Medical Lasers

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.12-24
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2287-8300(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0224(eISSN)
대한의학레이저학회 (Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Human Fibroblast-derived Multi-peptide Factors and the Use of Energy-delivering Devices in Asian Patients

  • 투고 : 2020.05.24
  • 심사 : 2020.05.25
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Human fibroblast-derived multi-peptide factors (MPFs) have been used during treatments with energy-delivering modalities to enhance energy-induced tissue reactions. Human fibroblast-derived MPFs, which include a range of growth factors and chemoattractive factors, activate and recruit fibroblasts and endothelial cells, as well as promote extracellular matrix deposition, all of which are crucial to wound repair. Interestingly, fibroblasts from different species or anatomical sites exhibit distinct transcriptional properties with high heterogeneity. In addition, the patterns of MPF secretion can differ under a range of experimental conditions. Therefore, the use of allogeneic fibroblasts and proper cultivation thereof are necessary to obtain MPFs that can enhance the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during wound repair. Moreover, energy-delivering devices should be selected according to evidence demonstrating their therapeutic efficacy and safety on a pathological skin condition and the major target skin layers. This paper reviewed the histologic patterns of post-treatment tissue reactions elicited by several energy sources, including non-ablative and ablative fractional lasers, intense focused ultrasound, non-invasive and invasive radiofrequency, picosecond-domain lasers, and argon and nitrogen plasma. The possible role of the immediate application of human fibroblast-derived MPFs during wound repair was proposed.

키워드

과제정보

We would like to thank Sung Hun Suh (BNV Biolab, Seoul, Korea), Sunny Kang (Shenb Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), Bora Kim (Shenb Co., Ltd.), Min Choi (Shenb Co., Ltd.), Jinyoung Park (Lutronic Corp., Goyang, Korea), and Herin Lyu (Lutronic Corp.) for their assistance with technical support. We would also like to thank Anthony Thomas Milliken, ELS (Editing Synthase, Seoul, Korea) for his help with the editing of this manuscript. This research was supported by the 2019 scientific promotion program funded by Jeju National University.

