DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Self-related Postpartum Body Evaluation by Maternal Age and Delivery Method

출산 후 산모들의 주관적인 신체 평가에 대한 연령과 분만방식에 따른 분석

  • Ha, Su-Jin (Dept. of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hwang, Deok-Sang (Dept. of Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Moo (Dept. of Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jang, Jun-Bock (Dept. of Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Hoon (Dept. of Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 하수진 (경희대학교 대학원 임상한의학과) ;
  • 황덕상 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 이진무 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 장준복 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 이창훈 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실)
  • Received : 2020.04.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.29
  • Published : 2020.05.29

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare postpartum symptoms of 528 women by age groups and delivery method through health questionnaires of postpartum care center. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2018, we statistically compared the 528 women's postpartal symptoms who divided into 4 age groups using SPSS Statistics 21.0 program. Results: There were no differences in weight changes, gestational age and degree of subjective discomfort by age (p>.05). On the other hand, parity, fetal weight and delivery method were statistically associated with age (p<.05). Especially the rate of cesarean delivery was increased with age. Degree of feeling dyspepsia and edema was higher in cesarean section delivery group (p<.05). Also, as the weight increased by 1 kg during pregnancy, the degree of feeling postnatal edema increased by 0.204 (β=0.204, t=4.204, p<.05). Conclusion: This study showed that age itself will not affect postpartum symptoms alone. Instead it is necessary to consider post-cesarean delivery symptoms for advanced maternal age.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean National Statistical Office, The Statistics of Marriage and Divorce, 2018[cited April 2, 2020]. Available from:URL:http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=373728&pageNo=29&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&searchInfo=&sTarget=title&sTxt=
  2. Korean National Statistical Office, Preliminary Result Statistics of Birth and Death. 2018[cited April 2, 2020]. Available from:URL: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=373361&pageNo=30&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&searchInfo=&sTarget=title&sTxt=
  3. The society of Korean medicine obstetrics and gynecology. Oriental obstetrics & gynecology. Seoul:Euiseongdang. 2012:765-7.
  4. Hwang JY. What is problem in maternity care system, Korea. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2018(1):9-23. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2020.24.1.9
  5. Barkan SE, Bracken MB. Delayed childbearing: no evidence for increased risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125(1):101-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114491
  6. Ataullah I, Freeman-Wnag T, The older obstetric patient, Current Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;15(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curobgyn.2004.09.006
  7. Choi JH, et al. Meta analysis of clinical studies of pregnancy and delivery ih elderly gravida. Korean Journal of Obesterics & Gynecology. 2006;49(2):293-308.
  8. Kim DS, et al. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Korea: a comprehensive approach to prenatal care. Seoul:Korean Women's Development Institute. 2011.
  9. Mills TA, Lavender T. Advaced maternal age. Obsterics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2011;21(4):107-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2010.12.003
  10. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A study on efficient management of high risk pregnanat women in Korea. 2005 December[cited May 8, 2020]. Available from:URL:http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/commons/util/ndslOriginalView.do?dbt=TRKO&cn=TRKO200600002308&rn=&url=&pageCode=PG18
  11. Montan S. Increased risk in elderly parturient, Current Opinion in Obsterics & Gynecology. 2007;19(2):110-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280825603
  12. Park HJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women aged 35 and older. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;49(10):2066-74.
  13. Ales K, Druzin M, Santibi D. Impact of advanced maternal age on the outcome of pregnancy. Surgery, Gynecology & Obsterics. 1990;171(3):209-16.
  14. Edge V, Laros RK. Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women aged 35 or older. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1881-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90706-O
  15. Bianco A, et al. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(6):917-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2
  16. Cnattingius S, Forman M, Michele R. Delayed childbearing and risk of adverse perinatal outcome. JAMA. 1992;268(7):886-90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490070068044
  17. Prysak M, Lorenz R, Kisly A. Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women 35 years and older. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;85(1):65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00330-G
  18. Jang SW, Heo SJ, Cho HJ. An Investigation in the State of Doctor's Linkage and Oriental Medical Treatment at All Postpartum Care Center in Seoul. The Journal of Oriental Obsterics & Gynecology. 2011;24(4):174-85.
  19. Wang HJ, Park HS, Kim IO. Comparison of Prenatal Health Management State and Educational Needs for Pregnant Women with Advanced Maternal Age and Under the Age of 35. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013;19(4):230-41. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.230
  20. Lee CH, et al. A Study on the Factors related with the Occurrence of Postpartal Symptoms. The Journal of Oriental Obsterics & Gynecology. 2002;15(3):90-6.
  21. Choi SR, et al. A Clinical Study of Pregnanacy and Delivery in Women Aged 40 years and Older. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2003;46(3):612-6.
  22. Song HS, et al. An Analysis on the Characteristics of Hospital Admission and Discharge for Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section and Their Medical Expenses-With Special Focus on Health Insurnace Review Assessment Data, 2009-2011. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2015;19(1):82-94. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2015.19.1.82
  23. Ryu JW, et al. The Pros and Cons of Different Modes of Delivery at a Single Institution. 2011;54(6):279-85. https://doi.org/10.5468/KJOG.2011.54.6.279
  24. Cunningham FG, et al. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. In:Cunnigham FG, Leveno KL, Bloom SL, editors. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York(NY):McGraw-Hill. 2010:544-64.
  25. Sanchez-Ledesma MJ, et al. A Comparison of three antiemetic combinations for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1590-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200212000-00022