Journal of Plant Biotechnology

  • 제47권1호
  • /
  • Pages.26-39
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-2818(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1397(eISSN)
한국식물생명공학회 (The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Distinctive response of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in vitro with the acceleration of phytohormones

  • 투고 : 2020.01.02
  • 심사 : 2020.02.13
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In maize, immature embryos (IEs) are highly regenerative explants most suitable for producing high frequencies of plantlet regeneration in vitro. Apart from media, explants, and hormones, genotypic variation also influences in vitro characters to a great extent. In the present study, IEs were used to study the distinctive effect of variation of size/stage and hormones in different genotypes on five in vitro characters viz., frequency of callus induction, growth rate of total callus, frequency of E. callus induction, and volume and number of regenerated plantlets. LS medium with different concentrations of 2,4-D (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 4.0 and 5.0 mg/L) were used to study the former four in vitro characters, and medium with 6-benzylaminopurine and kinetin (0.5 mg/L, each) was used for plantlet regeneration. IEs of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mm in size were isolated from four inbred lines viz., NM74C, NM81A, NM5883 and NM5884. Two-way ANOVA revealed that explant size and genotypes, as well as hormonal concentrations showed significant effects on in vitro characters. Two millimeter IEs were found to be suitable for in vitro cultures. LS medium with 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D and LS with BAP and Kn (0.5 mg/L, each) were found to be the best hormonal concentrations for callus induction, maintenance, and regeneration, respectively. Among the four genotypes, NM81A and NM5883 yielded more non-embryogenic and Type I E. calli. In contrast, NM74C and NM5884 yielded more highly regenerative Type II calli. Inbred line NM5884 was found to be the best among these four genotypes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aguado-Santacruz GA, Garcia-Moya E, Aguilar- Acuna JL, Moreno-Gomez B, Preciado-Ortiz ER, Jimenez-Bremont JF, Rascon-Cruz Q (2007) In vitro plant regeneration from quality protein maize (QPM). In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:215-224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9042-9
  2. Ahmadabadi M, Ruf S, Bock R (2007) A leaf-based regeneration and transformation system for maize (Zea mays L.). Transgenic Research 16:437-448 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-006-9046-y
  3. Al-Abed D, Rudrabhatla S, Talla R, Goldman S (2006) Split-seed: a new tool for maize researchers. Planta 223:1355-1360 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0237-9
  4. Ali F, Ahsan M, Saeed NA, Ahmed M, Ali Q, Kanwal N, Tehseen MM, Ijaz U, Bibi I, Niazi NK (2014) Establishment and optimization of callus-to-plant regeneration system using mature and immature embryos of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 16:111-117
  5. Armstrong CL, Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-Proline. Planta 164:207-214 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396083
  6. Barloy D, Beckert M (1993) Improvement of regeneration ability of androgenetic embryos by early anther transfer in maize. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 33:45-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997597
  7. Bhaskaran S, Smith RH (1990) Regeneration in cereal tissue culture: a review. Crop Science 30:1328-1337 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060034x
  8. Bohorova NE, Van GM, Rajaram S, Hoisington DA (1995) Tissue culture response of CIMMYT elite bread wheat cultivars and evaluation of regenerated plants. Cereal Research Communications 23:243-249
  9. Conger BV, Novak FJ, Afza R, Erdelsky K (1987) Somatic embryogenesis from cultured leaf segments of Zea mays L. Plant Cell Reports 6:345-347 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269556
  10. Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE, Widholm JM (1985) The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays L genotypes. Planta 165:322-332 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392228
  11. Frame BR, McMurray JM, Fonger TM, Main ML, Taylor KW, Torney FJ, Paz MM, Wang K (2006) Improved Agrobacteriummediated transformation of three maize inbred lines using MS salts. Plant Cell Reports 25:1024-1034 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0145-2
  12. Furini A, Jewell DC (1994) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of tropical and subtropical Zea mays L genotypes. Maydica 39:155-164
  13. Giridhar P, Indu EP, Vijaya Ramu D, Ravishakar GA (2003) Effect of silver nitrate on in vitro shoot growth of Coffee. Tropical Science 43:44-146 https://doi.org/10.1002/ts.87
  14. Gorji AH, Zolnoori M, Jamasbi A, Zolnoori Z (2011) In vitro plant generation of tropical maize genotypes. International Conference on Environmental Biomedical and Biotechnology IPCBEE 16:52-59
  15. Grando MF, Varnier ML, Silva MRD, Emydio BM, Pereira LR, Suzin M (2013) Immature tassels as alternative explants in somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in south Brazilian maize genotypes. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 35:39-47
  16. Green CE, Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Science 15:417-421 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500030040x
  17. Ishida Y, Hiei Y, Komari T (2007) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize. Nature Protocols 2:1614-1621 https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.241
  18. Ismaili A, Mohammadi PP (2016) Effect of genotype induction medium carbohydrate source and polyethylene glycol on embryogenesis in maize (Zea mays L.) anther culture. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:74 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2085-y
