References
- AAAS Commission on Science Education (1961). Science teaching in elementary and junior high schools. Science, 133, 2019-2024. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3469.2019
- AAAS Commission on Science Education (1971). The AAAS project: Science-A Process Approach. In E. Victor & M. S. Lerner (Ed.), Readings in science education for the elementary school (2nd ed., pp. 451-462). New York: The Macmillan Company.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1967). Science-A Process Approach, Part A, Description of the program. New York: Xerox.
- Ault, C. R. Jr. (2015). Challenging science standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ault, C. R. Jr., & Dodick J. (2010). Tracking the footprints puzzle: The problematic persistence of science-as-process in teaching the nature and culture of science. Science Education, 94, 1092-1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20398
- Ausubel, D. P. (1964/1969). Some psychological and educational limitations of learning by discovery. In H. O. Andersen (Ed.), Readings in science education for the secondary school (pp. 97-113). London, UK: The Macmillan Company.
- Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004499
- Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms: Understanding a framework for K-12 Education. Science Teacher, 78(9), 34-40.
- Chang, H. (2014). Epistemic activities and systems of practice: Unit of analysis in philosophy of science after the practice turn. In L. Soler, S. Zwart, M. Lynch, & V. Israel-Jost (Eds), Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science (pp. 67-79). New York, NY: Routledge.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Erduran, S. (2015). Introduction to the focus on scientific practices. Science Education, 99(6), 1023-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21192
- Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
- Fields, D. (1996). The impact of Gagne's theories on practices. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 794)
- Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200105
- Ford, M. (2008). 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17, 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
- Ford, M. (2015). Educational implications of choosing "practice" to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
- Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001001
- Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of "hands-on" and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488
- Gagne, R. M. (1965). Psychological issues in Science-A Process Approach. AAAS Commission on Science Education (Ed.), The psychological bases of Science-A Process Approach (pp. 1-8). Washington, D.C.: The Commission.
- Gagne, R. M. (1966a). Elementary science: A new scheme of instruction. Science, 151(3706), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3706.49
- Gagne, R. M. (1966b). Varieties of learning and the concept of discovery. In L. S. Shulman & E. R. Keislar (Eds.), Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal (pp. 135-150). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Gagne, R. M. (1973). Learning and instructional sequence. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (pp. 3-33). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
- Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21098
- Ha, H., & Kim, H.-B. (2017). Exploring responsive teaching's effect on students' epistemological framing in small group argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0063
- Heo, J., & Lee, K. (2018). A proposal of curriculum and teaching sequence for seasonal change by exploring a learning progression. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 39(3), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.3.260
- Hodson, D. (1986). Rethinking the role and status of observation in science education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027860180403
- Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280201
- Hodson, D. (1998). Science fiction: The continuing mispresentation of science in the school curriculum. Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369800200033
- Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science. Science & Education, 20, 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4
- Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999-1021). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Kim, Y.-C. (2016). Qualitative research methodology I (3rd ed.). Paju: Academy Press.
- Kirschner, P. A. (1992). Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Science & Education, 1, 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430277
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquirybased teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
- Livermore, A. H. (1966). AAAS Commission on science education: Elementary science program. Journal of Chemical Education, 43, 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed043p270
- Millar, R. (1989). What is 'scientific method' and can it be taught? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Skills and processes in science education: A critical analysis (pp. 47-62). London, UK: Routledge.
- Millar, R. (1991). A means to an end: The role of processes in science education. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science (pp. 43-52). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
- Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: What practical work in science education is really for. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 16-31) London, UK: Routledge.
- Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559938
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Norris, S. P. (1985). The philosophical basis of observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(9), 817-833. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220905
- Oh, P. S. (2015). A theoretical review and trial application of the 'resources-based view' (RBV) as an alternative cognitive theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 971-984. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.0971
- Oh, P. S. (2018). An exploratory study of the ‘method of multiple working hypotheses' as a method of earth scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 39(5), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.5.501
- Oh, P. S. (2019). Features of modeling-based abductive reasoning as a disciplinary practice of inquiry in earth science: Cases of novice students solving a geological problem. Science & Education, 28, 731-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00058-w
- Oh, J., & Oh, P. S. (2017). An exploration of the possibility of implementing 'responsive teaching' (RT) in elementary science curriculum. Journal of Koran Elementary Science Education, 36(3), 227-245.
- Osborne, J. (1998). Science education without a laboratory? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 156-175). London, UK: Routledge.
- Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
- Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understanding its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Sanderson, B. A., & Kratochvil, D. W. (1971). Science-A Process Approach, product development report no. 8. Washington, D.C.: Office of Program Planning and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 064 066)
- Sears, P. B., & Kessen, W. (1964). Statement of purposes and objectives of science education in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020104
- Soler, L., Zwart, S., Lynch, M., & Israel-Jost, V. (2014). Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing "science practice" in learning setting. Science Education, 99(6), 1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21191
- The Ministry of Education (1992). High school curriculum (I). Seoul: The Ministry of Education.
- The Ministry of Education (2014). Science 3-1. Seoul: Mirae-N.
- The Ministry of Education (2015). Science curriculum. Sejong: The Ministry of Education.
- The Ministry of Education (2018a). Science 3-1 teachers' guide. Seoul: Visang.
- The Ministry of Education (2018b). Science 3-1. Seoul: Visang.
- Wellington, J. J. (1981). ‘What's supposed to happen, sir?' Some problems with discovery learning. School Science Review, 63(222), 167-173.
- Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for a re-appraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3-15). London, UK: Routledge.
- Wideen, M. F. (1975). Comparison of student outcomes for Science-A Process approach and traditional science teaching for third, fourth, fifth, and sixth grade classes: A product evaluation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660120106
Cited by
- 2015 개정 교육과정 '과학탐구실험' 평가 도구 및 평가 현황 탐색 vol.40, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.5.515
- 학문, 교과, 교과내용, 교과교육 간 관계에 대한 비판적 고찰 -과학교육을 중심으로- vol.40, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.6.671
- 행성 궤도의 모양에 관한 중학교 영재 학생들의 증거 기반 추론 vol.42, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2021.42.1.118
- 과학 탐구 수업에서 초등학생들이 바라는 과학 교사의 모습에 대한 요인 분석 vol.40, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.3.366