DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기부대양여 사업에 의한 군사시설 이전의 리스크 요인 도출 및 우선순위 평가

Risk Identification and Priority Evaluation of Military Facility Relocation by Endowment and Concession Project

  • 김국주 (육군사관학교 토목환경학과) ;
  • 안성진 (목포국립대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 박영준 (육군사관학교 토목환경학과)
  • Kim, Kukjoo (Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy) ;
  • Ahn, Sungjin (Department of Architectural Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Park, Youngjun (Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.10
  • 심사 : 2020.03.27
  • 발행 : 2020.05.31

초록

군부대 이전사업의 소요 증가에 따라 활용되어온 기부대양여방식이 사업시행에 있어 관련제도와 법규, 사업시행자와 군 부대간의 상호이해의 부족 등의 이유로 대다수의 사업이 지연되고 있으며 개선이 요구되고 있는 상황이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 이전사업 추진 단계별 잠재적 리크스 요인 즉, 사업특성과 시행에 제약이 되는 문제를 확인하고 우선순위를 도출하여 위험요인을 분석하고자 하였다. 도출된 위험요인들 중 인허가 및 설계 단계에서의 시설기준을 초과한 요구, 사업승인 단계의 부대이전반대, 시공 및 준공단계의 시공 중 설계변경, 재산 처리단계의 기부/양여 재산에 대한 이견, 합의각서 체결단계의 시설기준의 부재가 우선적인 리스크 관리 고려대상으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 리스크 관리의 우선순위를 제공함으로써 사업관리자가 더욱 효울적으로 사업을 추진할 있는 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The endowment and concession has been put to practical use for the relocation projects of military Facilities. Yet, in terms of the project implementation, delay of a great deal of the projects is occurring due to related regulations and standards, as well as a lack of mutual understanding between project implementers and military units. This study analyzes the risk factors by identifying and prioritizing the potential risk factors at each stage of project implementation such as the issues that limit project characteristics and implementation. Among the derived risk factors, request exceeding facility standards in the licensing and design phases, opposition to troop relocation in the project approval phase, design change during construction phase in the construction and completion phases, dissenting opinions on endowed/conceded property in the property disposal phase and absence of facility standards in the MOA conclusion phase were found to be the main object of consideration in risk management. This study is expected to provide project managers with a guideline for effectively pursuing the projects, as it provides prioritization and optimization of risk management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aleshin, A., and Dworatsch, S. (1997). "Risk Management of Joint Venture Construction Projects of Foreign Cooperation in Russia." PMI 28th Annual Seminars and Symposium, PMI, pp. 221-226.
  2. Dalkey, N.C. (1981). "The Delphi method; An experimental study of group opinion." The Rand Corp., RM-5882-PR.
  3. Eun, J.H. (2011). "Military Bases Siting Conflict Analysis: Study of Contrasting Cases Through Discourse Analysis." Korean Public Administration Review, 45(4), pp. 55-84.
  4. Jaafari, A. (1994). "Total Project Risk management Aided by Information Systems." 12th Internet World Congress on Project Management, Proceedings, 2, pp. 311-317.
  5. Kang, K.H., and Park, H.Y. (2011). "A Study on the Relocation of Military Facilities in Urban Areas - Focused on Pyeongtaek Base Construction Project for Yongsan Base Relocation." Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association, 24(4), pp. 315-343.
  6. Kim H.J., Kim, I.H., and Woo, M.J. (2009). "A Study on the Policies for Military Base Relocation and Redevelopment Focusing on the Cases in the United States, Germany, Japan and Korea." The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 18(4), pp. 401-429.
  7. Kim, M.H. (2011). "An Analysis on Structures and the Actions of Public Conflicts: Focusing on the Relocation of military facilities." Journal of Local Government Studis, 23(2), pp. 65-74.
  8. Lee, B.I., and Kim, Y.H. (2009). "Conflicts over Military Facilities and Strategies for Their Resolution." Korean Journal of Public Administration, 47(4), pp. 163-191.
  9. Lee, K.H. (2013). "Assessment of Delays in the Military Facility Relocation Projects and Improvement Plan" Ph.D. Dissertation, Dongguk Univ., Seoul, South Korea. pp. 56-57.
  10. Moon, I.S. (2011). "A Study on NIMBYism and Conflicts in the Relocation of K-2 Air Base." Korea Real Estate Society, 29(2), pp. 103-127.
  11. Mootanah, D.P. (1997). "A Holistic Framework for Managing Risks in Construction Projects." PMI 28th Annual Seminars and Symposium, PMI, pp. 1056-1062.
  12. Saaty, T.L. (2008). "Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process." International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008;1(1). pp. 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  13. Shin K.S., and Kim, H.J. (2013). "Defense and military facilities the previous business component research on the impact on residents satisfaction." The Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 8(1), pp. 143-148. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2013.8.1.143
  14. Shin K.S., Kim, H.J., and Kim, D.H. (2012). "Relocation of troops to the preferences of the key factors study." The Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 7(6), pp. 1499-1504. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2012.7.6.1499
  15. Wong, J.K., and Li, H. (2008). "Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) in Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Intelligent Building System." Building and Environment, 43(1), pp. 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019
  16. Yun, J.R., Kim, H.J., and Yuh, O.K. (2017). "A Study on the Improvement of Endowment & Concession Project of National Land through Case Analysis." The Geographical Journal of Korea, 51(1), pp. 23-32.