DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conceptual design of a high neutron flux research reactor core with low enriched uranium fuel and low plutonium production

  • Rahimi, Ghasem (Department of Nuclear Engineering, School of Mechanical Eng., Shiraz University) ;
  • Nematollahi, MohammadReza (Department of Nuclear Engineering, School of Mechanical Eng., Shiraz University) ;
  • Hadad, Kamal (Department of Nuclear Engineering, School of Mechanical Eng., Shiraz University) ;
  • Rabiee, Ataollah (Department of Nuclear Engineering, School of Mechanical Eng., Shiraz University)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.19
  • 심사 : 2019.09.05
  • 발행 : 2020.03.25

초록

Research reactors for radioisotope production, fuel and material testing and research activities are designed, constructed and operated based on the society's needs. In this study, neutronic and thermal hydraulic design of a high neutron flux research reactor core for radioisotope production is presented. Main parameters including core excess reactivity, reactivity variations, power and flux distribution during the cycle, axial and radial power peaking factors (PPF), Pu239 production and minimum DNBR are calculated by nuclear deterministic codes. Core calculations performed by deterministic codes are validated with Monte Carlo code. Comparison of the neutronic parameters obtained from deterministic and Monte Carlo codes indicates good agreement. Finally, subchannel analysis performed for the hot channel to evaluate the maximum fuel and clad temperatures. The results show that the average thermal neutron flux at the beginning of cycle (BOC) is 1.0811 × 1014 n/㎠-s and at the end of cycle (EOC) is 1.229 × 1014 n/㎠-s. Total Plutonium (Pu239) production at the EOC evaluated to be 0.9487 Kg with 83.64% grade when LEU (UO2 with 3.7% enrichment) used as fuel. This designed reactor which uses LEU fuel and has high neutron flux and low plutonium production could be used for peaceful nuclear activities based on nuclear non-proliferation treaty concepts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. L.E. Link, et al., Argonne High-Flux Research Reactor-AHFR Conceptual Design Study, Argonne National Laboratory and University of Chicago., 1959.
  2. R.D. Cheverton, T.M. Sims, "HFIR Core Nuclear Design," ORNL-4621, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1971.
  3. Arne P. Olson, Very-high-flux research reactor concepts, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 249 (77-90) (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(86)90244-5
  4. P.H. Liem, H. Sekimoto, Neutronic and thermal hydraulic design of the graphite moderated helium-cooled high flux reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 139 (221-233) (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(93)90158-6
  5. V.K. Raina, et al., Multi-purpose research reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (770-783) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.022
  6. C.G. Seo, et al., Conceptual Core Design of a 20 MWResearch Reactor Using the HANARO Fuel Assembly, Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Chuncheon, Korea, 2006.
  7. R.T. Primm III, et al., Design Study for a Low-Enriched Uranium Core for the High Flux Isotope Reactor, Annual Report for FY, 2007, p. 2007.
  8. F.E. Teruel, Rizwan-uddin, An innovative research reactor design, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (395-407) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.10.025
  9. S.B. Chafle, et al., High Flux Research Reactor, Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, 2009.
  10. C.G. Seo, N.Z. Cho, A core design concept for multi-purpose, Nucl. Eng. Des. 252 (34-41) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.031
  11. L.P. Foyto, et al., The University of Missouri Research Reactor HEU to LEU Fuel Conversion Project Status, 2013.
  12. A. Bergeron, et al., "Low Enriched Uranium Core Design for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR) with Un-finned 12 Mil-Thick Clad UMo Monolithic Fuel", ANL/GTRI/TM-13/15, Argonne National Laboratory, 2013.
  13. E.E. Feldman, et al., "Technical Basis in Support of the Conversion of the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) Core from Highly-Enriched to Low Enriched Uranium-Steady-State Thermal Hydraulic Analysis" ANL/RERTR/TM-12-37 REV, vol. 1, 2013.
  14. R. Vignolo, et al., "Conceptual Design of a Compact Nuclear Reactor Core" Conference Paper, IGORR Conference, 2014.
  15. D.J. Diamond, et al., "Conversion Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the NIST Research Reactor", BNL-107265-2015-IR, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2014.
  16. Z. Wu, "A Research Reactor Core Design for Advanced Neutron Source" Proceeding of the 2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE25, 2017. Shanghai, China-ICONE 25-67573.
  17. B.R. Betzler, et al., High-Fidelity Modeling and Simulation for a High Flux Isotope Reactor Low-Enriched Uranium Core Design, 2017.
  18. M.D. Dehart, et al., Fuel Element Design and Analysis for Potential LEU Conversion of the Advanced Test Reactor, 2017.
  19. J.R. Askew, F.J. Fayers, P.B. Kemshell, General description of the lattice code WIMS, Atomic Energy Establ. Winfrith, Eng. (1966).
  20. T.B. Flower, et al., "Nuclear Reactor Core Analysis Code: CITATION" ORNL-TM-2496, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1971.
  21. D. Basile, et al., "COBRA-EN: an Upgraded Version of the COBRA-C/MIT Code for Thermal-Hydraulic Transient Analysis of Light Water Reactor Fuel Assemblies and Cores" Report 1010/1, ENEL CRTN, Milano, 1999.
  22. Groenveld, et al., The 2006 CHF look-up table, Nucl. Eng. Des. 237 (2007) 1909-1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.014
  23. "Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 4 (Reactor) for Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant" by Joint-Stock Association, ATOMSTPOYEXPORT, Moscow, 2007.
  24. D.B. Pelowitz, MCNPXTM User's Manual Version 2.6.0, LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, 2008.
  25. M.H. Porhemmat, K. Hadad, F. Faghihi, PARCS cross-section library generator; part one: development and verification, Prog. Nucl. Energy 78 (2015) 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.08.008
  26. M.H. Porhemmat, K. Hadad, M. Mahzoon, Modular ray tracing in 2D whole core transport with MOC, Prog. Nucl. Energy 99 (2017) 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.005
  27. M.H. Porhemmat, K. Hadad, S. Dulla, P. Ravetto, Verification and validation of the modular ray tracing MOC using the coupled forward-adjoint approach and application to C5G7 benchmark, Ann. Nucl. Energy 129 (2019) 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.041
  28. H.J. Kretzschmar, W. Wagner, International Steam Tables Properties of Water and Steam Based on the Industrial Formulation IAPWS-IF97, third ed., 2018.
  29. Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Nonpower Reactors, Standard Review Plan and Acceptance Criteria, 1996. U.S. NRC, NUREG-1537, part 2.

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of semi-heavy water and H2O as coolant for a conceptual research reactor from the view point of neutronic parameters vol.118, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103126
  2. The development of fuel management code TRACS for HFETR based on Unstructured-mesh variational nodal method vol.166, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108807