참고문헌

  1. Karmisholt KE, Wenande E, Thaysen-Petersen D, Philipsen PA, Paasch U, Haedersdal M. Early intervention with non-ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring-A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels. Lasers Surg Med 2018;50:28-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22707
  2. Cho SB, Lee JH, Choi MJ, Lee KY, Oh SH. Efficacy of the fractional photothermolysis system with dynamic operating mode on acne scars and enlarged facial pores. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:108-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042728-200901000-00015
  3. Cho SB, Goo BL, Zheng Z, Yoo KH, Kang JS, Kim H. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of a 1927-nm fractionated thulium laser on pattern hair loss: an evaluator-blinded, split-scalp study. Lasers Med Sci 2018;33:851-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2437-5
  4. Stewart N, Lim AC, Lowe PM, Goodman G. Lasers and laser-like devices: part one. Australas J Dermatol 2013;54:173-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12034
  5. Orringer JS, Rittie L, Hamilton T, Karimipour DJ, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ. Intraepidermal erbium: YAG laser resurfacing: impact on the dermal matrix. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.058
  6. Cho SB, Kim JS, Zheng Z, Choi MJ, Choi IG, Oh HS, et al. Decreased tissue and serum expression of galectin-7 in patients with hypertrophic scars. Acta Derm Venereol 2013;93:669-73. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1583
  7. Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3672
  8. White WM, Makin IR, Slayton MH, Barthe PG, Gliklich R. Selective transcutaneous delivery of energy to porcine soft tissues using Intense Ultrasound (IUS). Lasers Surg Med 2008;40:67-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20613
  9. Kim HJ, Kim HG, Zheng Z, Park HJ, Yoon JH, Oh W, et al. Coagulation and ablation patterns of high-intensity focused ultrasound on a tissue-mimicking phantom and cadaveric skin. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:2251-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1804-8
  10. Kim H, Ahn KJ, Lee S, Park H, Cho SB. Interactive thermal tissue reactions of 7-MHz intense focused ultrasound and 1-MHz and 6-MHz radiofrequency on cadaveric skin. Skin Res Technol 2019;25:171-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12629
  11. Suh DH, Choi JH, Lee SJ, Jeong KH, Song KY, Shin MK. Comparative histometric analysis of the effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound and radiofrequency on skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015;17:230-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2015.1022189
  12. Na J, Zheng Z, Dannaker C, Lee SE, Kang JS, Cho SB. Electromagnetic initiation and propagation of bipolar radiofrequency tissue reactions via invasive non-insulated microneedle electrodes. Sci Rep 2015;5:16735. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16735
  13. Zheng Z, Goo B, Kim DY, Kang JS, Cho SB. Histometric analysis of skin-radiofrequency interaction using a fractionated microneedle delivery system. Dermatol Surg 2014;40:134-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12411
  14. Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Williford PM, Pearce D. Entrance and propagation pattern of high-frequency electrical currents in biological tissues as applied to fractional skin rejuvenation using penetrating electrodes. Skin Res Technol 2014;20:270-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12115
  15. Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Pearce D, Williford PM. Electrosurgery: part I. Basics and principles. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:591.e1-591.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.056
  16. Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Pearce D, Williford PM. Electrosurgery: part II. Technology, applications, and safety of electrosurgical devices. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:607.e1-607.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.055
  17. Nelson AA, Beynet D, Lask GP. A novel non-invasive radiofrequency dermal heating device for skin tightening of the face and neck. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015;17:307-12. https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2015.1039035
  18. Boisnic S, Divaris M, Branchet MC, Nelson AA. Split-face histological and biochemical evaluation of tightening efficacy using temperature- and impedance-controlled continuous non-invasive radiofrequency energy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2017;19:128-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2016.1262957
  19. Boisnic S, Divaris M, Nelson AA, Gharavi NM, Lask GP. A clinical and biological evaluation of a novel, noninvasive radiofrequency device for the long-term reduction of adipose tissue. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:94-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22223
  20. Mulholland RS, Paul MD, Chalfoun C. Noninvasive body contouring with radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryolipolysis, and low-level laser therapy. Clin Plast Surg 2011;38:503-20, vii-iii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2011.05.002
  21. Mulholland RS. Radio frequency energy for non-invasive and minimally invasive skin tightening. Clin Plast Surg 2011;38:437-48, vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2011.05.003
  22. Zhang B, Moser MAJ, Zhang EM, Luo Y, Zhang W. A new approach to feedback control of radiofrequency ablation systems for large coagulation zones. Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:367-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2016.1263365
  23. Bernstein EF, Schomacker KT, Basilavecchio LD, Plugis JM, Bhawalkar JD. Treatment of acne scarring with a novel fractionated, dual-wavelength, picosecond-domain laser incorporating a novel holographic beam-splitter. Lasers Surg Med 2017;49:796-802. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22734
  24. Varghese B, Bonito V, Jurna M, Palero J, Verhagen MH. Influence of absorption induced thermal initiation pathway on irradiance threshold for laser induced breakdown. Biomed Opt Express 2015;6:1234-40. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001234
  25. Ahn KJ, Zheng Z, Kwon TR, Kim BJ, Lee HS, Cho SB. Pattern analysis of laser-tattoo interactions for picosecond- and nanosecond-domain 1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers in tissue-mimicking phantom. Sci Rep 2017;7:1533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01724-1
  26. Lee HC, Childs J, Chung HJ, Park J, Hong J, Cho SB. Pattern analysis of 532- and 1,064-nm picosecond-domain laser-induced immediate tissue reactions in ex vivo pigmented micropig skin. Sci Rep 2019;9:4186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41021-7
  27. Chung HJ, Lee HC, Park J, Childs J, Hong J, Kim H, et al. Pattern analysis of 532- and 1064-nm microlens array-type, picosecond-domain laser-induced tissue reactions in ex vivo human skin. Lasers Med Sci 2019;34:1207-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-02711-2
