DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Salvage of late flap compromise in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: To revise or not to revise

  • Hong, Seung Heon (Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyeong-Tae (Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pyon, Jai-Kyong (Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.11.01
  • Accepted : 2019.12.14
  • Published : 2020.01.15

Abstract

Although the success rate of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps has increased, late flap failures still occur and have a low salvage rate. The present article describes a case of salvage of a case of late flap failure using the pedicle vein as a vein graft source. A 50-yearold woman underwent a bilateral DIEP free flap procedure. On postoperative day 6, she experienced flap compromise and underwent emergency flap revision. In the flap revision, flap venous drainage and the superficial inferior epigastric vein were completely obstructed. A Fogarty catheter was used to remove a thrombus from the completely obstructed pedicle vein, and this pedicle vein was used as a graft source and was ligated in retrograde fashion to the flap vein stump. After injection of urokinase into the arterial branch, venous flow to the flap was restored. At a 6-month follow-up visit in the outpatient clinic, only partial fat necrosis at the flap was noted. By dissecting various perforators in the initial operation, decisions regarding immediate revision can be made with more confidence. Additionally, the combined procedures performed in this case may be helpful even for practitioners treating cases of late flap compromise.

Keywords

References

  1. Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kenna DM, et al. Thrombosis of microvascular anastomoses in traumatized vessels: fibrin versus platelets. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:110-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199007000-00017
  2. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:1230-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199612000-00017
  3. Olsson E, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Bohling T, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of failed vessel anastomoses in clinical microsurgery. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:567-73. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3408
  4. Henderson PW, Fernandez JG, Cemal Y, et al. Successful salvage of late anastomotic thrombosis after free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:316-24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1571359
  5. Nelson JA, Kim EM, Eftekhari K, et al. Late venous thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction: strategies for salvage after this real entity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:8e-15e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361f14
  6. Wheatley MJ, Meltzer TR. The role of vascular pedicle thrombectomy in the management of compromised free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:360-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199604000-00006
  7. Trussler AP, Watson JP, Crisera CA. Late free-flap salvage with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Microsurgery 2008;28: 217-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20480