DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of the Incarnations of Two Godheads: Gucheon Sangje (Kang Jeungsan) of Daesoon Jinrihoe and Chengsheng Dadi (Emperor Huizong) of Daoism During the Northern Song

道成肉身的神格对比 - 大巡真理会九天上帝姜甑山与北宋道教长生大帝宋徽宗 -

  • Yu, Ding-ching (the Community College of the University of Hong Kong)
  • Received : 2020.10.03
  • Accepted : 2020.12.08
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

In Daesoon Jinrihoe, the Supreme God descended into the mortal world by incarnating as Kang Jeungsan to save the world from imminent disaster. Daesoon Jinrihoe is regarded by some Chinese scholars as a new Korean Daoism, and Jo Jeong-san, the Lord of the Dao in Daesoon Jinrihoe, revealed the Supreme God's name to "Gucheon Eungwon Noeseong Bohwa Cheonjon Kangseong Sangje." Comparative studies are often conducted to highlight the similarities between this god and the nearly identically named god in Chinese Daoism. However, this Chinese god is only a god of natural phenomena and has no previous connections to descension into the world via human incarnation. My research has determined that the closest basis for comparison would be Emperor Huizong within the context of Northern Song Dynasty Daoism. In the Daoism of that time period, he was understood to be the Supreme God who incarnated as a human to save the world. Borrowing Eliade's Phenomenology of Religion, this paper has discovered that core archetypes of these two godheads are different due to their different soteriological missions. In order to solve the grievances among humans, divine beings, heaven, and the afterworld, Kang Jeungsan actualized the Earthly Paradise of Later World. Drawing on the archetypal notion of an Original Time, he reshaped the world into the beginning of chaos to completely eliminate the past, and to create a fundamentally and qualitatively new era. On the other hand, Emperor Huizong tried to absorb what he viewed as heretical Buddhism into something sacred that could be used to save people from its harm. He established a hierarchy radiating from the archetypal notion of the Center of the Universe, and he cosmosized Buddhism, which he viewed as barbaric, into that order. Their core godheads mainly show differences in terms of time and space. Additionally, their extended sub-godhead symbols are quite different. Emperor Huizong, like the common supreme gods of other religions, established law of order, and then retreated as the symbol of heaven, the abdicated god. His divine power was specialized as Lin Lingsu's symbol of natural phenomena. Kang Jeungsan was completely different. He always proved his power over the three realms through different symbols. The main symbols he used were the moon for healing and resurrection, water for establishing order from chaos, and light for enabling secular individuals to experience sacred profundity.

至上神道成肉身下临凡世, 为人间拨乱反正, 在大巡真理会祂成为的姜甑山。由于大巡真理会也被中国学者视为韩国新道教, 道主赵鼎山又为姜甑山上名为「九天应元雷声普化天尊」, 中文学界常因而望文生义, 以道教的九天应元雷声普化天尊作对比研究, 然而, 中国道教神谱的九天应元雷声普化天尊只是次级的气象神, 更未道成肉身。本文发现只有宋徽宗堪与姜甑山比较, 因祂也是至上神的道成肉身, 承行降生救世的神圣使命。透过伊利亚德宗教现象学「原型」与「象征」理论, 本文发现由于救世使命的不同, 两位至上神的神格核心原型各异。姜甑山为解天地人神怨结, 开辟后天人间仙境, 以「创世原初时间原型」的核心神格, 重塑世界至混沌之初以完全消除过去, 根本性, 质变地开创新时代 ; 宋徽宗为编收异端佛教入神圣之中, 拯救人民于讹俗, 以「宇宙中心原型」建立向外幅射的等级次第, 将佛教由野蛮宇宙化为秩序。二者的核心神格, 展现了时空之异。在原型核心神格之外, 祂们的外延次级象征神格却大异其趣。宋徽宗一如普遍的至上神, 建立秩序法则后退隠为逊位神「天象征」, 祂的神力专业化为林灵素的「气象象征」 ; 姜甑山则截然不同, 祂无时无刻地以各种次级象征证明祂的三界大权, 摘其要者, 分别为治病与死而复的「月象征」,从混沌中建立秩序的「水象征」, 以及将世俗投入神圣的深刻宗教经验的「光象征」。

