DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Transportation Movements in Patients with Hemiparesis

  • Kim, Do-Yeong (Department of Health Science, Graduate School, Dongseo University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hoon (Department of Occupational Therapy, Dongseo University)
  • Received : 2020.02.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare unimanual, symmetrical and reciprocal movement of transportation. Nineteen participants with post-stroke hemiparesis were involved in this study. We used the Fitmeter accelerometer to measure the dependent variables: signal vector magnitude, peak acceleration and peak deceleration. With respect to the hand and arm, intensity of unimanual movement was higher than that of symmetrical movement, and reciprocal movement was greater than that of symmetrical movement. With regard to the trunk, intensity of unimanual movement was lower than that of symmetrical movement, and within bimanual movement, reciprocal movement was greater than that of symmetrical movement. In conclusion, reciprocal movement would facilitate upper extremity movement and decrease the compensatory movement of trunk more than would symmetrical movement.

Keywords

References

  1. J.H. Carr, and R.B. Shepherd, Stroke Rehabilitation : Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill (1st ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.
  2. M. Volman, A. Wijnroks, and A. Vermeer, Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis, Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 684-692, Sep. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr540oa
  3. S. Gray et al, Comparison of kinematics in skilled and unskilled arms of the same recreational baseball players, Journal of Sports Science, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 1183-1194, Nov 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500497584
  4. M. Cirstea, and M.F. Levin, Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke, Brain, Vol. 123 No. 5, pp. 940-953, May 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.5.940
  5. J.J. Chang et al, Effect of bilateral reaching on affected arm motor control in stroke-with and without loading on unaffected arm, Disability & Rehabilitation, Vol. 28 No. 24, pp. 1507-1516, Feb 2006. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280 600646060
  6. S. Messier et al, Kinematic analysis of upper limbs and trunk movement during bilateral movement after stroke, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 87, No. 11, pp. 1463-1470, Nov 2006. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.273
  7. D.Y. Kim et al, Estimating Algorithm of Physical Activity Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity Intensity using a Tri-axial Accelerometer, Journal of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of Korea, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 27-33, Dec 2011. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.12.103
  8. G. Wu, et al, International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion? Part II: Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 981-992, May 2005. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042
  9. Y. Schutz, R.L. Weinsier, and G.R. Hunter, Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: An overview of currently available and proposed new measures, Obesity Research, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 368-379, Sep 2012. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.48
  10. M. W. Vasey, and J.F. Thayer, The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution, Psychophysiology, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 479-486, July 1987. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00324.x
  11. P.N. Grimshaw et al, The 3-dimensional kinematics of the walking gait cycle of children aged between 10 and 24 months: cross sectional and repeated measures, Gait & Posture, Vol. 7m No. 1, pp. 7-15, Jan 1998. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(97)00025-8
  12. I. Holmer, Propulsive efficiency of breaststroke and freestyle swimming, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 95-103, June 1974. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449511
  13. M.P. Malcolm, C. Massie, and M. Thaut, Rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching movements: a pilot study, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 69-79, 2009. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1601-69
  14. A. Shumway-Cook, and M.H. Woollacott, Motor control : Translating Research into Clinical Practice (3rd ed.), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
  15. A.S. Majumdar, and R.A. Robergs, The Science of Speed: Determinants of Performance in the 100 m Sprint, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 479-494, Sep 2011. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.6.3.479
  16. S. Park, and D. Jang, Continuous modulation of muscle activation patterns during goal-directed movements, International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 94-101, Apr 2012.
  17. E.A. Franz, Attentional distribution of task parameters to the two hands during bimanual performance of right- and left-handers, Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 71-81, 2004. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.1.71-81
  18. V. L. Gray, T.D. Ivanova, and S.J. Garland, Control of fast squatting movements after stroke, Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 123, No. 2, pp. 344-350, Feb 2012. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.003
  19. P.L. Gribble et al, Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy, Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 2396-2405, May 2003. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01020.2002
  20. T. Platz, S. Bock, and K. Prass, Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study, Neuropsychologia, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 687-698, 2001. DOI : https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0028-3932(01)00005-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00005-7
  21. E. Milner, Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction, Experimental brain research, Vol. 143, No. 4, pp. 406-416, Feb 2002. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1001-4
  22. T.E. Milner, and C. Cloutier, Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement, Experimental brain research, Vol. 122, No. 3, pp. 309-317, Sep 1998. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050519