DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of simulation systems for telemanipulators in confined cell facilities

  • Received : 2019.03.29
  • Accepted : 2019.07.24
  • Published : 2020.02.25

Abstract

The considered simulation tasks are based on an electrometallurgical process development strategy and associated telemanipulator simulation systems are proposed with various scales of experimental facilities. Fundamentally, target facilities are assumed to be operated only by remote handling systems because the considered process is operated in hazardous environments. Futhermore, the feasibility at various scales should be experimentally verified with gradual increase in throughput. In this regard, bench, engineering, and pilot-scale simulation systems are important early-stage tools for assessing the practical operability of the target process with the material handling systems. Such simulation systems are highly customized for applications and are a precursor to larger pilot and demonstration-scale plants. This paper introduced and classified the developed simulator systems for this approach at various scales using remote handling systems which were assembled inside a virtual target facility, and the manmachine interface was included for a more realistic operation of the simulator. The results obtained for each simulator show the feasibility and requirement for improvement of the systems for the considered test issues with respect to the operation and maintenance of the process.

Keywords

References

  1. O. Sourina, et al., Virtual orthopedic surgery training on personal computer, Int. J. Inf. Technol. 6 (1) (2000).
  2. C. Chabal, et al., EMM-3D: a virtual environment for evaluating maintenability from CAD models, Laval Virtual 2005 (2005).
  3. O. David, F.X. RussTMo, M.D.S. Simoes, Y. Measson, Collision avoidance, virtual guides and advanced supervisory control teleoperation techniques for hightech construction: framework design, Autom. Construct. 44 (2014) 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.020
  4. P. Garrec, Y. Perrot, Force feedback nuclear telerobotics in France: R&D results and industrial achievements, in: Puresafe Final Conference, CERN, 2015.
  5. J.M. Detriche, Innovations in dismantling robotics, Nucl. Eng. Des. 182 (No. 3) (1998) 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00307-5
  6. Radioactive Waste Management Committee, Remote Handling Techniques in Decommissioning, NEA/RWM/R, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2011.
  7. D.J. Hyun, S.U. Lee, Y.C. Seo, G.H. Kim, J.H. Lee, K.S. Jeong, B.S. Choi, J.K. Moon, Seamless remote dismantling system for heavy and highly radioactive components of Korean nuclear power plants, Ann. Nucl. Energy 73 (2014) 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.06.020
  8. D.J. Hyun, I.J. Kim, J.H. Lee, G.H. Kim, K.S. Jeong, User interface technology to reduce mental Transformations for tangible remote dismantling simulator, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, 2015.
  9. R. Shepard, Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science 171 (1971) 701-703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
  10. B.S. Choi, D.J. Hyun, I.J. Kim, J.H. Lee, J.K. Moon, Virtual Decommissioning Simulator for Preliminary Verification of Dismantling Scenarios over Nuclear Facilities, D&RS, Pittsburgh, PA, 2016, 2016.
  11. X. Gong, Triangle Mesh Based In-Process Workpiece Update for General Milling Processes, ASME IDETC/CIE, 2013.
  12. T. Moller, A fast triangle-triangle intersection test, J. Graph. Tools 2 (1997) 25-30.
  13. C. Bruyns, Survey of interactive mesh-cutting techniques and a new method for implementation generalized interactive mesh cutting using virtual tools, J. Vis. Comput. Animat. 13 (2002) 21-42.
  14. S. Williams, M. Ounpuu, K. Sarbutt, Bench and pilot plant programs for flotation circuit design, Miner. Process. Plant Des. Pract. Contr. (2002) 145-159.
  15. S.N. Yu, et al., Ergonomic analysis of tele-operation tasks and remote handling devices for a pyroprocessing facility, J. Ergon. Soc. Korea 32 (1) (2013) 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2013.32.1.17
  16. S.N. Yu, J.K. Lee, S.H. Kim, B.S. Park, K.H. Kim, I.J. Cho, Evaluation of telemanipulation performance for pyroprocessing equipment using computational simulation and mock-up test, in: Annual Spring Conference of KSME (Korea Society of Mechanical Engineers) in 2014, 2014, pp. 190-191.
  17. H. Lee, G.-i. Park, J.-w. Lee, et al., Current status of pyroprocessing development at KAERI, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2013 (2013), 343492.
  18. I.J. Cho, J.H. Han, S.N. Yu, et al., Development of engineering scale pyro-processing facility-PRIDE, in: The 52nd HOTLAB Meeting, 2015.
  19. J. Hur, D.-h. Ahn, Demonstration of engineering scale pyroprocessing at the PRIDE facility, in: ISACAT, 2015.
  20. S.N. Yu, J.H. Lim, H.S. Im, H.J. Lee, Equipment layout improvement for largescale hot cell facility logistics, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2017 (2017), 4585120, 11 pages.
  21. Website: http://krse.co.kr/english/product/prod_01.html (Accessed on February, 2019).
  22. Website: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/products/tecnomatix (Accessed on February, 2019).
  23. J. Wernecke, The inventor mentor programming object-oriented 3D graphics with open inventor, Release 2 (1996) 123-137.
  24. A.M. Lopes, J. Santos, H. Peixoto, A.A. Sousa, M.T. Restivo, Human-machine real-virtual haptic interaction systems, in: 9th International Conference Virtual University, 2008.
  25. M. Lin, K. Salisbury, Haptic rendering-beyond visual computing, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2 (2004) 22-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.1982.1674293
  26. J. Hudi, R. Spies, Integration of digital mock-up and multibody simulation in the product-development process, in: International ADAMS User'Conference, 1999, pp. 17-18.
  27. K. Salisbury, F. Conti, F. Barbagli, Haptic rendering: introductory concepts, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 24 (2) (2004) 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2004.1274058
  28. C.H. Choi, S.H. Kim, H.J. Lee, J.K. Lee, K.H. Kim, A haptic device interface for the operation of the virtual arm, in: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems 2010, 2010, pp. 1755-1758.
  29. Website: https://www.lanner.com/en-gb/insights/news/taking-discreteevent-simulation-to-the-next-level.html (Accessed on February, 2019).
  30. Website: https://www.lanner.com/en-gb/technology/witness-simulationsoftware.html (Accessed on February, 2019).
  31. D.S. Ryu, J.H. Han, J.K. Lee, H.J. Lee, Automation testbed for remote basket handling in a hot cell, in: HOTLAB 2017, 2017.