2016), The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  18. Cohen, W. and D. A. Levinthal (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  19. Collinson, S. C. and R. Wang (2012), "The Evolution of Innovation Capability in Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries: Dual Network Embeddedness and the Divergence of Subsidiary Specialisation in Taiwan", Research Policy, 41(9), 1501-1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.007
  20. Delios, A. and P. W. Beamish (2001), "Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance", Academy of Management, 44(5), 1028-1038.
  21. DiBella, A. J., E. C. Nevis and J. M. Gould (1996), "Understanding Organizational Learning Capability", Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x
  22. Dodgson, M. (1993), "Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures", Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
  23. Egelhoff, W. G. (1998), Organizing the Multinational Enterprise: An Information-processing Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985), "Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches", Management Science, 31(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134
  25. Eriksson, K., J. Johanson, A. Majkgard and D. D. Sharma (1997), "Experiential Knowledge and Costs in the Internationalization Process", Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490104
  26. Eriksson, K., A. Majkgard and D. D. Sharma (2000), "Path Dependence and Knowledge Development in the Internationalization Process", Management International Review, 40(4), 307-328.
  27. Fiol, C. M. and M. A. Lyles (1985), "Organizational Learning", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
  28. Frost, T. S. (2001), "The Geographic Sources of Foreign Subsidiaries' Innovations", Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<101::AID-SMJ155>3.0.CO;2-G
  29. Frost, T. S., J. Birkinshaw and P. Ensign (2002), "Centers of Excellence in Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 997-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.273
  30. Gao, G., Y. Pan, J. Lu and Z. Tao (2008), "Performance of Multinational Firms' Subsidiaries: Influences of Cumulative Experience", Management International Review, 48(6), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0105-x
  31. Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett (1988), "Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations", Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490388
  32. Ghoshal, S., H. Korine and G. Szulanski (1994), "Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations", Management Science, 40(1), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.1.96
  33. Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria (1989), "Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100403
  34. Ghoshal, S. and E. D. Westney (1993), "Introduction and Overview". In S. Ghoshal and E. D. Westney (Eds.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-23.
  35. Gupta, A. and V. Govindarajan (2000), "Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
  36. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  37. Hannan, M. T. and J. Freeman (1984), "Structural Inertia and Organizational Change", American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
  38. Hill, R. C. and D. Hellriegel (1994), "Critical Contingencies in Joint Venture Management: Some Lessons from Managers", Organization Science, 5(4), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.594
  39. Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, London: Sage.
  40. Holm, U., C. Holmstrom and D. Sharma (2005), "Competence Development through Business Relationships or Competitive Environment? Subsidiary Impact on MNC Competitive Advantage", Management International Review, 45(2), 197-218.
  41. Holm, U. and T. Pedersen (2000), The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centers of Excellence-Subsidiary Perspective, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  42. Hong, Doug-Pyo and Soon-Kyoo Choe (2006), "The Determinant of the International Transfer of Innovation Know-how between Headquarters and Subsidiaries", Korean Management Review, 35(2), 645-670.
  43. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976), "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  44. Jensen, R. and G. Szulanski (2004), "Stickiness and the Adaptation of Organizational Practices in Cross-border Knowledge Transfers", Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 508-523. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107
  45. Johnston, S. and B. Menguc (2007), "Subsidiary Size and the Level of Subsidiary Autonomy in Multinational Corporations: A Quadratic Model Investigation of Australian Subsidiaries", Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 787-801. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400294
  46. Kelly, D. and T. L. Amburgey (1991), "Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model of Strategic Change", Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 591-612. https://doi.org/10.2307/256407
  47. Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), "The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode", Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
  48. Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1992), "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology", Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  49. Laamanen, T., J. A. Lamberg and E. Vaara (2016), "Explanations of Success and Failure in Management Learning: What Can We Learn from Nokia's Rise and Fall?", Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15(1), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0177
  50. Lane, P. J. and M. Lubatkin (1998), "Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning", Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
  51. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), "Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  52. Levitt, B. and J. G. March (1988), "Organizational Learning", Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
  53. Li, J. (1995), "Foreign Entry and Survival: Effects of Strategic Choices on Performance in International Markets", Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 332-351.
  54. Li, C. Y. and C. T. Hsieh (2009), "The Impact of Knowledge Stickiness on Knowledge Transfer Implementation, Internalization, and Satisfaction for Multinational Corporations", International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.06.004
  55. Liu, X., L. Gao, J. Lu and E. Lioliou (2016), "Does Learning at Home and from Abroad Boost the Foreign Subsidiary Performance of Emerging Economy Multinational Enterprises?", International Business Review, 25(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.012
  56. Lucas, H. C., Jr. and J. M. Goh (2009), "Disruptive Technology: How Kodak Missed the Digital Photography Revolution", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.01.002
  57. Luo, Y. (2003), "Market-seeking MNEs in an Emerging Market: How Parent-subsidiary Links Shape Overseas Success", Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400027
  58. March, J. G. (1991), "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  59. Moore, L. and J. Birkinshaw (1998), "Managing Knowledge in Global Service Firms: Centers of Excellence", Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 81-92.
  60. Nobel, R. and J. Birkinshaw (1998), "Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Patterns in International R&D Operations", Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<479::AID-SMJ954>3.0.CO;2-U
  61. Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1994), "Differentiated Fit and Shared Values: Alternatives for Managing Headquarters-Subsidiary Relations", Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150606
  62. Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  63. O'Donell, S. W. (2000), "Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: Agents of Headquarters, or an Independent Network?", Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 535-548.
  64. Ozsomer, A. and E. Gencturk (2003), "A Resource-based Model of Market Learning in the Subsidiary: The Capabilities of Exploration and Exploitation", Journal of International Marketing, 11(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.11.3.1.20157
  65. Park, Jung-Min, Jae-Eun Lee and Yun-Ho Jung (2018), "The Effect of Strategic Orientation on the Speed of Internationalization in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in South Korea", Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(5), 21-42.
  66. Podsakoff, P. M. and D. Organ (1986), "Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects", Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  67. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee and N. P. Podsakoff (2003), "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  68. Roth, K. and D. Nigh (1992), "The Effectiveness of Headquarters-subsidiary Relationships: The Role of Coordination, Control, and Conflict", Journal of Business Research, 25(4), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90025-7
  69. Schulz, M. (2001), "The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661-681. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069409
  70. Simonin, B. L. (1997), "The Importance of Collaborative Know-how: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization", Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1150-1174. https://doi.org/10.2307/256930
  71. Sinkula, J. M. (1994), "Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning", Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252249
  72. Slater, S. F. and J. C. Narver (1995), "Market Orientation and the Learning Organization", Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120
  73. Sumelius, J. and R. Sarala (2008), "Knowledge Development in MNC Subsidiaries: The Influence of MNC Internal and External Knowledge and Control Mechanisms", Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(4), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20202
  74. Szulanski, G. (1996), "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  75. Szulanski, G. (2000), "The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
  76. Werner, S. (2002), "Recent Developments in International Management Research: A Review of 20 Top Management Journals", Journal of Management, 28(3), 277-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800303
  77. White, R. E. D. and T. A. Poynter (1984), "Achieving Worldwide Advantage with the Horizontal Organization", Business Quarterly, 54(2), 55-60.
  78. Yang, Q., R. Mudambi and K. E. Meyer (2008), "Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporation", Journal of Management, 34(5), 882-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321546
  79. Zaheer, S. (1995), "Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness", Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.2307/256683