  28. Kim HK, Kim HJ, Hong JY, Park J, Lee HC, Lyu H, et al. Interactive tissue reactions of 1064-nm focused picosecond-domain laser and dermal cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid treatment in in vivo rat skin. Skin Res Technol. In press 2020.
  29. Meran S, Luo DD, Simpson R, Martin J, Wells A, Steadman R, et al. Hyaluronan facilitates transforming growth factor-β1-dependent proliferation via CD44 and epidermal growth factor receptor interaction. J Biol Chem 2011;286:17618-30. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.226563
  30. Kilmer S, Semchyshyn N, Shah G, Fitzpatrick R. A pilot study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait PSR3) in full facial rejuvenation procedures. Lasers Med Sci 2007;22:101-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0431-9
  31. Elsaie ML, Kammer JN. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology for cutaneous remodeling. J Cosmet Dermatol 2008;7:309-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00411.x
  32. Kim H, Kim HJ, Kim HK, Hong JY, Cho SB. Effects of argon and nitrogen plasma pulses on the skin and skin appendages in an in vivo animal model. Skin Res Technol 2020;26:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12767
  33. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008;453:314-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07039
  34. Teo Z, Chan JSK, Chong HC, Sng MK, Choo CC, Phua GZM, et al. Angiopoietin-like 4 induces a β-catenin-mediated upregulation of ID3 in fibroblasts to reduce scar collagen expression. Sci Rep 2017;7:6303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05869-x
  35. Chong HC, Tan MJ, Philippe V, Tan SH, Tan CK, Ku CW, et al. Regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal IL-1 signaling by PPAR-beta/delta is essential for skin homeostasis and wound healing. J Cell Biol 2009;184:817-31. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200809028
  36. Lawlor KT, Kaur P. Dermal contributions to human interfollicular epidermal architecture and self-renewal. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:28098-107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226078
  37. Leary T, Jones PL, Appleby M, Blight A, Parkinson K, Stanley M. Epidermal keratinocyte self-renewal is dependent upon dermal integrity. J Invest Dermatol 1992;99:422-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12616134
  38. Tuan TL, Keller LC, Sun D, Nimni ME, Cheung D. Dermal fibroblasts activate keratinocyte outgrowth on collagen gels. J Cell Sci 1994;107(Pt 8):2285-9. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.107.8.2285
  39. Quan T, Wang F, Shao Y, Rittie L, Xia W, Orringer JS, et al. Enhancing structural support of the dermal microenvironment activates fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes in aged human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133:658-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.364
  40. Sorrell JM, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Site-matched papillary and reticular human dermal fibroblasts differ in their release of specific growth factors/cytokines and in their interaction with keratinocytes. J Cell Physiol 2004;200:134-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10474
  41. Janson D, Saintigny G, Mahe C, El Ghalbzouri A. Papillary fibroblasts differentiate into reticular fibroblasts after prolonged in vitro culture. Exp Dermatol 2013;22:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12069
  42. Janson D, Saintigny G, Zeypveld J, Mahe C, El Ghalbzouri A. TGF-β1 induces differentiation of papillary fibroblasts to reticular fibroblasts in monolayer culture but not in human skin equivalents. Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:342-8. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2014.2312
  43. Kubo K, Kuroyanagi Y. A study of cytokines released from fibroblasts in cultured dermal substitute. Artif Organs 2005;29:845-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.00138.x
  44. Chowdhury SR, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BH. Effect of supplementation of dermal fibroblasts conditioned medium on expansion of keratinocytes through enhancing attachment. Indian J Exp Biol 2012;50:332-9.
  45. Manira M, Chowdhury SR, Rosliza A, Yi Ling A, Abidah A, Vittarino J, et al. Concentration dependent effect of dermal fibroblast conditioned medium on in vitro wound healing properties of keratinocytes. Regen Res 2014;3:30-2.
  46. Maarof M, Lokanathan Y, Ruszymah HI, Saim A, Chowdhury SR. Proteomic analysis of human dermal fibroblast conditioned medium (DFCM). Protein J 2018;37:589-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-018-9800-z
  47. Ohtani T, Okamoto K, Kaminaka C, Kishi T, Sakurane M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Digital gangrene associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilia: treatment with allogeneic cultured dermal substitute (CDS). Eur J Dermatol 2004;14:168-71.
  48. Moroi Y, Fujita S, Fukagawa S, Mashino T, Goto T, Masuda T et al. Clinical evaluation of allogeneic cultured dermal substitutes for intractable skin ulcers after tumor resection. Eur J Dermatol 2004;14:172-6.
  49. Hasegawa T, Suga Y, Mizoguchi M, Ikeda S, Ogawa H, Kubo K, et al. Clinical trial of allogeneic cultured dermal substitute for the treatment of intractable skin ulcers in 3 patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:803-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.08.013
  50. Braun SA, Schrumpf H, Buhren BA, Homey B, Gerber PA. Laser-assisted drug delivery: mode of action and use in daily clinical practice. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2016;14:480-8.
  51. Haak CS, Farinelli WA, Tam J, Doukas AG, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-assisted delivery of methyl aminolevulinate: Impact of laser channel depth and incubation time. Lasers Surg Med 2012;44:787-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22102
  52. Lee WR, Shen SC, Pai MH, Yang HH, Yuan CY, Fang JY. Fractional laser as a tool to enhance the skin permeation of 5-aminolevulinic acid with minimal skin disruption: a comparison with conventional erbium:YAG laser. J Control Release 2010;145:124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.017
  53. Lim HK, Jeong KH, Kim NI, Shin MK. Nonablative fractional laser as a tool to facilitate skin penetration of 5-aminolaevulinic acid with minimal skin disruption: a preliminary study. Br J Dermatol 2014;170:1336-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12817
  54. Kim M, Kim SM, Kwon S, Park TJ, Kang HY. Senescent fibroblasts in melasma pathophysiology. Exp Dermatol 2019;28:719-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13814
  55. Yoon JE, Kim Y, Kwon S, Kim M, Kim YH, Kim JH, et al. Senescent fibroblasts drive ageing pigmentation: A potential therapeutic target for senile lentigo. Theranostics 2018;8:4620-32. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.26975
  56. Kim HJ, Kim H, Kim YK, Cho SB. Treatment of refractory melasma with microwave-generated, atmospheric-pressure, non-thermal nitrogen plasma. Med Laser 2019;8:74-9. https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2019.8.2.74