Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Cognitive Characteristics of Landscape Resources of Je-ju Local Stone Culture - Focusing on the Comparison between Korea and China -

제주(濟州) 향토(鄕土) 돌문화경관(景觀)자원의 인지적 특성 분석 - 한·중 비교를 중심으로 -

  • Lim, Jin-Kang (Dept. of Architecture ＆)
  • 임진강 (고구려대학교 건축조경과)
  • Received : 2020.02.10
  • Accepted : 2020.03.06
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a basic study of the stone cultural landscape resources of Jeju Island with the value of world heritage. It has the ultimate purpose of providing basic resources for the advantages of various Jeju local resources and future conservation and management. Literature research and field survey were conducted to derive the landscape characteristics of Jeju stone cultural resources. and Research for recognition of stone cultural resources and image analysis were performed in parallel. Accordingly I would like to consider the recognition of the Jeju stone cultural landscape held by Korean and Chinese. As a result of the research, Stone is a typical local resource in Jeju, and the greatest feature of the stone was its natural nature. and In the image of the cultural resources of stone, he highly appreciated the image of "Harmonious", "Attractive" and "Unaffected". Recognized Field walls as "Beautiful" and Dolhareubang as "Familiar". And the most preferred stone cultural resources in Korea and China are surveyed in order of Field walls and Dolhareubang, and you can see that there is a difference between them in the evaluation.

본 연구는 세계적 유산 가치를 지닌 제주도 돌문화경관자원에 대한 기초적 조사로써 다양한 제주 향토자원의 우수성과 앞으로의 보전 및 관리를 위한 기초적 자료 제공에 궁극적 목적이 있다. 제주 돌문화자원의 경관적 특성을 도출하고자 문헌연구와 함께 현장조사를 실시하였고, 돌문화자원에 대한 인식 및 이미지 분석을 위해 설문조사를 병행하였다. 이에 한·중국인이 가지는 있는 제주돌문화경관의 인식에 대하여 고찰하고자 한다. 연구 결과, 제주의 대표적 향토자원은 돌이고, 그것의 큰 특징은 자연성으로 조사되었다. 그리고 돌문화자원의 이미지에 있어 "조화로운", "매력적인", "자연스러운" 이미지를 높게 평가하였고, 밭담을 "아름다운", 돌하르방을 "친근한" 등으로 인식하고 있었다. 그리고 한·중인이 가장 선호하는 돌문화자원은 밭담과 돌하르방 순으로 조사되었으며, 선호도에는 서로 차이가 존재하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, H. L.(2017). Spatial Analysis of the Confucian Cultural Landscapes at Jeongeuihyanggyo, Jeju Island. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 35(4): 29-42. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2017.35.4.029
  2. Lim, J. K., Min, B. W. and Kim, D. C.(2017). A Study on the Importance about Stone Cultural Landscape Resources in Jeju using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) Method : Focused on the Comparison between Korea and China. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 45(1): 16-27. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.1.016
  3. Lee, H. L.(2015). A Study on the Confucian Cultural Landscape of Daejeonghyanggyo at Jeju Island. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 13(-): 17-33.
  4. Kim, S. B. and Park, T. H.(2011). A Study of Use and Symbolism of Dongjaseok Seen from Components of Jeju Graveyard Landscape. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 9(2): 143-153.
  5. Kang, S. G.(2011). A Study on the Significance of the Field Walls on Jeju Island as the Cultural Landscape. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 21(3): 223-233. https://doi.org/10.35149/jakpg.2011.21.3.017
  6. Lee, S. W. and Kim, M. K. .(2012). Study on Height of Stony Walls in Coastal Villages of Jeju Island. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. : 47(3): 390-406.
  7. Ban, Y. U., Lee, T. H., Baek, J. I. and Kim, M. A.(2012). Selecting Representative Landscape Adjectives in Accordance with Landscape Units and Space Types. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 15(2): 95-101. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2012.15.1.95
  8. Ryu, J. S.(2012). A Study on the Extraction of Vocabulary and Image Analysis for Evaluating Urban and Rural Landscape. Master thesis of Chungnam University Graduate School.
  9. Seung, J. H.(2010). Visual Landscape Assessment Model Development for Agricultural Production Landscapes. Doctoral thesis of Kyunghee University Graduate School.
  10. Yoo, N. H., Ban, T. U., Baek, J. I., Kim, Y. M. and Yu, H. S.(2009). Participatory Selecting Representative Landscape Adjectives Through Factor Analysis. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 26(2): 153-155
  11. Kim, Y. M., Yoo, N. H., Ban, T. U., Baek, J. I. and Yu, H. S.(2009). Resident-Participatory Landscape Adjectives for Evaluation about Rural Landscape Status Quo. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea :Autumn Conference Abstract. pp. 645-653.
  12. Lee, B. Y.(2004). A Study on the evaluation indices for the visual analysis of rural landscape. Master thesis of Seoul University Graduate School.
  13. Joo, S. H. and Im, S. B.(2003). A Study on the Landscape Adjectives for Urban Landscape Analysis. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 31(1): 1-10.
  14. Kim, S. H.(Author) Kim, H. D.(Translator)(1992). NamSaRok(南槎錄). Seoul: Young Ga Publisher.
  15. Deeo Rooted Tree Publishing House(1989). The Discovery of Korea. Seoul: Deeo Rooted Tree Publishing House.
  16. Oh, C. W. and Park, C. S.(1991). Geography and Custom of Our Country. North Korea: Geumseong Youth Publisher.
  17. Cheju-do(Korea). Ministry of Culture and Sports(1997). Jeju Folk Ruins. Jeju: Cheju-do.
  18. Cheju-do(Korea)(1985). Legendary land of Jeju Island. Jeju: Cheju-do.
  19. Woo, G. S.(2002). Cave. Seoul: jisungsa