DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The investigation of combined ventilation-biofilter systems using recycled treated wastewater on odor reduction efficiency

  • Febrisiantosa, Andi (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agricultural and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Hong L. (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agricultural and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Renggaman, Anriansyah (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agricultural and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sudiarto, Sartika I.A. (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agricultural and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Joonhee (Institute of Livestock Environmental Management)
  • Received : 2019.10.08
  • Accepted : 2019.12.10
  • Published : 2020.07.01

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of odor abatement by using two different ventilation-biofilter systems with recycled stablized swine wastewater. Methods: The performance of odor removal efficiency was evaluated using two different ventilation-biofilter-recycled wastewater arrangements. A recirculating air-flow ventilation system connected to a vertical biofilter (M1) and a plug-flow ventilation system connected to a horizontal biofilter (M2) were installed. Water dripping over the surface of the biofilter was recycled at a flow rate of 0.83 L/h in summer and 0.58 L/h in winter to reduce odorous compounds and particulate matter (PM). The experiments were performed for 64 days with M1 and M2 to investigate how these two ventilation-biofilter systems influenced the reduction of odor compounds in the model houses. Odorous compounds, NH3 and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were analyzed, and microclimatic variables such as temperature, humidity, and PM were monitored. Results: Ammonia concentration inside M1 was about 41% higher on average than that in M2. PM and total suspended particles (TSPs) inside M1 were about 62.2% and 69.9%, respectively, higher than those in M2. TSPs in the model house were positively correlated with the concentration of NH3 and VOCs. Conclusion: M2 emitted lower concentration of odorous compounds than M1. Moreover, M2 could maintain the optimum temperature condition for a swine house during the cooler season. The plug-flow ventilation-horizontal biofilter system could be used for pig houses to minimize air pollution produced by swine farming activities and maintain optimum microclimate conditions for pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Hoff SJ, Harmon JD. Biofiltration of the critical minimum ventilation exhaust air. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality 2006; 2006 Jun 5-8; Washington DC, USA. p. 760-4.
  2. Nimmermark S. Influence of odour concentration and individual odour thresholds on the hedonic tone of odour from animal production. Biosystem Eng 2011;108:211-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.12.003
  3. Yang C, Chen H, Zeng G, Yu G, Luo S. Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration. Biotechnol Adv 2010;28:531-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv. 2010.04.002
  4. Le Leuch LM, Subrenat A, Le Cloirec P. Hydrogen sulfide adsorption and oxidation onto activated carbon cloths: applications to odorous gaseous emission treatments. Langmuir 2003;19:10869-77. https://doi.org/10.1021/la035163q
  5. Cai L, Koziel JA, Lo YC, Hoff SJ. Characterization of volatile organic compounds and odorants associated with swine barn particulate matter using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry. J Chromatogr A 2006;1102:60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.040
  6. Mielcarek P, Rzeznik W. Odor emission factors from livestock production. Pol J Environ Stud 2015;24:27-35. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/29944
  7. Dumont E, Hamon L, Lagadec S, Landrain P, Landrain B, Andres Y. $NH_{3}$ biofiltration of piggery air. J Environ Manage 2014;140:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03. 008
  8. Chung, YC, Ho KL, Tseng CP. Two-stage biofilter for effective $NH_{3}$ removal from waste gases containing high concentrations of $H_{2}S$. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007;57:337-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2007.10465332
  9. Ryu HW, Cho KS, Lee TH. Reduction of ammonia and volatile organic compounds from food waste-composting facilities using a novel anti-clogging biofilter system. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:4654-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011. 01.021
  10. Estrada JM, Kraakman NJR, Lebrero R, Munoz R. A sensitivity analysis of process design parameters, commodity prices and robustness on the economics of odour abatement technologies. Biotechnol Adv 2012;30:1354-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.010
  11. Martens W, Martinec M, Zapirain R, Stark M, Hartung E, Palmgren U. Reduction potential of microbial, odour and ammonia emissions from a pig facility by biofilters. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2001;203:335-45. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00035
  12. Sheridan B, Curran T, Dodd V, Colligan J. Biofiltration of odour and ammonia from a pig unit - A pilot-scale study. Biosyst Eng 2002;82:441-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0083
  13. Zong C, Li H, Zhang G. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from fattening pig house with two types of partial pit ventilation systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2015;208:94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.031
  14. Kumari P, Lee J, Choi HL. Characterization of odorant compounds from mechanical aerated pile composting and static aerated pile composting. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016; 29:594-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0406
  15. Ashtari AK, Majd AMS, Riskowski GL, Mukhtar S, Zhao L. Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution. Front Environ Sci Eng 2016;10:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0869-3
  16. Schauberger G, Piringer M, Petz E. Steady-state balance model to calculate the indoor climate of livestock buildings, demonstrated for finishing pigs. Int J Biometeorol 2000;43:154-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050002
  17. Lu Y, Hayes M, Stinn JP, Brown-brandl T, Xin H. Evaluating ventilation rates based on new heat and moisture production data for swine production. Trans ASABE 2017;60:237-45. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.11888
  18. Zong C, Li H, Zhang G. Airflow characteristics in a pig house with partial pit ventilation system: an experimental chamber study. 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting. ASABE - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASABE Paper No. 152172138. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim. 20152172138
  19. Tchobanoglous G, Schroeder ED. Water quality. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.; 1987.