  19. Jogeswar G, Ranadheer D, Anjaiah V, Kishor PBK (2007) High frequency somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in different genotypes of Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench from immature inflorescence explants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:159-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9033-x
  20. Lee BL, Kennon AR, Chen X, Jung TW, Ahn BO, Lee JY, Zhang ZJ (2007) Recovery of transgenic events from two highly recalcitrant maize (Zea mays L) genotypes using Agrobacteriummediated standar- binary- vector transformation. Maydica 52:457-469
  21. Linsmaier E, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 18:100-127 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x
  22. Malini N, Anandakumar CR, Hari Ramakrishnan S (2015) Regeneration of Indian maize genotypes (Zea mays L.) from immature embryo culture through callus induction. J Appl Nat Sci 7:131-137 https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.576
  23. Mendoza MG, Kaeppler HF (2002) Auxin and sugar effects on callus induction and plant regeneration frequencies from mature embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38:39-45 https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2001250
  24. Morocz C, Donn G, Nemeth J, Dudits D (1990) An improved system to obtain fertile regenerates via maize protoplast isolated from highly embryogenic suspension culture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80:721-726 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224183
  25. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15:473-497 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  26. Mushke R, Yarra R, Bulle M (2016) Efficient in vitro direct shoot organogenesis from seedling derived split node explants of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 14:49-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.03.001
  27. O'Connor-Sanchez A, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Valdez-Melara M, Tellez-Rodriguez P, Pons-Hernandez JL, Herrera-Estrella L (2002) Transgenic maize plants of tropical and subtropical genotypes obtained from calluses containing organogenic and embryogenic-like structures derived from shoot tips . Plant Cell Reports 21:302-312 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0502-8
  28. Pareddy DR, Petolino JF (1990) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature inflorescences of several elite inbreds of maize. Plant Science 67:211-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(90)90245-J
  29. Pavan Kumar G, Sreenu P, Sridevi M, Reddy MK, Sateesh Kumar P (2018) Coleoptilar node - A season-independent explant source for in vitro culture in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology 6:20-28
  30. Rao AM, Sree KP, Kishor PBK (1995) Enhanced plant regeneration in grain and sweet sorghum by asparagine proline and cefotaxime. Plant Cell Rep15:72-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690257
  31. Ray DS, Ghosh PD (1990) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cultured leaf explants of Zea mays L. Annals of Botany 66:497-500 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088057
  32. Rooz BBK (2002) Plastid transformation in maize: construction and testing of vector. Dissertation, Post Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
  33. Rueb S, Leneman M, Schilperoort RA, Hensgens LAM (1994) Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus induced on mature rice embryos (Oryza sativa L). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 36:259-264 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037729
  34. Sairam RV, Parani M, Franklin G, Lifeng Z, Smith B, MacDougall J, Wilber C (2003) Shoot meristem: an ideal explant for Zea mays L. transformation. Genome 46:323-329 https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-120
  35. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1968) Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa, USA Oxford and IBH publishing Co Pvt Ltd New Delhi
  36. Sreenu P, Sridevi M, Kumar PS, Reddy MK, Sailaja D, Kumar GP (2016a) Optimization of Some Influential Factors In Maize Genetic Transformation Through Microprojectile Bombardment. Int J Recent Sci Res 7:10517-10522
  37. Sreenu P, Kumar PS, Reddy MK, Sailaja D, Kumar GP (2016b) Resourceful and high efficiency Agrobacterium mediated transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) using coleoptilar nodal explants. Int J Curr Res Biosci Plant Biol 3:1-9
  38. Tiwari S, Agrawal PK, Pande V, Gupta HS (2015) Callus induction and whole plant regeneration in sub-tropical maize (Zea mays L.) using mature embryos as explants. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 75:330-335 https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00052.8
  39. Tomes DT, Smith OS (1985) The effect of parental genotype on initiation of embryogenic callus from elite maize (Zea mays L) germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 70:505-509 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305983
  40. Vikrant, Rashid A (2003) Somatic embryogenesis or shoot formation following high 24-D pulse-treatment of mature embryos of Paspalum scrobiculatum. Biol Plant 46:297-300 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022875332607
  41. Vladimir S, Gilbertson L, Adae P, Duncan D (2006) Agrobacterium mediated transformation of seedling-derived maize callus. Plant Cell Rep 25:320-328 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0058-5
  42. Zhao L, Liu S, Song S (2010) Optimization of callus induction and plant regeneration from germinating seeds of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench). Afr J Biotechnol 9:2367-74
  43. Zhong H, Srinivasan C, Sticklen MB (1992) In-vitro morphogenesis of corn (Zea mays L.): II Differentiation of multiple shoot clumps and somatic embryos from shoot tips. Planta 187:483-489 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00199966