Keywords

References

  1. 大巡宗教文化研究所编纂, 《大巡真理会要览》, 骊州 : 大巡真理会出版部, 2012.
  2. 大巡宗教研究所, 《典经(繁体版)》, 基隆 : 大巡真理会出版部, 2012.
  3. 大巡真理会, <何谓「大巡真理」?> (http://chi.daesoon.org/app/cn/introduction/truth),2020年 9月29日.
  4. 于国庆, <大巡真理会「九天上帝」信仰与道教「普化天尊」信仰比较研究>,大巡思想学术院编,《大巡思想论总》21, 抱川 : 大真大学大巡思想学术院,2013.
  5. 不着撰人, 《太上玄灵北斗本命延生真经》, 《道藏》, 第11册,北京:文物出版社;上海:上海书店;天津:天津古籍, 1988.
  6. 不着撰人, 《灵宝无量度人上品妙经》, 《道藏》, 第1册,北京 : 文物出版社;上海 : 上海书店;天津 : 天津古籍, 1988.
  7. 王称, 《东都事略》, 台北 : 文海出版社, 1971.
  8. 刘大彬, 《茅山志》, 卷三,《道藏》, 第5册.
  9. 朱云鹏, <虔诚道徒宋徽宗>,《世界宗教文化》2, 2002.
  10. 孙亦平, 《道教在韩国》, 南京,南京大学出版社, 2016.
  11. 李远国, 《神霄雷法》, 成都 : 四川人民出版社, 2003.
  12. 李焘着,黄以周等辑补, 《续资治通鉴长编拾补》, 上海 : 上海古籍, 1986.
  13. 吴曾, 《能改斋漫录》, 上海 : 上海古籍出版社, 1979.
  14. 吴福友, <伊利亚德的宗教现象学之研究>,复旦大学博士论文, 2006.
  15. 汪藻《浮溪集》,台北 : 商务印书馆, 1965.
  16. 金春莲, <《檀君神话》蕴含的朝鲜民族文化>, 《边疆经济与文化》, 122, 2014.
  17. 金勋主编, 《中韩道教文化比较研究》, 北京 : 宗教文化出版社, 2017.
  18. 林灵素, 《金火天丁神霄三气火铃歌》, 《道藏》, 第30册, 北京 : 文物出版社;上海 : 上海书店;天津 : 天津古籍, 1988.
  19. 杨仲良编, 《皇宋通鉴长编纪事本末》, 台北 : 文海出版社, 1967.
  20. 陆游, 《老学庵笔记》, 《笔记小说大观》三编,第3册,台北 : 新兴书局, 1988.
  21. 陈均, 《九朝编年备要》, 《四库全书》, 第328册,上海 : 上海古籍出版社, 1987.
  22. 侯金全, <《典经》与《玉枢宝经》中九天应元雷声普化天尊之形象比较>, 台湾宗教学会编, 《台湾宗教研究20年的回顾与前瞻暨敬天法祖 2019国际学术研讨会论文集》, 台北 : 台湾宗教学会, 华人文化主体性研究中心, 2019.
  23. 赵与时, 《宾退录》, 《笔记小说大观》六编, 第4册, 台北 : 新兴书局, 1989.
  24. 赵佶, 《神霄玉清万寿宫诏》, 海口 : 五公祠(碑文), 1119.
  25. 赵道一, 《历世真仙体道通鉴》, 萧天石编 : 《道藏精华》 第十集, 台北 : 自由出版社, 1992.
  26. 柳存仁, 《和风堂文集》, 上海 : 上海古籍出版社, 1991.
  27. 唐代剑, <北宋神霄宫及其威仪钩稽>, 《中国道教》3, 1994.
  28. 徐松辑, 《宋会要》, 《续修四库全书》 第786册, 上海 : 上海古籍出版社, 2002.
  29. 脱脱等, 《宋史》, 台北 : 中华书局,1981.
  30. 黄日初, <「端王轻佻,不可以君天下」辨疑>, 《北京社会科学》 6, 2015.
  31. 游建西, 《道家道教史略论稿》, 北京 : 光明日报出版社, 2006.
  32. Athanasios Alexandrias, 《论道成肉身》, 石敏敏译,北京 : 生活.读书.新知三联书店, 2009.
  33. Mircea Eliade, 《宇宙与历史 : 永恒回归的神话》, 杨儒宾译, 台北 : 联经出版事业, 2000.
  34. Mircea Eliade, 《神秘主义,巫术与文化风尚》, 宋立道, 鲁奇译, 北京: 光明日报出版社, 1990.
  35. Mircea Eliade, 《神圣的存在 : 比较宗教的范型》, 晏可佳, 姚蓓琴译, 桂林 : 广西师范大学出版社, 2008.
  36. Judith M. Boltz, A Survey of Taoist Literature, Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, 1987.
  37. Kristofer Schipper and Franciscus Verellen (eds.), The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the Daozang, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
  38. Mircea Eliade, Images and Symbols, trans. P Mairet, New Jersey: Princeton, 1991.
  39. Mircea Eliade, Patterns in comparative religion. trans Sheed R, New York: Sheed & Ward, 1958.
  40. Mircea Eliade, The Myth of the Eternal Return, trans. W. R. Trask, New Jersey: Princeton, 1991.
  41. Mircea Eliade, The Scared and the Profane, trans. W. R. Trask, San Diego, New York, London: Harvest, 1987.