Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction: Surgical outcomes from a multicenter study

  • Soumian, Soni (Department of Breast and General Surgery, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust) ;
  • Parmeshwar, Rishikesh (Department of Breast and General Surgery, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust) ;
  • Chandarana, Mihir (Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital NHS Trust) ;
  • Marla, Sekhar (Department of Breast and General Surgery, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust) ;
  • Narayanan, Sankaran (Department of Breast and General Surgery, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust) ;
  • Shetty, Geeta (Department of Breast and General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust)
  • Received : 2019.09.03
  • Accepted : 2020.01.28
  • Published : 2020.03.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Perforator artery flaps based on the branches of intercostal arteries and lateral thoracic artery can be used for reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Although described more than a decade ago, these have not been adopted widely in clinical practice. We report on short-term and long-term surgical outcomes of partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps from a prospective multicenter audit. Methods All patients operated for BCS and partial breast reconstruction using intercostal artery perforator or lateral thoracic artery perforator flaps from January 2015 to October 2018 were included in the analysis. Oncoplastic breast surgeons with appropriate level of training performed all tumor excisions and reconstructions as a single-stage procedure. Patient characteristics, treatment details and surgical outcomes were noted. Specific outcomes recorded were margin re-excision and complication rates. Results One hundred and twelve patients underwent the procedure in the given study period. The median age was 54 years. Median specimen weight was 62.5 g and median volume of excision was 121.4 mL. Fifteen patients (13.39%) underwent a margin re-excision for close or positive margins without additional morbidity. One patient required a completion mastectomy. Eight patients (7.14%) had an early complication. None of the patients required a contralateral symmetrization procedure. The results were comparable across the participating centers. Conclusions Chest wall artery perforator-based flaps are an excellent option for lateral and inferior quadrant partial breast reconstructions. The short and long-term surgical outcomes are comparable across sites and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Patient-reported outcome measures need to be studied.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen JY, Huang YJ, Zhang LL, et al. Comparison of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and breast-conserving surgery alone: a meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer 2018;21:321-9. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e36
  2. Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 2012;345:e4505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4505
  3. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1375-91. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y
  4. Adams WP Jr, Lipschitz AH, Ansari M, et al. Functional donor site morbidity following latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:6-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000106430.56501.b5
  5. Lee KT, Mun GH. A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:303-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000365
  6. Smith SL. Functional morbidity following latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. J Adv Pract Oncol 2014;5:181-7.
  7. Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003;30:331-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00034-8
  8. Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, et al. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1529-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98a6c
  9. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B, et al. The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:644-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.006
  10. Hamdi M, De Frene B. Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2006;20:73-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-941713
  11. Hamdi M, Spano A, Van Landuyt K, et al. The lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and clinical application in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121: 389-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000298317.65296.cf
  12. McCulley SJ, Schaverien MV, Tan VK, et al. Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:686-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.01.008
  13. Hamdi M. Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Breast 2013;22 Suppl 2:S100-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.019
  14. Roy PG. One-stage vs. two-stage approach for partial breast reconstruction with lateral chest wall perforator flaps. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2016;9:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2016.06.003
  15. Roy PG, Tenovici AA. Staged approach to partial breast reconstruction to avoid mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Gland Surg 2017;6:336-42. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.03.08
  16. Carrasco-Lopez C, Julian Ibanez JF, Vila J, et al. Anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in immediate breast reconstruction: anatomical study and clinical application. Microsurgery 2017;37:603-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30171
  17. Kim JB, Kim DK, Lee JW, et al. The usefulness of pedicled perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction after breast conserving surgery in Korean women. Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45:29-36. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01200
  18. Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW, et al. Usefulness of oncoplastic volume replacement techniques after breast conserving surgery in small to moderate-sized breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:489-96. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.489
  19. Macmillan RD, McCulley SJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: what, when and for whom? Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2016; 8:112-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-016-0212-9
  20. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Gemperli R. Oncoplastic breast surgery: indications, techniques and perspectives. Gland Surg 2013;2:143-57.
  21. Levine JL, Soueid NE, Allen RJ. Algorithm for autologous breast reconstruction for partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:762-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000176892.38430.8a
  22. Ho W, Stallard S, Doughty J, et al. Oncological outcomes and complications after volume replacement oncoplastic breast conservations: the Glasgow experience. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2016;10:223-8.

Cited by

  1. Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Conserving Surgery: A Review vol.8, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-020-00256-4
  2. Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Lear vol.13, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s321192
  3. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcer: various flaps and other surgical methods vol.64, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.34
  4. Volume replacement techniques in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery vol.34, pp.suppl1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2021.10.002
  5. A Multicentric Prospective Cohort Study of Modified Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap in Partial Breast Reconstruction vol.88, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002838